Transient Speed all that? | Page 5 | Headphone Reviews and Discussion - Head-Fi.org

Dr.Sade · Jul 24, 2006 at 9:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by drarthurwells
- to maintain the equilibrium - so a change in one constant would produce a balancing change in another.

This is one of the keys.

These 20 or more fundamental physical constants are in fact changing (a Big secret); yet the the universe (as we know it; dualistic) is still here (for now).

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dualism

...so these 20 or more constants aren't really constants; they are really variables (with special characteristics) that are connected in an equation (which balances them) that equals an unspecified value.

What is this equation? What is this unspecified value?

The 20 or more constants:

http://www.bioinfo.rpi.edu/~zukerm/constants.pdf

Another key.

These 20 or more "constants" appeared constant because they were being observed (measured) from a specific point of view. But, unbeknownst to subsequent observers, the "POINT of VIEW" they were doing the observing (measuring) in changed so now the "constants" appear changed.

What is the equation(s) that desribes this?

Dualism Links:

http://moebius.psy.ed.ac.uk/~dualism/papers/brains.html

http://redshift.vif.com/JournalFiles...F/V12N1YER.pdf

http://redshift.vif.com/JournalFiles...F/V12N1YER.pdf

http://www.marxists.org/reference/su...e/heisenb2.htm

http://zebu.uoregon.edu/~js/21st_cen...res/lec12.html

http://socrates.berkeley.edu/~kihlst...ans02_long.htm

http://abyss.uoregon.edu/~js/ast122/lectures/lec05.html

http://pedia.nodeworks.com/D/DU/DUA/Dualism

http://scott.brisbane.id.au/philosop...r_dualism.html

http://physicsmathforums.com/showthread.php?t=250

http://urss.ru/cgi-bin/db.pl?cp=&pag...ang=en&list=36

http://www.integralscience.org/psyche-physis.html

http://www.qedcorp.com/pcr/pcr/mansfeld.html

http://www-personal.umich.edu/~lorma...%20Dualism.htm

http://www.custance.org/Library/MIND/chapter2.html

http://www.beotel.yu/~gmarjanovic/

http://www.newdualism.org/papers/E.H...r/Dualism.html

http://www.utm.edu/research/iep/d/dualism.htm

http://www.onepositive.com/dualism.htm

http://concise.britannica.com/ebc/article-9052812

http://website.lineone.net/~kwelos/materialism.htm

http://www.artsci.wustl.edu/~philos/...t/dualism.html

Dr.Sade · Jul 24, 2006 at 9:20 PM

One factual principle of anti-gravity is this:

Energy (e.g., temperature) and pressure alter gravitational pull.

By creating and controlling "Higgs Field(s)", a negative gravitational pressure is created in a specific area. This creates a repulsive gravitational force (a push instead of a pull) which effectively creates "anti-gravity" in a specific area.

This makes the 1 ton diaphragm dance.

This principle, in the future, could be used to make "weightless" headphone diaphragms.

So all you need are "Higgs Field(s)" on a chip.

Related links:

Cosmological constant:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmological_constant

http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/cosmo_constant.html

http://pancake.uchicago.edu/~carroll/encyc/

http://super.colorado.edu/~michaele/Lambda/lambda.html

http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/m_uni/uni_101accel.html

http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/phys...lConstant.html

Higgs Field:

