tayano
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Jan 23, 2005
- Posts
- 378
- Likes
- 28
I recived shure's triflanges(biflanges, as Jmmmm says since I cut of the first flange) a coulpe of days ago,and I've been testing them with my um2 w/iriver H10. All I can say that the sound is more balanced,better and clearer highs,tighter bass and the vocals are more realistisc. With the comply tips
um2 sounded tooo dark without EQ,but they sound pretty good without EQ using triflanges,thougt the treble is recede. Now when using EQ they sounds so good and balanced,this experience is like when I heard UM2 the first time,they sounded so good and clear but after time I found them to bassy. Now I don't find them bassy at all.
I wrote in one other thread that that the right phone sounded less then the left one,but I got ridden of that problem with triflanges,I guess that the fit of the triflanges makes them equal. When I used comply tips I pushed them deeply in my ear and I think that the soft robber-tips could resist the pressure so it blocked the whole,and that's why the left phone was absent. But the triflanges is made of silicon,asknown,and they can resist te pressure so they won't block the whole.
um2 sounded tooo dark without EQ,but they sound pretty good without EQ using triflanges,thougt the treble is recede. Now when using EQ they sounds so good and balanced,this experience is like when I heard UM2 the first time,they sounded so good and clear but after time I found them to bassy. Now I don't find them bassy at all.
I wrote in one other thread that that the right phone sounded less then the left one,but I got ridden of that problem with triflanges,I guess that the fit of the triflanges makes them equal. When I used comply tips I pushed them deeply in my ear and I think that the soft robber-tips could resist the pressure so it blocked the whole,and that's why the left phone was absent. But the triflanges is made of silicon,asknown,and they can resist te pressure so they won't block the whole.