Transient Speed all that?
Jul 28, 2006 at 4:54 PM Post #76 of 90
Great Minds think alike
biggrin.gif
:

She's been there done that!

http://www.geocities.com/iona_m/Cosm...onEgineer.html

http://www.geocities.com/iona_m/Cosm...Engineer2.html

http://www.geocities.com/iona_m/Cosm...ology2000.html

http://www.geocities.com/iona_m/
 
Jul 28, 2006 at 5:51 PM Post #77 of 90
My god.
I have never seen such a good question be horribly thread Jacked.

The OP had a good question, and somehow (we can guess how) it turns into a "lets link to anything that has to do with physics" extravaganza.

This thread has made me sad.
frown.gif


Dr. Sade, mind giving it a rest? The last two or so pages really wern't even addressing the OP's question.
 
Jul 28, 2006 at 5:57 PM Post #78 of 90
Quote:

Originally Posted by Towert7
My god.
I have never seen such a good question be horribly thread Jacked.

The OP had a good question, and somehow (we can guess how) it turns into a "lets link to anything that has to do with physics" extravaganza.

This thread as made me sad.
frown.gif


Dr. Sade, mind giving it a rest? The last two or so pages really wern't even addressing the OP's question.



OMG, I just noticed Dr. Sade is the OP.

Oh boy, this is perverse on a whole new level!

I'm out of here before it gets even more strange.
 
Jul 28, 2006 at 6:13 PM Post #79 of 90
Quote:

Originally Posted by Towert7
OMG, I just noticed Dr. Sade is the OP.

Oh boy, this is perverse on a whole new level!

I'm out of here before it gets even more strange.



The Devil is in the details.
evil_smiley.gif


You'd have to read the whole thread from the beginning to get it; even then
most people like you wouldn't get it or have the time or patience to try and get it. Sigh, most people don't get much of anything; they just consume, consume, consume...

You can go back to your K81DJ now; that seems to be the latest marketing darling this month.
rolleyes.gif
 
Jul 28, 2006 at 6:23 PM Post #80 of 90
Quote:

Originally Posted by Dr.Sade
The Devil is in the details.
evil_smiley.gif


You'd have to read the whole thread from the beginning to get it; even then
most people like you wouldn't get it or have the time or patience to try and get it. Sigh, most people don't get much of anything; they just consume, consume, consume...

You can go back to your K81DJ now; that seems to be the latest marketing darling his month.
rolleyes.gif



With a response like that, it's people like you who I avoid.
 
Jul 28, 2006 at 7:35 PM Post #82 of 90
Dr. Sade

As I understand this thread there are no details, its all illusion. So there is nothing to get.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dr.Sade
The Devil is in the details.
evil_smiley.gif


You'd have to read the whole thread from the beginning to get it; even then
most people like you wouldn't get it or have the time or patience to try and get it. Sigh, most people don't get much of anything; they just consume, consume, consume...

You can go back to your K81DJ now; that seems to be the latest marketing darling this month.
rolleyes.gif



 
Jul 28, 2006 at 7:38 PM Post #83 of 90
This thread can't be hijacked, it is only an illusion.

If anyone did it, it was me and I should just exit..to the ..right ...left...center...it all illusion I can't figure where to leave....I am hopelessly caught up in an illusion....help...

Quote:

Originally Posted by Towert7
My god.
I have never seen such a good question be horribly thread Jacked.

The OP had a good question, and somehow (we can guess how) it turns into a "lets link to anything that has to do with physics" extravaganza.

This thread has made me sad.
frown.gif


Dr. Sade, mind giving it a rest? The last two or so pages really wern't even addressing the OP's question.



 
Jul 29, 2006 at 7:24 PM Post #85 of 90
Quote:

Originally Posted by slwiser
Dr. Sade

As I understand this thread there are no details, its all illusion. So there is nothing to get.



You are one of the details and you are an illusion. Illusions have details.

Anyway, the point is:

1) Headphones are a subset of the whole Virtual Reality issue.

2) In the future, "Headfi" will be called "Virtual-Headfi".

3) Virtual Realites can leak into each other. The Krell ("Forbidden Planet" 1956) learned this the hard way. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Krell

That's all for tonight's bedtime story kiddies. Pleasant dreams.

... and remember the Krell.
 
Jul 29, 2006 at 7:29 PM Post #86 of 90
Wonder of wonders, one of my all time favorite movies. I watch this on DVD every once in a while.

Team Krell....

A great precursor to the Star Trek franchise. In the first opening scenes you seen so much of where Star Trek came from.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dr.Sade
3) Virtual Realites can leak into each other. The Krell ("Forbidden Planet" 1956) learned this the hard way. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Krell

... and remember the Krell.