http://www.p-i-a.com/Magazine/Issue10/Physics_10.htm

http://www.sciencenetlinks.com/sci_update.cfm?DocID=28

http://www.nada.kth.se/~asa/Game/BigIdeas/higgs.html

http://www.phy.uct.ac.za/courses/phy...cle/higgs5.htm

http://www.phy.uct.ac.za/courses/phy...cle/higgs1.htm

http://www.openquestions.com/oq-ph008.htm

http://www.physicsforums.com/showthr...threadid=39798

http://www.calphysics.org/inertia.html

http://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=104264

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread24931/pg1

http://blueflag.phys.yorku.ca/what_is_higgs.html

http://www.zen45800.zen.co.uk/projex5/page3.htm

http://particleadventure.org/particl...ss/masses.html

http://www.normanallan.com/Sci/higgs.htm

http://www.physicspost.com/articles.php?articleId=39

http://www.wbabin.net/physics/graudis.htm

http://www.advancedphysics.org/forum...read.php?t=514

http://www.citebase.org/abstract/?id...ant-ph/9807087

http://www.citebase.org/abstract/?id...hep-th/9801040

http://www.time.com/time/europe/maga...stforward.html

http://www.specularium.org/index.php...d=33&Itemid=59

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Field_%28physics%29

Gravity:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravity

http://www.grantchronicles.com/astro09.htm

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Higgs

http://www.particlephysics.ac.uk/new...-particle.html

Anti-gravity:

http://www.aeronautics.ru/archive/gr...gravitsapa.htm

Dr.Sade · Jul 24, 2006 at 10:07 PM

Cheap energy is already here (a Big secret).

The principle of cheap energy (in this case) is that the more energy you have the more energy you get.

Anti-gravity can be (and IS being) converted into "free energy". Probably, this can be done anywhere in the universe that we can inhabit.

The more Higgs Field energy devices (first big ones, later small ones) you create, the more Higgs Field energy devices and "free energy" you get; that is, as the the number of Higgs Field energy devices grows exponentially so does the amount of available "free energy" since the process can feed off it's own INCREASING energy production.

[Hmmm. The dualistic OTHER side is probably also making the Higgs Field(s) Ultimate Doomsday Universe Bomb. I can't win for losing.

]

Anyway, once the critical number of Higgs field devices have been made, you no longer need to depend on oil (an illusion; a false issue).

Now I can plug my amplifier into my Higgs Field energy device.

Zero-point energy:

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/ar...TICLE_ID=28473

http://www.thebooktree.com/free_energy_antigravity.html

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Ze...energy/Archive

http://superstringtheory.com/forum/d...sages2/71.html

http://womanebooks.com/ASTROEBO/antigravity.htm

http://freeenergynews.com/Directory/AntiGravity/

Dr.Sade · Jul 25, 2006 at 12:21 AM

Links to strange attractors:

http://www.calresco.org/pic5/img5a.htm

http://www.alunw.freeuk.com/chaos.html

http://home.netcom.com/~bitart/chaos/index.htm

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strange_attractor

http://hypertextbook.com/chaos/21.shtml

http://www.pha.jhu.edu/~ldb/seminar/attractors.html

http://www.allrite.com.au/science/science/sa.htm

http://sprott.physics.wisc.edu/sa.htm

http://www.pifmagazine.com/2000/09/c_weem1.php3

http://www.softlab.ntua.gr/Miscellan...faq-doc-5.html

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lorenz_attractor

http://www.faqs.org/faqs/fractal-faq/section-5.html

http://www.iit.edu/~krawczyk/rjkbrdg03.pdf

http://www.math.nyu.edu/~lsy/papers/mechanics-chaos.pdf

http://mathforum.org/library/view/3932.html

http://personal.vsnl.com/crajesh/

http://www.hiddendimension.com/Stran...tors_Main.html

http://journal-ci.csse.monash.edu.au...han/node6.html

http://www.worldscibooks.com/chaos/2796.htm

Quote:

I see teleological causality best exemplified in the action of strange attractors in organizing an imbalanced or chaotic system - something pulling events toward a purpose instead of pushing them blindly - again represented mathematically as a strange attractor - strange because it is an unknown mechanism.

This is what keeps the universe from falling about. DRARTHURWELLS

Dr.Sade · Jul 26, 2006 at 7:32 PM

So "Strange Attractors" create ORDER out of CHAOS (Ordo ab Chao):

http://www.fractalwisdom.com/Fractal.../fourattr.html

http://library.thinkquest.org/12170/

http://library.thinkquest.org/12170/history/lorenz.html

http://www.ldeo.columbia.edu/~mspieg...ms/node24.html

http://forums.devarticles.com/scienc...com-13929.html

88888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888 888888888888888

http://altreligion.about.com/library.../aa111604a.htm

88888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888 888888888888888

Dr.Sade · Jul 26, 2006 at 8:55 PM

QUOTE=drarthurwells

"No mystery after all."

