[bigshot]

I'm interested in the continuous focus for video on the new version of the D3000. I wonder if it performs as well with very long or third party lenses. I'd love a really good mirrorless still video hybrid camera.

 

[choka]

 
Quote:

I could care less about dx lenses.  It's nice they have a faster 85mm but Canon has a 1.2 that's been out for some time now and is drop dead gorgeous.  I still think Nikon must not realize who their customer base is.  A LOT of wedding photographers and photo-journalists shoot Nikon and the 85 prime is a studio lens.  Where's the 35 1.2?

A LOT? My observation is, every dozen wedding photogs, there might be one Nikon guy...
 
Anyway, Nikon is sure coming out with some awesome lenses lately. I got my 24/1.4 lately and it is drop dead amazing. I'm probably going ot pre-order the new 85... unless someone convinces me to wait for the new Sigma 85 to come out and show me convincing reviews that it is better.

 

[rhythmdevils]

Quote:

A LOT? My observation is, every dozen wedding photogs, there might be one Nikon guy...

 
Well I don't really know I don't pay much attention to people's equipment.  But if that's true, then it's pretty weird.  I can't see why a wedding photographer would want a 5dmkii/Canon over a D700/Nikon. 
 
But regardless I don't get why they prioritized a 24 and 85 over the 35.  But it's good they're making some kickass lenses!  The more the merrier!
 
And continuous video is sweet too!  I am guessing that Nikon's next pro camera will really perfect DSLR video.  I bet they're just testing that tech in their consumer cameras

 

[rhythmdevils]

Do you guys think a subwoofer could damage my camera equipment?  I just got a car and the previous owner put a sub in the back, which is where I put all my equipment when I travel.  Last time I unplugged it for the trip cause I was worried about it.  Seems like those low frequencies could move things around a bit....
 
I'm also wondering about having gear in a rolling bag- seems like all the bumps and vibrations wouldn't be good for gear either. 

 

[bigshot]

Good cameras are designed to take abuse and rough treatment. The things you are worried about aren't even on the scale.

 

[Teraflame]

I went on a trip to china recently. I'd greatly appreciate it if you guys commented on my photos.
 
http://www.flickr.com/photos/teraflame/sets/72157624749356297/detail/

 

[rhythmdevils]

Holy smokes.  Either this is a scam, or someone got a D3X for 900 dollars. 
 
http://cgi.ebay.com/Nikon-DSLR-D3X-Body-Kit-Bat-Gift-2YrsWty-D3-X-05-NEW-/200515682494?pt=Digital_Cameras&hash=item2eafaa80be

 

[bigshot]

Would you bank wire a grand to someone in China? I sure wouldn't.

 

[rhythmdevils]

I might if there was a chance I'd get a brand new D3X for 950

 

[bigshot]

I guess that's why the scammers can keep on doing this.

 

[mierenneuker]

 
Nice, but overpriced.

 

[rhythmdevils]

I'm not sure it's that overpriced.  It's got a lot of cool features.  You practically don't have to do anything.  It has high iso, noise reduction, smile detection, red eye removal, vibration reduction, etc etc  
 
And they finally are coming out with a super fast 35mm prime!  I hope it's not too expensive.  The 50mm 1.4 is around 350, but I don't imagine this will be in that ballpark because that's what the 35 f2 costs.  Would be nice though.  It couldn't cost as much as Canon's 1.2.  
 
Also the new SB700 looks cool.  And I just bought an SB800 a week ago!  I probably still would though, because my radiopoppers don't work with the SB900 and likely won't with the SB700 either.  I'm curious what the deal is, if it's just a smaller SB900 or what.  Looks like it has some nice buttons on the back like a light modifying switch.  

 

[l1f35ux]

If anyone is interested in Nikon 70-200 VR I please PM me.
 
Thanks,

 

[The Uam]

Hey guys, need a quick answer.
So I bought a new camera from a buddy (friend of a friend) that was selling his DSLR. The only reason I bought it was because I'm taking a photography class and it requires a DSLR (which my Canon S90 is not). So I bought his camera with two lenses for $500 Canadian.
It is a Nikon D70S with two Sigma Lenses (both in great condition).
One is a 24-70mm F2.8 DG Macro
And the other is a 50-150mm F2.8 APO EX DC
I'm just wondering If I got it for a good deal or not. If not, what should it be priced at?
Any answers are greatly appreciated!!!

 

[ccbass]

Quote:

Hey guys, need a quick answer.
So I bought a new camera from a buddy (friend of a friend) that was selling his DSLR. The only reason I bought it was because I'm taking a photography class and it requires a DSLR (which my Canon S90 is not). So I bought his camera with two lenses for $500 Canadian.
It is a Nikon D70S with two Sigma Lenses (both in great condition).
One is a 24-70mm F2.8 DG Macro
And the other is a 50-150mm F2.8 APO EX DC
I'm just wondering If I got it for a good deal or not. If not, what should it be priced at?
Any answers are greatly appreciated!!!

 
I'd say you got a good deal, the value of that stuff is probably around $800 or more?