 
Jul 29, 2006 at 7:32 PM Post #87 of 90
Quote:

Originally Posted by slwiser
Wonder of wonders, one of my all time favorite movies. I watch this on DVD every once in a while.

Team Krell....

A great precursor to the Star Trek franchise. In the first opening scenes you seen so much of where Star Trek came from.



I know.
evil_smiley.gif
 
Aug 5, 2006 at 9:24 PM Post #89 of 90
Quote:

Originally Posted by Dr.Sade
QUOTE=drarthurwells

"No mystery after all."

Your masterpiece of conciseness makes the "Universe in a Nutshell" (Hawking) look like the " Remembrance of Things Past" (Proust).

Unfortunately, you can NEVER convince the Ultimate Solipsist (Me) that this Mind Set/Paradigm isn't just another illusion created by My Mind. The mystery of My Self Consciousness will ALWAYS remain a mystery. My Mind PRECEDES the concepts of "brain", "the scientific method", "an infinity of infinities", and "cosmic consciousness". From My Point of View this is just another complicated mathematical model for My amusement. There might always be something that is, beyond Myself, beyond My current limited abilities to experience, UNKNOWABLE, THE VOID, a mystery, or just the hidden part of My Mind.

[The 6th character from the "6 Characters in Search of an Author" (Pirandello) told me that I'm the hidden 8th character. I've never met the 7th character. On second thought maybe I have.]

The Julian Barbour model of physics claims that the common view of time, motion, and change (that they are connected points on a continuous line) is an illusion; continuous flux/flow is an illusion. He replaces this common view with discrete discontinuous structures called "time capsules". These independent "time capsule" structures remain independent in stasis. Perhaps probability issues are what bundles these otherwise disparate "time capsules" into a coherent whole (world view)? Perhaps, a mind/"brain" perceives only the bundles of "time capsules" it can perceive because this mind/"brain" and these "time capsules" "resonate" together or fit together like pieces in a jigsaw puzzle?

Your model of physics has similarities to his model (no need for "repositioning material events in space" in his model though). In the Barbour model a "mind/'brain'/observer" + the discrete bundles of "time capsules" TOGETHER replace your "repositioning of material events in space". The Ultimate Mind in both models seems to be doing the blinking.

As you imply, the objects we see on a movie screen are't really moving; they aren't even really objects.

For me the illusion of motion and objects in a 3D space-time that is created by a pixelated stereoscopic LCD screen is even more apt. The illusion is created by turning on and off bundles of pixels, but in a non-random way. The chosen sequence of pixelated on/off states exploits the specific way our brain organizes and interpretes patterns of visual stimuli.

Hmmm, what may look like a random noisy pixelated image to us might look like a centerfold to some alien.
lambda.gif


Hmmm, the discovery of monster (oscillating, fractal) functions started the whole paradigm shift from describing calculus (math of change) in "continuous space/time" terms to "discrete sets and numerical completeness" terms. Monster functions violate space/time continuity; they describe some "oscillating states". [f(x) = sin (1/x); f(x) = x sin (1/x)].

In fact, cryptography (like the pixelated LCD) also exploits the way our brains process stimuli/information. What looks offhand like noisy gibberish is really a meaningful message hiding behind innumerable layers of linked disinformation transformations that is based on the way our brain processes language.

Hmmm, to an alien, one of the disinformation layers by chance might carry a meaningful (to the alien) message which says "would you stop with the crop circles and cattle mutilations, Marvin!"
lambda.gif


Hmmm, perhaps any given noise is meaningful/coherent to some existing or potentially existing "brain". What looks random/disorganized/chaotic to us may look organized to "them."
lambda.gif


Pure absolute chaos/noise implies it is not possible for any conceivable mind/brain even in principle to perceive order.

What IS the relation of Chaos to Order, Reality to Illusion, Relative to Absolute, Subjective to Objective, Mind to Matter/Brain/Body, the Self, the Soul?

If everything is relative and nothing is absolute then isn't everything an illusion?

redface.gif
Every successive model of physics has, so far, pointed to the illusions of the previous physics model.

blink.gif
Hmmm, the trend is an ever expanding sequence of nested illusions (virtual realities).

This could be the basis for a new Information Theory model called "The Big Bang of BS".
biggrin.gif


Julian Barbour calls his model of physics "Platonia" which is reminiscent of Plato's theory that "IDEAS" are real and everything else is a copy of an IDEA. Today we would call these "copies" Virtual Realities. With today's technology in mind perhaps Julian Barbour should have called his physics model "Pixaria".

Hmmm, in what level of "virtual reality" are "we" when we dream, lucid dream, meditate, or are on drugs?

Hmmm, whatever hypnosis is, it seems to be the cheapest most direct way of creating virtual realities.
evil_smiley.gif


Hmmm, role playing games might be the second cheapest way of creating virtual realities.

