- Joined
- Aug 2, 2008
- Posts
- 5,408
- Likes
- 1,327
So other than that one error, do you folks agree with that assessment? That seems line up more with my understanding of the device vs the Wyrd.
I'm not trying to trash the Wyrd, I'm trying to understand if spending an extra $50 on the U12 will offer any actual benefit other than additional output formats. Or in the other direction, if the Wyrd is actually doing more for less (assuming your DAC has a USB input).
It depends. Sodaboy made an assumption that I said it was worse. I actually said "not be better or worse than stock USB implementation on DACs".
I'd say the Gustard is more likely a waste of money if you have something modern like the X-Sabre, PWD2, M51, NFB-7.32, etc. all those DACs have good USB implementations and need a top notch USB converter to beat the built-in one. Newer DACs like Vega or Yggy have excellent USB implementations where I felt even the use of a TOTL USB converter like OR5 or Berzerkly Alpha were slightly worse (again, this also depends upon your USB source - laptop USB out tends to suck.)
In general, I felt the Gustard was on the lower end of the chain of converters - at least with SPDIF. The order of things: Gustard < Ciuinas < OR5. The caveat is i2s, but there are only a handful of DACs that utilize i2s, and there is no standard for the pin outs (can you say kaboom or zapp!) Other converters are also offering i2s. There's the AGD USB converter now as another solution with i2s. I have not heard it though and I have my doubts because of that craptastic VIA chip. Keep in mind i2s but itself is no magic bullet. The implementation must actually sound good to begin with to take full potential of i2s. In other words, don't worry about i2s if you have to ask since the DAC you buy will probably 99% not have i2s or will explode 66% if you connect the i2s cables wrong pins. People who do i2s usually know exactly what they are doing - asking the manufacturers for pin-outs and even testing the pins themselves, and capable of making their own cables.
Finally, don't get fooled by parts specs. Lots of stuff sounds good on paper, but sounds craptastic (iBasso cough cough cough). It annoys the bejezus outta me when people do that. "The tranfo is inside the case of the Mustard, hence magnetic field mucking with the clocks." neener, neener, neener. "well it's encapsulated" neener, neener, "yeah with plastic" neener, neener. "Well the Mustard's regulation circuit sucks" neener, neener, "Well the USB power - Galvatron isolated it" neener, neener, "Well there's no such thing because one leg of the power ties back to ground in US electrical wiring" neener, neener, "Well Optimus Prime said so", etc. Lame arguments and lamer counter arguments about specs and implementation can go on and on. Proof is in listening and trying different combinations.
Now if you get a DAC with no USB input, and you want computer audio, obviously the Gustard would be a good value based choice.
If you get a fairly modern DAC with USB built-in, try the built-in USB out first. At this point in the game, if it works and sounds good, probably no need to waste another $200 for an unknown. Don't put the cart before the horse, especially if you are starting out and wanting to try out new DACs. USB has come a long long way with some of the newer chips. I actually feel the CMedia 6632A or even 6631A can compete with or exceed XMOS. XMOS seems to work really well with Sabre DACs though. But anyways what I am saying is that USB converters are like aftermarket intakes for cars. The majority of them don't do jack **** for most modern cars, or give you gains of 2hp.
I use both in my system. In my case, the Wyrd clears the power for the U12, which clears it further. I like both but I think in terms of pure value for money U12 > Wyrd. But I like having both
That's a good way to think about it. They are not mutually exclusive products.