Quote:
Originally Posted by Marc303 /img/forum/go_quote.gif
troll ? why ? have i said something that you dont like so you too react with petty insults ?
this is an 8 page thread about how mp3 makes his ears hurt using a power cable.
ive give him a test of mp3 vs CD and he got 75% wrong. HELLO! YES 75% INCORRECT - He couldnt tell the difference between mp3/wav files. This whole thread is 8 pages of fantasy laa laa
if anyone is trolling, its you people with your countless threads regarding stupid claims about amazing changes in your hifi systems because of a power cable
|
The only thing that test proved was that skeptics are desperate in being right which results in them having poor reading skills. They see what they want to see, and when they finally see it properly, they start cherry picking to suit their beliefs. When they are faced with the truth, they start ignoring it.
MP3 doesn't make my ears hurt, WAV and VBR MP3 does, that's why I use 192kbps MP3 with my computer. Your test was VBR vs WAV using tracks I never heard before, and I never gave a final answer because the differences were too small.
With my albums the difference between 192kbps and 256kbps is bigger than 256kbps vs WAV. 128-192kbps has smearing, but 256 or VBR doesn't have it, the only differences I hear from 256kbps and above is from the high frequencies, and trance albums don't have enough of it. The only time I could hear a difference between 320kbps vs WAV was two and half years ago when I used 'The Lord Of The Rings - The Return Of The King' as my reference album. I haven't used classical as my reference for almost two years because they aren't complex enough.
The difference between a modded Nordost Vishnu and a modded Valhalla power cord is almost the same as the difference between 192kbps MP3 vs WAV. With original Vishnu vs original Valhalla the difference is bigger than 128kbps MP3 vs WAV just because the sound signature changes so much from the thicker cable.
My tweaked Cary transport + 1x16awg Valhalla + WAV has the same smoothness as computer + 5x16awg Valhalla + 128kbps MP3. Cary makes it smoother from lower jitter, and computer makes it smoother from smearing of MP3 and thicker power cord which also gives fake body.
When using WAV with the computer it sounds whiter, blacker and heavier than neutral, it is fatiguing so I often use 192kbps MP3 instead. 192kbps + computer still has a blacker background than my 30 times more expensive Cary transport + WAV.
The only reason Cary is good is because it has extra bass transients (more low-level detail) from the thinner power cord, higher frequencies from WAV, and cleaner highs from 192kHz upsampling and AES/EBU. Cary has too little jitter (too warm) and too much low-level detail so I needed to compensate for it by adding edginess from Valhalla interconnect which also cut off the lowest level details to make it even cleaner.
Getting the cheapest system is from Valkyrja wiring and jitter from computer.