But, come to think of it, as soon as I have a conscious thought via language, symbols, or pictures I have created an intellectual virtual reality. Besides abstract concepts, the two other building blocks of virtual reality are sensations and emotions. All we can consciously experience reduces to three qualities (Qualia?): sensations, emotions, and concepts.

blink.gif
Imagine a Mind that can experience more than our 3 "qualias" (sensations, emotions, concepts). What if there was an infinity of infinities of "qualias"?

confused.gif
Perhaps "all" the "time capsule" bundles in the stasis of Julian Barbour's "Platonia" can be thought of as a vast fixed (infinite?) relational (or object-oriented) database upon which relational queries are made by a mind/brain? This reminds me of the artificial intellegence computer programming language called PROLOG. Perhaps a PROLOG (relational) or c++ (object-oriented) model of "Platonia" could be written?

blink.gif
Maybe each "blink" of the "Ultimate Mind" is a relational query on the "Ultimate Database" (the Ultimate Mind itself)? Maybe omniscience can be defined as all possible "simultaneous" relational queries per blink? But how is it possible for the Ultimate Omniscient Mind to know THE UNKNOWABLE?

confused.gif
Is "The Universe" a futile attempt to answer the question, "What is THE UNKNOWABLE?
evil_smiley.gif


blink.gif
By maximizing the diversity of the universe, you know what THE UNKNOWABLE isn't. THE UNKNOWABLE is NOT whatever is known, so you know at least it's not the known universe. It seems to be whatever it is you can't say about it. It's beyond language and conscious experience. But since it's beyond linguistic descriptions you can't even say that about it. You can't even call it an "it". ... and you certanly can't call "it" "THE UNKNOWABLE". My lips are sealed.
plainface.gif


blink.gif
Hmmm, there is a current conflict in the "virtual" world of theoretical physics between physics models that retain the current notions of measurement/prediction and physics models that would either extend the current notions of measurement/prediction or abandon the requirement of measurement/prediction entirely.

blink.gif
For example, those who espouse "remote viewing" would claim a team of expert "remote viewers" can just "remote view" the answer to any question directly. If the universe was "really" static, in stasis (not in flux/changing), then a "remote view" would be like doing a relational query on a static relational database. So there is possibly a connection between Julian Barbour's model of physics ("Platonia") and remote viewing. Maybe the "re-engineered" "quantum consciousness" (see below), the "NEW OMNISCIENT OMNIPOTENT YOU", can "remote view" the answers to all questions without breaking a sweat?

confused.gif
If we "remote viewed" the answer to the the question, "What is the "general transient response" of the SONY SA5000?", what would be the answer? [See previous post on the definition
of "general transient response".]

If we remote viewed the query, "Was the Sony Qualia headphone an outgrowth of the Sony ESP Lab research?", what would be the answer?

blink.gif
This all meshes into the "Quantum Mind" theory of consciousness.


The article below says,

"...literally anything at all can be materialized and brought into being..."

http://www.geocities.com/iona_m/Cosm...onEgineer.html

(Compare to the Krell "Ultimate Headphone" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Krell.)

(Compare to the Cult of Cthulhu who say ...


"...in Chaos Magic, it doesn't matter what or who one focuses their energy on. If you create your own "reality", then that is the universe you live in."

"...humanity ... a kind of mistake. An abnormality which has potential (at times), but is mostly worthless and repugnant."

"Our goals are to bring the Old Ones back. To awaken the Ancient Things from outside of space and time. And also to awaken them inside ourselves."

"And eventually, of course, we want to destroy "reality" and take over the world."

"...the Cult of Cthulhu is evil. Why? Because we create our own morality and ethics. We choose for ourselves and do what we must to benefit ourselves. Cultists are admittedly selfish beings, all humans are. The Will To Power is a singular philosophy which drives us."
very_evil_smiley.gif


"...there were certain barriers and obstacles which didn't necessarily have to be there. I've always disliked authority, and I see the generally accepted views of "reality" as the greatest authority of all. And I laugh in its face. It only has power because everyone, more or less, agrees with it."

"...who has not explored the temptation of summoning beings that should never be evoked – those that lie not dead, but sleeping and waiting.")

