Mrvile
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2006
- Posts
- 3,391
- Likes
- 13
Quote:
I owned the Tokina 12-24 for Canon for a while. It is a very nice lens...it's sharp, consistant, fast f/4 aperture, and it's distortion is reasonable. For UWA lenses, you're always going to have some level of barrel distortion, and the Tokina's isn't any worse than the Nikon 12-24, Canon 10-22, or Sigma 10-20. I wouldn't worry too much about the distortion.
In the end I traded the Tokina 12-24 for a Sigma 10-20 because 10mm is actually considerably wider than 12mm. Just something to keep in mind.
Originally Posted by skyline889 /img/forum/go_quote.gif What do you Nikon experts think of the 12-24 Tokina? I've been looking through my old shots and most of them were shot at wide angle, so I don't think I would make proper use of the 18-200 range of the 18-200vr. Any troubles with the lens? Any good places to buy it new or used? Thanks for the help! |
I owned the Tokina 12-24 for Canon for a while. It is a very nice lens...it's sharp, consistant, fast f/4 aperture, and it's distortion is reasonable. For UWA lenses, you're always going to have some level of barrel distortion, and the Tokina's isn't any worse than the Nikon 12-24, Canon 10-22, or Sigma 10-20. I wouldn't worry too much about the distortion.
In the end I traded the Tokina 12-24 for a Sigma 10-20 because 10mm is actually considerably wider than 12mm. Just something to keep in mind.