"Every time I "blink" they pull me back in." [Godfather 3 or 2?]

...and this post is from which Julian Barbour;
...the J.B. from "frame" #666,666,666 or the J.B. from "frame" #777,777,777?

[1]http://www.edge.org/3rd_culture/barbour/barbour_p1.html

[2]http://www.edge.org/3rd_culture/bios/barbour.html

[3]http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/0...lance&n=266239

Your masterpiece of conciseness makes the "Universe in a Nutshell" (Hawking) look like the " Remembrance of Things Past" (Proust).

Unfortunately, you can NEVER convince the Ultimate Solipsist (Me) that this Mind Set/Paradigm isn't just another illusion created by My Mind. The mystery of My Self Consciousness will ALWAYS remain a mystery. My Mind PRECEDES the concepts of "brain", "the scientific method", "an infinity of infinities", and "cosmic consciousness". From My Point of View this is just another complicated mathematical model for My amusement. There might always be something that is, beyond Myself, beyond My current limited abilities to experience, UNKNOWABLE, THE VOID, a mystery, or just the hidden part of My Mind.

[]http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/solipsism]

[The 6th character from the "6 Characters in Search of an Author" (Pirandello) told me that I'm the hidden 8th character. I've never met the 7th character. On second thought maybe I have.]

http://www.swiftpapers.com/essay/6_c...n_a-28968.html

http://www.allreaders.com/Topics/info_25975.asp

http://www.oppapers.com/read.php?id=41552

http://www.learmedia.ca/product_info...roducts_id/217

http://www.finnbritplayers.com/6characters/

The Julian Barbour model of physics claims that the common view of time, motion, and change (that they are connected points on a continuous line) is an illusion; continuous flux/flow is an illusion. He replaces this common view with discrete discontinuous structures called "time capsules". These independent "time capsule" structures remain independent in stasis. Perhaps probability issues are what bundles these otherwise disparate "time capsules" into a coherent whole (world view)? Perhaps, a mind/"brain" perceives only the bundles of "time capsules" it can perceive because this mind/"brain" and these "time capsules" "resonate" together or fit together like pieces in a jigsaw puzzle?

Your model of physics has similarities to his model (no need for "repositioning material events in space" in his model though). In the Barbour model a "mind/'brain'/observer" + the discrete bundles of "time capsules" TOGETHER replace your "repositioning of material events in space". The Ultimate Mind in both models seems to be doing the blinking.

As you imply, the objects we see on a movie screen are't really moving; they aren't even really objects.

For me the illusion of motion and objects in a 3D space-time that is created by a pixelated stereoscopic LCD screen is even more apt. The illusion is created by turning on and off bundles of pixels, but in a non-random way. The chosen sequence of pixelated on/off states exploits the specific way our brain organizes and interpretes patterns of visual stimuli.

Hmmm, what may look like a random noisy pixelated image to us might look like a centerfold to some alien.

Stereoscopic Virtual Reality:

http://www.stereo3d.com/3dhome.htm

http://www.newscientisttech.com/arti...onference.html

Hmmm, the discovery of monster (oscillating, fractal) functions started the whole paradigm shift from describing calculus (math of change) in "continuous space/time" terms to discrete "sets and numerical completeness" terms. Monster functions violate space/time continuity; they describe some "oscillating states". [f(x) = sin (1/x); f(x) = x sin (1/x).]

http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Oscillation.html

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Where_M...ics_Comes_From

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karl_weierstrass

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weierstrass_function

http://mathworld.wolfram.com/WeierstrassFunction.html

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dedekind

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dedekind_cut

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hermann_Weyl

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pythagoras

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irrational_number

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commens...mathematics%29

http://www.cut-the-knot.org/proofs/sq_root.shtml

http://mathworld.wolfram.com/IrrationalNumber.html

In fact, cryptography (like the pixelated LCD) also exploits the way our brains process stimuli/information. What looks offhand like noisy gibberish is really a meaningful message hiding behind innumerable layers of linked disinformation transformations that is based on the way our brain processes language.

