trose49
Banned
- Joined
- Jun 8, 2005
- Posts
- 3,528
- Likes
- 10
Originally Posted by nibiyabi /img/forum/go_quote.gif Haven't heard of it -- I'm willing to gamble that an iModded iPod will sound far better, since your iPod will still be filled with cheap components (not to mention this costs ten times more than the iMod upgrade). |
Originally Posted by cooperpwc /img/forum/go_quote.gif These guys are your basic snake oil shysters. I quote from the site: "The Apple designers had the foresight to allow iTunes and the iPod to work with CD data unlike any other CD ripping or burning programs - with bit-perfect accuracy. Many listeners notice that CDR copies of CDs often sound different. This is because they are not bit perfect. Almost all burning programs do some re-equalization. iTunes makes a bit-perfect copy and will store that data on the iPod. That is why this product will revolutionize our interface to our high-end systems. " (emphasis added) Uh no... If you really wanted to spend $2,000 on a DAP, you wouldn't be ripping in iTunes. I smell oil of snake...! |
Originally Posted by 3X0 /img/forum/go_quote.gif Agreed, but would ALAC qualify? |
Originally Posted by MSB Review Page There are 0 reviews for the products MSB iLink Digital Upgrade They are arranged in order from most recent. |
Originally Posted by hempcamp /img/forum/go_quote.gif Can the iMod be done on a 5G yet? That's the only advantage these people seem to have over it. Well, and with the iMod you still rely on the built-in DAC (which really ain't too shabby). --Chris |
The digital format of its audio files are converted within the iPod, which negates any attempt to create true-to-CD audio. This means that no matter how much money an audiophile spends on iPod docking stations that boast great sound, the quality will not come close to a CD played on a high-end system. |
Now don't get me wrong, there is nothing wrong with the iPod. It is a good low-power DAC for driving headphones and playing MP3s. |
Originally Posted by Vinnie R. /img/forum/go_quote.gif While I think it is very cool that MSB designed a dock that creates SPDIF (It must take the native clock and data signals before the built-in dac, and then use a chip to convert them into the SPDIF format), I can't say I like how they advertise it by saying this: Please! Are they trying to say that if you use Apple Lossless or WAV with your iPod's analog outputs that it won't be "true-to-CD audio?" All they are doing is converting digital data to SPDIF so you can send it to a different dac than the internal Wolfson WM8975 dac in the iPod (which I find to be a lot more musical and less sterile than many much higher priced external dacs... just my opinion). Converting digital data to SPDIF, transmitting spdif, receiving SPDIF at the dac, and then doing the D/A conversion with another dac is not nearly as straightforward as avoiding all of this and using the Wolfson. The iPod motherboard layout is very clean, with digital traces that are tiny. Everything is running on clean battery power. Where is the problem? And they also say: Again, they make it sound like you can't get CD quality out of the iPod unless you use an external dac with their $2k iLink system! Sure, not that there is anything wrong with the iPod if you like MP3.... please! They even talk about using Apple Lossless in iTunes, but I guess you can't get true CD quality unless you use an iLink. |