dj_mocok
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Dec 26, 2003
- Posts
- 5,635
- Likes
- 15
I'm starting to fall in love with my 50mm 1.4 MF again after seeing how beautiful it can take picture especially around f/2.8 - f/4 range.
Originally Posted by jterp7 /img/forum/go_quote.gif hah i have the ever popular 18-200VR, but have also switched back to my 50mm 1.4 due to its clearly superior sharpness from f/2.2 and up |
Originally Posted by Towert7 /img/forum/go_quote.gif 2 Years is a very long time (2-3 generations)....... but like the old proverb says: "Only time will tell". |
Originally Posted by agentsim /img/forum/go_quote.gif I think it will be easier to tell once Canon announce their 5d successor. Canon are usually the first to either new tech or lower price points. |
Originally Posted by fureshi /img/forum/go_quote.gif While I agree that Nikon will eventually switch budget DSLRs to FF, I don't think it'll happen in 2 years. The APS sized sensors are doing fine and from what I understand, they haven't hit their limit. I think Thom Hogan said that the theoretical limit for APS sensors is about 16mp. Besides, the DX sensors are doing a good job and cheaper for the beginner and enthusiast photographer and there is a great line of lenses to support those cameras. Look at the D300. I'm still drooling over that camera and it has a 12mp APS sensor that has amazingly low noise in high ISO. I don't think the DX market is one that Nikon or Canon will not give up all that quickly especially when it's a cost advantage to the consumer. |
Originally Posted by Towert7 /img/forum/go_quote.gif For sure. I was so sad when they didn't release their new 5D last month. I sometimes wonder if they are waiting for nikon to announce a D300 type Full Frame, only to release their new one to steal some of the spot light. |
Originally Posted by agentsim /img/forum/go_quote.gif Don't wanna sound like a Canon fan (I'm a Leica person!), but they do have a history of making what seemed like impossible price points reality. For instance, the 300D was the first $1000 DSLR. Even the 5D at the original price was considered impressive when it came out. Now, the 40D at $1300 for a somewhat sealed, 10mp, 6fps body... pretty impressive. I doubt they'll get the 7D down to D300 levels, but pretty close, within $200 would be my guess. |
Originally Posted by skyline889 /img/forum/go_quote.gif I got to test out the new D300 with an 18-200VR the other day and while it was indeed amazing, the blazing speed in particular is just crazy, it's way more camera than I'll ever need. |
Originally Posted by dj_mocok /img/forum/go_quote.gif Nah, 7D will never cost the same as D300. This is where Nikon is stealing the show - managed to put so much of a camera in D300 with that low price. |
Originally Posted by agentsim /img/forum/go_quote.gif I doubt they'll get the 7D down to D300 levels, but pretty close, within $200 would be my guess. |
Originally Posted by fureshi /img/forum/go_quote.gif i would happy if the speculated D90 had the D300 12mp sensor in the D80/D50 sized body. the D300 is probably too much camera for me also, not to mention too expensive for my current budget. |
Originally Posted by kugino /img/forum/go_quote.gif i've been thinking the same thing...but all the rave reviews of the d300 has peaked my interest (and scared my wallet). my d70 is feeling its age. but that might mean i would have to sell some audio gear to finance the d300 (my wife doesn't let me buy anything without selling something else)... |