Hmmm, to an alien, one of the disinformation layers by chance might carry a meaningful (to the alien) message which says "would you stop with the crop circles and cattle mutilations, Marvin!"

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cryptography

Kryptos:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kryptos

http://www.kryptos-cia.com/

http://brainyplanet.com/index.php/Kr...47a1d6d275c326

http://www.iphotofind.com/Kryptos.html

http://www.diggersrealm.com/mt/archives/000701.html

http://math.ucsd.edu/~crypto/Project...ng/index3.html

http://www.ussrback.com/crypto/nsa/k...cia-art-jg.htm

http://filebox.vt.edu/users/batman/kryptos.html

http://www.cryptofone.com/kryptos3.html

http://www.schneier.com/blog/archive...yptos_scu.html

http://elonka.com/kryptos/faq.html

http://www.elonka.com/kryptos/Correc...ouncement.html

http://www.elonka.com/kryptos/

http://www.wired.com/news/culture/0,66334-0.html

http://www.geocities.com/pf008/kryptos/

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Kryptos/

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/s...toryId=4684720

http://www.npr.org/programs/atc/feat...6.kryptos.html

http://realmoftwelve.fateback.com/

http://kryptos.arcticus.com/

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv.../kryptos19.htm

http://www.und.nodak.edu/org/crypto/...os/Kryptos.txt

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread148001/pg1

http://members.aol.com/SciRealm/KryptosDetails.html

http://members.aol.com/scirealm/KryptosSolutions.html

http://www.godlikeproductions.com/bb...owdate=4/24/06

Hmmm, perhaps any given noise is meaningful/coherent to some existing or potentially existing "brain". What looks random/disorganized/chaotic to us may look organized to "them."

Every successive model of physics has, so far, pointed to the illusions of the previous physics model.

Hmmm, the trend is an ever expanding sequence of nested illusions (virtual realities).

This could be the basis for a new Information Theory model called "The Big Bang of BS".

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypnosis

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Post_hypnotic_suggestion

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypnagogia

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Threshold_consciousness

Hmmm, role playing games might be the second cheapest way of creating virtual realities.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Role_playing

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Role_playing_games

http://www.rpg.net/oracle/essays/rpgoverview.html

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chaosium

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cthulhu

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Call_of...laying_game%29

http://www.cultofcthulhu.net/

http://www.chaosium.com/

But, come to think of it, as soon as I have a conscious thought via language, symbols, or pictures I have created an intellectual virtual reality. Besides abstract concepts, the two other building blocks of virtual reality are sensations and emotions. All we can consciously experience reduces to three qualities (Qualia?): sensations, emotions, and concepts.

Imagine a Mind that can experience more than our 3 "qualias" (sensations, emotions, concepts). What if there was an infinity of infinities of "qualias"?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continuum_hypothesis

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qualia

http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/qualia-inverted/

http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/qualia-knowledge/

http://ase.tufts.edu/cogstud/papers/chalmers.htm

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Synesthesia

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proprioception

Maybe each "blink" of the "Ultimate Mind" is a relational query on the "Ultimate Database" (the Ultimate Mind itself)? Maybe omniscience can be defined as all possible "simultaneous" relational queries per blink? But how is it possible for the Ultimate Omniscient Mind to know THE UNKNOWABLE?

Is "The Universe" a futile attempt to answer the question, "What is THE UNKNOWABLE?

By maximizing the diversity of the universe, you know what THE UNKNOWABLE isn't. THE UNKNOWABLE is NOT whatever is known, so you know at least it's not the known universe. It seems to be whatever it is you can't say about it. It's beyond language and conscious experience. But since it's beyond linguistic descriptions you can't even say that about it. You can't even call it an "it". ... and you certanly can't call "it" "THE UNKNOWABLE". My lips are sealed.

Hmmm, there is a current conflict in the "virtual" world of theoretical physics between physics models that retain the current notions of measurement/prediction and physics models that would either extend the current notions of measurement/prediction or abandon the requirement of measurement/prediction entirely.

