To Type-R or not to Type-R?

[Ctn]

Are we talking about Integras here :>

*walks away slowly*

 

[gloco]

Quote:

Originally posted by fiddler [/i]Anyway, I just re-recorded one of my MDs with my deck (MDS-JE530), so I had two copies: one recorded with 4.5 (on my portable) and one with Type-R. Sony is right when they say it's more "euphonious"! The treble is much more natural sounding, and it seems there's more "air" around each note.. it just sounds more spacious. The 4.5 recording sounds very plain in comparison. Dammit, now I'm going to have to re-record all my MDs on my deck!

You can thank me now

Hehehe, seriously, ya, i'm working thru re-recording all my fav cds to MD. I'm listening to The Doors: L.A. Woman and it never sounded better! Glad to see i'm not the only one, besides nallyvaico, who noticed a difference.

George

 

[gloco]

Quote:

Originally posted by Ctn Are we talking about Integras here :> *walks away slowly*

LOL, errrr....NO!

Minidisc...

 

[Ctn]

Quote:

Originally posted by gloco LOL, errrr....NO! Minidisc...

hehe I know, just adding some humor

I just love the 2000 model Type-R.

Im saving up for it

+ turbo :>

 

[gloco]

Quote:

Originally posted by Ctn hehe I know, just adding some humor I just love the 2000 model Type-R. Im saving up for it + turbo :>

Ohhh..Why you!

Type R...sounds snappy....

Type X .... Now thats a car!

 

[nallyvaico]

If Sony should ever upgrade its ATRAC version (I bet it should), I
think it would call it Type U - Ultimate!

 

[nallyvaico]

By the by, did anyone do comparison of Sony's recent ATRAC's vs Sharp's?

I did, a few years ago, compare Sony's Atrac 4.5 v Sharp's Atrac 5.0... Sharp was my major disappointment...

I wonder how Sony's Atrac at least 4.5 compares with Sharp... what? 7? 8.3?