The article below says,

"...ANY KIND OF FIELD CAN BE TURNED INTO ANY OTHER KIND OF FIELD ...In the new approach, the mind may be considered a special virtual universe, and a thought a virtual object. The virtual state consists of multiply nested levels, each level progressively finer and more subtle. THESE SUBLEVELS ALSO CORRESPOND MATHEMATICALLY TO HIGHER GEOMETRICAL DIMENSIONS...Everything is essentially mind...TIME ITSELF IS NOTHING, TOTALLY NOTHING...IF ANY PART OF THIS VIRTUAL CHAOS CAN BE COLLECTED AND COHERED IN EVEN THE SLIGHTEST DEGREE, ANY AMOUNT OF OBSERVABLE FREE ENERGY CAN BE OBTAINED...IF ANY PART OF THIS VIRTUAL CHAOS CAN BE COLLECTED AND COHERED IN EVEN THE SLIGHTEST DEGREE, ANY AMOUNT OF OBSERVABLE FREE ENERGY CAN BE OBTAINED...THE MORE CHAOTIC THE DISORDER, THE GREATER THE STABILITY OF THE ORDERED PATTERNS THAT EMERGE. TOTAL DISORDER MUST INEVITABLY TURN INTO TOTAL ORDER...The secret of the universe is that it's alive...Thus the entire physical universe is totally outside any of its internal points, and totally inside each internal point as well. THE TOTAL INTERNAL IS IDENTICAL TO THE TOTAL EXTERNAL..."

http://www.geocities.com/iona_m/Cosm...Engineer2.html

The article below says,

"...According to the latest research, the universe is self-generating. It was preceded by and evolved from a quantum fluctuation of spacetime...The vacuum contains virtually infinite energy, even though the exact nature of this all-pervasive force is not known...But, the vacuum is not empty; it is a plenum or fullness. It is the basic, fundamental underlying reality and everything in the universe is its expression..."

http://www.geocities.com/iona_m/Cosm...ology2000.html

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_mind

http://www.qedcorp.com/pcr/pcr/mmq.html#hspace

"Lucifer" in the Sky With Diamonds http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...96287489458266

blink.gif
very_evil_smiley.gif


All this may be leading "us" to the same fate as the "Krell" (a.k.a. ancient Martians?).

The Krell had the "Ultimate Headphone".

See Dr. Morbius wearing the Krell "Ultimate Headphone" in the movie "Forbidden Planet" near the end of the movie.

In this picture, the Krell "Ultimate Headphone" system is on the left (the "head clamps" are disengaged):

http://scidiv.bcc.ctc.edu/LS/SF/Forb...lanet/fp08.jpg




http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Krell

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forbidden_Planet




...Look, up in the sky!

...It's a bird!

...It's a plane!

...It's a Higgs Field HE90!
 
Aug 10, 2006 at 12:52 AM Post #90 of 90
Research has demonstrated a linkage involving headphones using "nano-composite" materials, Roger Penrose's (famous physicist) quantum brain theories, and the human brain's neurology.

The human brain's neurons use microtubules called tubulin. Penrose's theory proposes that these tubulin can maintain (and spread to surrounding tubulin) quantum coherent superpositions that can spontaneously collapse (reach a critical threshold) and allow preconscious (subconscious) thought to emerge, i.e., switch on consciousness.

It was discovered (Sony ESP Lab?) that quantum coherent superposition can also possibly spread to "artificial tubulin", i.e., "nano-composite tubes". When these "nano-composite tubes" ("artificial tubulin") are used in a headphone diaphragm, they seem to enhance the sending/receiving of "telepathic thoughts" and they seem to enhance group "remote viewing". [The details are a big secret.]
cool.gif


Nano tubes are among the fastest known oscillators and oscillating states seem to be at the core of almost everything.

"One can envision the development of electromagnetic energy sources, the output of which can be pulsed, shaped, and focused, that can couple with the human body in a fashion that will allow one to prevent voluntary muscular movements, control emotions (and thus actions), produce sleep, transmit suggestions, interfere with both short-term and long-term memory, produce an experience set, and delete an experience set. It would also appear possible to create high fidelity speech in the human body, raising the possibility of covert suggestion and psychological direction...Thus, it may be possible to 'talk' to selected adversaries in a fashion that would be most disturbing to them."

United States Air Force Scientific Advisory Board, New World Vistas: Air and Space Power For The 21st Century



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roger_penrose

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Penrose_Interpretation

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Emperor%27s_New_Mind

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shadows..._Consciousness

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tubulin

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microtubules

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carbon_nanotube

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nano_technology

http://www.personal.rdg.ac.uk/~scsharip/tubes.htm

http://www.ipt.arc.nasa.gov/carbonnano.html

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cytoskeleton

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_computation

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grover%27s_algorithm

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deutsch-Jozsa_algorithm

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shor%27s_algorithm

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum...ion_processing

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telepathy

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Remote_viewing

http://www.fas.org/irp/program/collect/stargate.htm

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ed_Dames

http://www.mind-energy.net/archives/...aboratory.html

http://headlines.nerdworld.com/modul...rticle&sid=111

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seth_Lloyd

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Programming_the_Universe

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Deutsch

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lov_Grover

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_brain

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_superposition

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interpr...ntum_Mechanics

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State_(physics)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State_%...ter_science%29

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State_diagram

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Finite_state_machine

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virtual..._state_machine

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Program_state
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top