sphinxvc
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- May 28, 2010
- Posts
- 3,469
- Likes
- 109
It's really sad the way they try to dodge responsibility when it's clear they're the ones at fault. I would have expected the run-around from USPS but not from UPS, it's why I chose to pay extra and ship with them, just in case something goes wrong!
Anyhow, I'm preparing whatever evidence I have against them, I wish I had got it in writing when they said 3 cards were deemed working and 1 was bent, so that when I opened the package at their store and only found 3, I could say that it proves they never opened the package to 'inspect' it before denying my claim.
Morons.
I will tell the court myself anyway. The only problem I foresee is them asking me to provide evidence the graphics cards were working prior to shipping -- which is going to be tough to do since I bought them on craigslist for straight cash. So no receipt or anything. I did test them myself if that counts for anything.
However, I think that issue is outside the scope of the case (right guys?) -- the issue here is that they're not honoring the pack and ship promise, not whether I can prove whether they working prior to shipping, but even if that was brought up by UPS/store wouldn't the burden of proof lie on them to prove that it wasn't working prior to shipping?
Surely the case can't be decided on a suspicion like that?
Anyhow, I'm preparing whatever evidence I have against them, I wish I had got it in writing when they said 3 cards were deemed working and 1 was bent, so that when I opened the package at their store and only found 3, I could say that it proves they never opened the package to 'inspect' it before denying my claim.
Morons.
I will tell the court myself anyway. The only problem I foresee is them asking me to provide evidence the graphics cards were working prior to shipping -- which is going to be tough to do since I bought them on craigslist for straight cash. So no receipt or anything. I did test them myself if that counts for anything.
However, I think that issue is outside the scope of the case (right guys?) -- the issue here is that they're not honoring the pack and ship promise, not whether I can prove whether they working prior to shipping, but even if that was brought up by UPS/store wouldn't the burden of proof lie on them to prove that it wasn't working prior to shipping?
Surely the case can't be decided on a suspicion like that?