thathertz
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Feb 21, 2008
- Posts
- 434
- Likes
- 14
That's for clearing that up. I appreciate your sincerity and honesty.
And we're cool too Purrin? I hope so. I woke up the other morning and thought 'oh screw what did i say.....'
That's for clearing that up. I appreciate your sincerity and honesty.
Assuming digital input - where I could use digital PEQ:
DAC
An MSB DAC or the AG-D M7/OR5. I'm still due for a shootout to see how close it may be. The MSB Analog may not be resolving enough for me. Unfortunately, I don't want to spend $20K for a better MSB. Getting an MSB DAC is like buying a Porsche. By the time I get all the options I want, the Cayman (the real Porsche since the 911 is so bloated now) is $120K.
AMP
Eddie Current 445, otherwise known as the "God Amp". Only five made in the first run. Don't know if there will be any more. 4 x 45 tubes. Will be running EML Meshes. Only 3 watts per channel.
SPEAKERS
A new high-efficiency open baffle design. The OB speakers you saw in the Bay Area Meet thread were a proof of concept using Moth Cicada drivers I had on hand and cheap $70 15" stamped frame woofers from PartsExpress. I slapped the thing together the week before the meet (although I had already done some of the design work / simluations keeping the Cicada drivers in mind months ago.)
I'd probably go a three for maybe four way for the final design. Aura NS18 18"woofer, Fostex FE208EZ 8" for mids, and Fostex FE108 4" for the highs. The 4" is a strange choice, but there isn't 2" driver / tweeter with the range and efficiency I want, unless of course Donald North designs one, which would be cool. I still need to evaluate a few more drivers to make a final decision. The Acoustic Elegance Dipole15/18 seem interesting as well. Since I would have digital EQ at my disposal, I would just run single caps and coils for the crossover circuits to keep them as simple as possible. Crossover components are evil.
The system would be bi-amped with the 445 powering the mids and treble. Reasonable priced but powerful solid-state (such as the Crest CA2 power amp) would handle the woofer amping duties.
proper power regulation should make any component sound better.
And we're cool too Purrin? I hope so. I woke up the other morning and thought 'oh screw what did i say.....'
Purrin, if you don't mind me asking...what would be the cost of your endgame system?
Also, do you think that realistically it's within your grasp?
God, I need a better job...
I have tested Hugo with and without Hydra-X.
I think the usb input from Hugo is very good on it's own.
I found MSB Analog Dac to be very resolving, not as resolving as signature but still very resolving. And it is resolving in a very natural way, nothing is pushed by force in front.
The transparency and details increase with the upgraded power source.
Yeah. We are cool. As I've said, I have a short memory. I would hope that you would understand where I am coming from by now.
I dunno. Maybe $20K-$30K with most of that going to the sources (TT and/or DAC). I'm all SET (no pun intended) with the main amp. The cheapest part would probably be the speakers because I would build my own design as I have been for some years now. Thank heavens top speaker drivers haven't gone the way of top headphone prices.
I have kids to feed, but I would say its within my grasp in 10 years, possibly sooner if I decide to move to a state with less taxation, lower home prices, and less powerful public sector unions.
I haven't heard that exact combo, but I don't see why it shouldn't pair well. Donald uses an old R2R tube based Sonic Frontiers CD Player at his meets which I suspect sounds more similar to the M7 than not. I've also heard SABRE based DACs with the Stratus, and the Stratus handles that well too. Donald had made some minor circuit changes recently to the Stratus, and although I haven't heard it in a while, I could swear there were some incremental improvements all across the board when I heard it again at the Bay Area meet.
I really like the Stratus. It ones of those amps that sounds good with almost anything you throw at it. Since you can roll 2A3 tubes (there are a TON of different kinds, not to mention the decent availability of vintage tubes), you can tweak the sounding to your liking according to your source and headphones.
Assuming digital input - where I could use digital PEQ:
DAC
An MSB DAC or the AG-D M7/OR5. I'm still due for a shootout to see how close it may be. The MSB Analog may not be resolving enough for me. Unfortunately, I don't want to spend $20K for a better MSB. Getting an MSB DAC is like buying a Porsche. By the time I get all the options I want, the Cayman (the real Porsche since the 911 is so bloated now) is $120K.
AMP
Eddie Current 445, otherwise known as the "God Amp". Only five made in the first run. Don't know if there will be any more. 4 x 45 tubes. Will be running EML Meshes. Only 3 watts per channel.
SPEAKERS
A new high-efficiency open baffle design. The OB speakers you saw in the Bay Area Meet thread were a proof of concept using Moth Cicada drivers I had on hand and cheap $70 15" stamped frame woofers from PartsExpress. I slapped the thing together the week before the meet (although I had already done some of the design work / simluations keeping the Cicada drivers in mind months ago.)
I'd probably go a three for maybe four way for the final design. Aura NS18 18"woofer, Fostex FE208EZ 8" for mids, and Fostex FE108 4" for the highs. The 4" is a strange choice, but there isn't 2" driver / tweeter with the range and efficiency I want, unless of course Donald North designs one, which would be cool. I still need to evaluate a few more drivers to make a final decision. The Acoustic Elegance Dipole15/18 seem interesting as well. Since I would have digital EQ at my disposal, I would just run single caps and coils for the crossover circuits to keep them as simple as possible. Crossover components are evil.
The system would be bi-amped with the 445 powering the mids and treble. Reasonable priced but powerful solid-state (such as the Crest CA2 power amp) would handle the woofer amping duties.
PLLXO’s splitting the amps? Keeps the crossover circuits simple, maximizes those 3 watts by focusing on the mids and highs, and enables a high quality source instead of multiple DAC’s after a digital/opamp based crossover.
So just wanted to point out that waiting for the ship to come in is not a requirement for this style system.