For example, those who espouse "remote viewing" would claim a team of expert "remote viewers" can just "remote view" the answer to any question directly. If the universe was "really" static, in stasis (not in flux/changing), then a "remote view" would be like doing a relational query on a static relational database. So there is possibly a connection between Julian Barbour's model of physics ("Platonia") and remote viewing. Maybe the "re-engineered" "quantum consciousness" (see below), the "NEW OMNISCIENT OMNIPOTENT YOU", can "remote view" the answers to all questions without breaking a sweat?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Omniscience

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Omnipotence

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Problem_of_evil

http://www.chabad.org/search/keyword.asp?kid=1229

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Omnipotence_Paradox

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Remote_viewing

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ed_Dames

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Astral_projection

This all meshes into the "Quantum Mind" theory of consciousness.

The article below says,

"...literally anything at all can be materialized and brought into being..."

http://www.geocities.com/iona_m/Cosm...onEgineer.html

(Compare to the Krell "Ultimate Headphone" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Krell.)

(Compare to the Cult of Cthulhu (see below) who say ...

"...in Chaos Magic, it doesn't matter what or who one focuses their energy on. If you create your own "reality", then that is the universe you live in."

"...humanity ... a kind of mistake. An abnormality which has potential (at times), but is mostly worthless and repugnant."

"Our goals are to bring the Old Ones back. To awaken the Ancient Things from outside of space and time. And also to awaken them inside ourselves."

"And eventually, of course, we want to destroy "reality" and take over the world."

"...the Cult of Cthulhu is evil. Why? Because we create our own morality and ethics. We choose for ourselves and do what we must to benefit ourselves. Cultists are admittedly selfish beings, all humans are. The Will To Power is a singular philosophy which drives us."

"...there were certain barriers and obstacles which didn't necessarily have to be there. I've always disliked authority, and I see the generally accepted views of "reality" as the greatest authority of all. And I laugh in its face. It only has power because everyone, more or less, agrees with it."

"...who has not explored the temptation of summoning beings that should never be evoked – those that lie not dead, but sleeping and waiting.")

http://phenomena.cinescape.com/0/edi...id=85&sub_id=0

The article below says,

"...ANY KIND OF FIELD CAN BE TURNED INTO ANY OTHER KIND OF FIELD ...In the new approach, the mind may be considered a special virtual universe, and a thought a virtual object. The virtual state consists of multiply nested levels, each level progressively finer and more subtle. THESE SUBLEVELS ALSO CORRESPOND MATHEMATICALLY TO HIGHER GEOMETRICAL DIMENSIONS...Everything is essentially mind...TIME ITSELF IS NOTHING, TOTALLY NOTHING...IF ANY PART OF THIS VIRTUAL CHAOS CAN BE COLLECTED AND COHERED IN EVEN THE SLIGHTEST DEGREE, ANY AMOUNT OF OBSERVABLE FREE ENERGY CAN BE OBTAINED...IF ANY PART OF THIS VIRTUAL CHAOS CAN BE COLLECTED AND COHERED IN EVEN THE SLIGHTEST DEGREE, ANY AMOUNT OF OBSERVABLE FREE ENERGY CAN BE OBTAINED...THE MORE CHAOTIC THE DISORDER, THE GREATER THE STABILITY OF THE ORDERED PATTERNS THAT EMERGE. TOTAL DISORDER MUST INEVITABLY TURN INTO TOTAL ORDER...The secret of the universe is that it's alive...Thus the entire physical universe is totally outside any of its internal points, and totally inside each internal point as well. THE TOTAL INTERNAL IS IDENTICAL TO THE TOTAL EXTERNAL..."

http://www.geocities.com/iona_m/Cosm...Engineer2.html

The article below says,

"...According to the latest research, the universe is self-generating. It was preceded by and evolved from a quantum fluctuation of spacetime...The vacuum contains virtually infinite energy, even though the exact nature of this all-pervasive force is not known...But, the vacuum is not empty; it is a plenum or fullness. It is the basic, fundamental underlying reality and everything in the universe is its expression..."

