Giogio
Bluetooth Guru
- Joined
- Nov 13, 2014
- Posts
- 1,419
- Likes
- 366
In my case I am only concerned with tags, I actually hate albums art. I delete them all and I find it annoying when some program almost force me to have that big thing there.
Know what's really interesting? I talked to a guy who was able to pass ABX tests comparing 24-bit, lossless 16-bit, and 256 kbps AAC, meaning that he could reliably tell the difference. Upon further inspection, I discovered that he used foobar2000 to convert the files. I recommended that he use dBpoweramp instead. After he converted the files with dBpoweramp, he could not tell them apart at all! Go figure.
still EAC does a decent job of tagging....Just dont opt for art and your good
Huh... you may have a very valid point, I use dB poweramp on my Desktop rig, and FooBar on my Laptop, though tbh my laptop isn't refferance by any means, so I've never made an attempt to ABX the quality between the two
still thanks for adding that in man
They should also be able to convert files that are identical. I suspect that the person I mentioned just had some settings activated in foobar2000 that were interfering with things.
It was probably a fluke:
Oh :/ well then... I guess were back to FooBar 2000 and EAC [with Tag&Rename if you want to "fine tune" your meta data]
pretty sure I already said that in this thread, though. hehe
You're acting like you're disappointed. lol. All thee programs should rip and convert files 100% accurately as long as the disc is not damaged. I vastly prefer dBpoweramp due to its features, interface, and ease of use...pretty sure I already said that in this thread, though. hehe