thisbenjamin
500+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Aug 27, 2007
- Posts
- 533
- Likes
- 11
.
Last edited:
Originally Posted by tonycheung /img/forum/go_quote.gif ... - I have several case of the USB signal lost problem, especially for 24bit/96K tracks. During the playback, the signal lost, and something like pink noise from the output. ![]() |
Originally Posted by danne /img/forum/go_quote.gif I thought the built in amp sounded abit thin when I tried it out at our mini meet here in Stockholm. The details was there, the soundstage was there, but it just feelt abit thin. (Using the HD800). The DAC seemed very nice but I dont know if I would settle for the built in amp alone. |
Originally Posted by Jeremy /img/forum/go_quote.gif Maybe my ears have adjusted to it, but I don't find the built-in amp thin at all on the DA11. I find it remarkably detailed and musical. I was concerned about finding it thin ... until I used it for a few hours. Having said that, I have tried my DA11 with the DNA Sonett (tube amp) for several hours on more than one occasion. It is an extremely seductive combination. The DNA Sonett is a stunning amp in this old timer's humble opinion and I may have to let the moths out of my wallet yet again.. |
Originally Posted by danne /img/forum/go_quote.gif Agreed with the Sonett, it was my fav amp with the HD 800 at the meet. But dont you think going from the Sonett back to the built in amp makes it feel thin? |
Originally Posted by thisbenjamin /img/forum/go_quote.gif neutral and tube don't belong in the same sentence ![]() |
Originally Posted by thisbenjamin /img/forum/go_quote.gif whats the point of using tubes if you have a next to no distortion, as you say in the parts per million? What benefit in that case does it have over a quality solid state design? |