USB Dacs - what for?
- Thread starter Don Quichotte
- Start date
tschanrm
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Dec 10, 2003
- Messages
- 160
- Reaction score
- 0
While I don't know all the technical merits, I know that the USB DACs will exhibit similar jitter problems. This is because USB audio is still streamed over, it is not the same type of transfer as say a USB hard drive has. There's more than one thread relating to this, and I've read an article about the issues with USB audio. I'll see if I can't find that USB article for you, its an intersting read. : )
And the advantage I guess is there is one less piece of equipment in the signal path. Instead of going from S/PDIF from Sound Card---->DAC----->Stereo, your just go Sound Card(or USB DAC)----->Stereo. Although, of course, this does not guarantee that the latter combo will produce better sound.
And the advantage I guess is there is one less piece of equipment in the signal path. Instead of going from S/PDIF from Sound Card---->DAC----->Stereo, your just go Sound Card(or USB DAC)----->Stereo. Although, of course, this does not guarantee that the latter combo will produce better sound.
clarke68
1000+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Apr 5, 2004
- Messages
- 1,088
- Reaction score
- 10
If there are specific sonic advantages to an outboard usb dac, it has to do with the commonly held belief that PCs produce large amounts of EMI (or RFI? Or both?) and you should move your D/A conversion as far away as possible.
More practically speaking (for me): I do a lot of listening at work, where I'm not allowed to add PCI soundcards at will. Also, it allows me the additional flexibility of using any outboard DAC I want, rather than what's on the (comparatively) few audiophile grade soundcards available.
More practically speaking (for me): I do a lot of listening at work, where I'm not allowed to add PCI soundcards at will. Also, it allows me the additional flexibility of using any outboard DAC I want, rather than what's on the (comparatively) few audiophile grade soundcards available.
ToddW
New Head-Fier
- Joined
- Apr 21, 2005
- Messages
- 24
- Reaction score
- 0
not to change topic or anything, but i have an imac G5 with optical out and would like someway to convert it to some type of preamp linout. anyone got any ideas.
clarke68
1000+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Apr 5, 2004
- Messages
- 1,088
- Reaction score
- 10
Quote:
Use a digital/analog converter, or DAC. Many are available, from quite cheap to very expensive.
Originally Posted by ToddW i have an imac G5 with optical out and would like someway to convert it to some type of preamp linout. |
Use a digital/analog converter, or DAC. Many are available, from quite cheap to very expensive.
sygyzy
1000+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Oct 16, 2003
- Messages
- 1,146
- Reaction score
- 11
I think the argument for USB DAC over PC Soundcard digital out to DAC is because some systems simply don't have a high-end enough sound card with SPDIF out. But every system has USB.
sgrossklass
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2004
- Messages
- 2,803
- Reaction score
- 19
The issue of jitter will depend on where transfers are done isochonously or asynchronously. Asynchronous transfers would eliminate the jitter introduced by S/PDIF transmission.
Don Quichotte
500+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2003
- Messages
- 767
- Reaction score
- 39
Quote:
Isn't asynchronous transfer more or less the same thing (or at least has the same effects) as the reclocking done by some stand-alone Dacs? Let's take the Apogee Mini-Dac for example: it does reclock the data received via S/PDIF and can be connected via USB to a computer. Any reason for the USB connection method to sound better than S/PDIF? (let's assume the S/PDIF out of the soundcard is bit-perfect)
The issue of jitter will depend on where transfers are done isochonously or asynchronously. Asynchronous transfers would eliminate the jitter introduced by S/PDIF transmission |
Isn't asynchronous transfer more or less the same thing (or at least has the same effects) as the reclocking done by some stand-alone Dacs? Let's take the Apogee Mini-Dac for example: it does reclock the data received via S/PDIF and can be connected via USB to a computer. Any reason for the USB connection method to sound better than S/PDIF? (let's assume the S/PDIF out of the soundcard is bit-perfect)
robzy
500+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Sep 17, 2004
- Messages
- 951
- Reaction score
- 10
Another reason is that a lot of sound cards resample the audio before it even for digital out.
Rob.
Rob.
Oliver :)
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2002
- Messages
- 2,882
- Reaction score
- 13
Quote:
Bear in mind that the iMac will not allow adjusting the volume once you use the optical out. You are left with on/off. The levelmeter in iTunes / Quicktime still work though, therefore you can gain your volume control back (at least for iTunes) with the highly recommended SizzlingKeys http://www.yellowmug.com/sk4it/
Originally Posted by ToddW not to change topic or anything, but i have an imac G5 with optical out and would like someway to convert it to some type of preamp linout. anyone got any ideas. |
Bear in mind that the iMac will not allow adjusting the volume once you use the optical out. You are left with on/off. The levelmeter in iTunes / Quicktime still work though, therefore you can gain your volume control back (at least for iTunes) with the highly recommended SizzlingKeys http://www.yellowmug.com/sk4it/