http://www.geocities.com/iona_m/Cosm...ology2000.html

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hidden_variables

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bell%27s_theorem

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bell_test_experiments

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bohm_interpretation

http://www.qedcorp.com/pcr/pcr/mmq.html#hspace

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_mind

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G%C3%B6...teness_Theorem

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-reference

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Bohm

http://www.biocrawler.com/encycloped...apsing_theorem

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Many-minds_interpretation

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Many-mi...inity_of_minds

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consciousness

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mind

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theory_of_mind

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mind-body_problem

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_will

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dualism...phy_of_mind%29

http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Consciousness_studies

http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Conscio..._consciousness

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simulated_consciousness

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space-t..._consciousness

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conscio...auses_collapse

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electro..._consciousness

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subject..._of_experience

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philosophy_of_perception

Berkely Lab Lecture:

http://www.qedcorp.com/pcr/pcr/mmq.html#hspace

http://www.thinkingallowed.com/4jsarfatti.html

http://www.qedcorp.com/pcr/pcr/Endtime.html

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jack_Sarfatti

http://www.qedcorp.com/pcr/pcr/sar.html

http://www.well.com/user/sarfatti/

http://www.disinfo.com/archive/pages/article/id773/pg1/

http://stardrive.org/25/sld007.htm

http://www.stardrive.org/25/sld001.htm

http://stardrive.org/25/sld002.htm

http://stardrive.org/25/

"Lucifer" in the Sky With Diamonds http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...96287489458266

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lucifer

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Devil

http://www.occultopedia.com/l/lucifer.htm

http://www.orderofthemorningstar.net/home.html

All this may be leading "us" to the same fate as the "Krell" (a.k.a. ancient Martians?).

The Krell had the "Ultimate Headphone".

See Dr. Morbius wearing the Krell "Ultimate Headphone" in the movie "Forbidden Planet" near the end of the movie.

In this picture, the Krell "Ultimate Headphone" system is on the left (the "head clamps" are disengaged):

http://scidiv.bcc.ctc.edu/LS/SF/Forb...lanet/fp08.jpg

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Krell

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forbidden_Planet

Dr.Sade · Jul 26, 2006 at 9:30 PM

1) Cosmic Consciousness = Non-Conscious Mind = Chaos = Everything = THE VOID (all dualities that cancel each other out [(+1)+(-1) =0]) = Absolute Reality

2) Self-Conscious Mind (Observer/Subjectivity/Relativity/Quantum) = Order (Out of Chaos) = Illusion = Virtual Reality.

3) Any model of physics (Multiple Minds/Observers/Objectivity/Relativity/Quantum) = Order (Out of Chaos) = Illusion = Virtual Reality.

4) Only THE VOID is Absolute Reality = THE UNKNOWABLE.

..."the horror"...("The Heart of Darkness", by Conrad)

http://www.123helpme.com/view.asp?id=14568

slwiser · Jul 26, 2006 at 9:56 PM

To show how shallow I am, what does all this have to do with headphones?

The answer is that any headphone that produces sound is a good one and one that has no sound is a bad one? Just guessing.

And at any time the best of headphones can be bad when not plugged in and even the worst headphones can sound at least as good as the best when compared with a silence headphone, right?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dr.Sade
1) Cosmic Consciousness = Non-Conscious Mind = Chaos = Everything (all dualities that cancel each other out [(+1)+(-1) =0]) = The VOID = Reality

2) Self-Consicous Mind (Observer/Subjectivity)) = Order (Out of Chaos) = Illusion

3) Any model of physics (Multiple Minds/Observers/Objectivity) = Order (Out of Chaos) = Illusion.

4) Only THE VOID is Reality.

..."the horror"...("The Heart of Darkness", by Conrad)

http://www.123helpme.com/view.asp?id=14568

Dr.Sade · Jul 26, 2006 at 10:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by slwiser
To show how shallow I am, what does all this have to do with headphones?

The answer is that any headphone that produces sound is a good one and one that has no sound is a bad one? Just guessing.

