Slater
Headphoneus Supremus
Haha these were being hyped as BLON killers at the beginning of this thread so I went to check them out on AE and... Well they're 2x the cost of the BLONs
They were $39 when they first came out.
Haha these were being hyped as BLON killers at the beginning of this thread so I went to check them out on AE and... Well they're 2x the cost of the BLONs
All of the new “white box” units should have beryllium drivers. Another option for a beryllium-coated DD is the FiiO FD1 or JA EA1.I got in on the drop! We'll see if it even makes it to the minimum order. I really want to try a bassy beryllium driver IEM and if it's all a risk with the YBF, then I want to pay as little for taking it as possible. Unless there's some understanding that the drop YBFs won't be beryllium, which would be a bummer.
All of the new “white box” units should have beryllium drivers. Another option for a beryllium-coated DD is the FiiO FD1 or JA EA1.
They were $39 when they first came out.
One can boost the bass A LOT by placing micropore tape over the main vent on the FD1. I don’t find it to be bright at all, and am quite sensitive to bright IEMs, but everyone hears things differently. The EA1 is identical to the FD1, but is $20 less. If you’re not interested in the FD1, the EA1 is a no-go.Yeah, the FR on the FD1 didn't interest me. Not enough bass. I can't do bright IEMs. Not familiar with the JA EA1 though! Food for thought.
I got the black box with white dot and so far the mmcx connection seems stable.
Packaging had a white sticker dot. Not sure what it supposed to be representing
Also I spoke too soon about the QC. This mmcx female sockets are pretty bad. I had to fix one on left side already. That is after very first try of swapping cable.
Does anyone have a kanas pro or fdx1 to compare them to? I like the fdx1 soo Much as it excels in all departments but it can sound a bit thin at times. I also love everything about the kpe as my backup Iem but after switching from the fdx1 I immediately realise the detail and clarity loss. I would pick up the urbanfun if they have better technicalities then the kpe and preferably a larger stage. It's been a while since I've purchased an iem but I'm looking for an upgrade over my backup iem (kpe) as the fdx1 don't fit my ears good enough for work times as I'm constantly moving.
I have the FDX1 and YBF. The YBF has a ton more bass compared to the FDX1, but the speed, quality, resolution of bass I think is similar. Due to the amount of bass on YBF, it does bleed into the mids some. The overall midrange is a little recessed on the YBF comparatively, but the upper mids on both are very clear and emphasized, though it isn’t as fatiguing on the YBF, to me. In un-modded stock form, I can’t tolerate the upper midrange of the FDX1, as it’s way to shouty for me. The sound is warmer on the YBF, due to the bass, vs the cool and analytic sound of the FDX1. Treble extension is a little bit better on the YBF though. Overall detail and resolution are notably better on the FDX1, though at the cost of listening fatigue. The YBF sounds like it has more of an L-shaped sound to me, though it actually is more V-shaped.Does anyone have a kanas pro or fdx1 to compare them to? I like the fdx1 soo Much as it excels in all departments but it can sound a bit thin at times. I also love everything about the kpe as my backup Iem but after switching from the fdx1 I immediately realise the detail and clarity loss. I would pick up the urbanfun if they have better technicalities then the kpe and preferably a larger stage. It's been a while since I've purchased an iem but I'm looking for an upgrade over my backup iem (kpe) as the fdx1 don't fit my ears good enough for work times as I'm constantly moving.
Thanks alot for this comparison it really helped me decide! I will probably pass on these for now as it sounds like it's similar to my kpe and I'm looking for an upgrade over them in terms of technicalities. After listening to the fdx1 it's soo hard listening to other bloated iems for me.I have the FDX1 and YBF. The YBF has a ton more bass compared to the FDX1, but the speed, quality, resolution of bass I think is similar. Due to the amount of bass on YBF, it does bleed into the mids some. The overall midrange is a little recessed on the YBF comparatively, but the upper mids on both are very clear and emphasized, though it isn’t as fatiguing on the YBF, to me. In un-modded stock form, I can’t tolerate the upper midrange of the FDX1, as it’s way to shouty for me. The sound is warmer on the YBF, due to the bass, vs the cool and analytic sound of the FDX1. Treble extension is a little bit better on the YBF though. Overall detail and resolution are notably better on the FDX1, though at the cost of listening fatigue. The YBF sounds like it has more of an L-shaped sound to me, though it actually is more V-shaped.
So, while the YBF is technically quite capable, it doesn’t match the FDX1, as few single DD IEMs can match it IMO.
After listening to the fdx1 it's soo hard listening to other bloated iems for me.