And at any time the best of headphones can be bad when not plugged in and even the worst headphones can sound at least as good as the best when compared with a silence headphone, right?

It means that the virtual reality of a live performance that the headphone system simulates is an illusion and the headphone system itself (as it relates to you) is an illusion (another level of virtual reality). Ultimately the Absolutely Real headphone system can NEVER be heard and the Absolutely Real live performance (not the lower level live performance; also an illusion; another level of virtual reality) can NEVER be heard.

Sorry about your wallet.

slwiser · Jul 26, 2006 at 10:19 PM

Thanks, that makes everything much more clear.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dr.Sade
It means that the virtual reality of a live performance that the headphones simulate is an illusion and the headphones themselves (as they relate to you) are an illusion. Ultimately the real headphones can NEVER be heard and even the live performance (also an illusion) can never be heard.

tourmaline · Jul 26, 2006 at 10:20 PM

Getting freudian here huh?!

You can hear if the attack, say someone hits the drum with the stick, is fast or slow. Fast is closer to the real thing. Also good interlinks help with this, some interlinks are better in this regard then others! Quote:

Originally Posted by Dr.Sade
It means that the virtual reality of a live performance that the headphones simulate is an illusion and the headphones themselves (as they relate to you) are an illusion. Ultimately the real headphones can NEVER be heard and even the real live performance (also an illusion) can never be heard.

slwiser · Jul 26, 2006 at 10:28 PM

You sure Freud is the right guy. This is very existential. Wasn't that these guys: Sartre, Nietzsche, Kierkegaard, Camus, and Heidegger.

And no I don't know what I am talking about.

Quote:

Originally Posted by tourmaline
Getting freudian here huh?!

Dr.Sade · Jul 27, 2006 at 9:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tourmaline
Getting freudian here huh?!

You can hear if the attack, say someone hits the drum with the stick, is fast or slow. Fast is closer to the real thing. Also good interlinks help with this, some interlinks are better in this regard then others!

There are an infinite number of layers/levels of illusion (virtual realities) between YOU and the ABSOLUTELY REAL thing. What you are calling the "real thing" is just another nested "level" of illusion (virtual reality). Even if you take a narrow materialistic point of view, imagine ALL the "actual" "signal processesing", "physics", and "brain activity" that is (claimed by "the scientists" to be) going on between the "real thing" (one level of illusion/virtual reality) and you. You are just comparing (one level of illusion/virtual reality) "the fast" attack to a "faster attack" (at another level of illusion/virtual reality). The "live performance" itself is an illusion but at another level of virtual reality. The issue is deeper than you ever imagined. Imagine what YOU are!

Freud dealt with the SUBconscious. I intentionally used the word "non-conscious".

http://www.neuroconsult.at/

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subconscious

Dr.Sade · Jul 27, 2006 at 9:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by slwiser
You sure Freud is the right guy. This is very existential. Wasn't that these guys: Sartre, Nietzsche, Kierkegaard, Camus, and Heidegger.

And no I don't know what I am talking about.

You are both right. Freud's subconscious relates to an individual's non-conscious "mental" activity. Jung's collective unconscious is the "DNA" (archtypes) that structures human psyches in general. Existentialism relates to the "Ultimate Solipsist."

Dr.Sade · Jul 27, 2006 at 10:53 PM

Will String Theory (another illusion?) be replaced by Non-Commutative Geometry?

http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?cha...E483414B7F4945

Dr.Sade

100+ Head-Fier

Dr.Sade

100+ Head-Fier

Dr.Sade

100+ Head-Fier

Dr.Sade

100+ Head-Fier

Dr.Sade

100+ Head-Fier

Dr.Sade

100+ Head-Fier

Dr.Sade

100+ Head-Fier

slwiser

Headphoneus Supremus

Dr.Sade

100+ Head-Fier

slwiser

Headphoneus Supremus

tourmaline

Headphoneus Supremus

slwiser

Headphoneus Supremus

Dr.Sade

100+ Head-Fier

Dr.Sade

100+ Head-Fier

Dr.Sade

100+ Head-Fier

Users who are viewing this thread