Quote:
Originally Posted by haloxt /img/forum/go_quote.gif
jawang, the problem is you don't read right. It's pointless for me to try to discuss with someone with as distorted reading skills as yours. The only question I find remotely worth answering is when you quote me out of context about what audio-gd does before sending out their goods. 1. Audio-gd said themselves it is for quality control purposes, and 2. it has nothing to do with what I've remarked about burn-in on this thread.
|
I guess it's pretty easy for you simply say I "don't read." I mean, it saves you the effort of putting together an argument right? It's pretty arrogant to insist that you're right about something and then refuse to back up your argument because its "not worth your time" (as you said earlier). If you are going to be highly opinionated about a topic, you should be willing to debate it openly.
As for your "1." and "2." comments, I pointed out technicalities in your arguments for a reason. If you tell me that placebo is an illegitimate point because science doesn't fully understand it, then how are your points legitimate? (which also have plenty of of technicalities, like the ones I quoted). Can you verify what you heard/read from audio-gd? Do you work for audio-gd? Where did you get your other information?
Also, how do your comments about manufactor burn-in have "nothing to do" with your comments about burn-in? That statement is such a blatant lie I can't even respond to it
Oh, but wait, nothing that I said applies right? Because I am unable to read. You're also completely free to say anything you want, because you made this blanket statement which you can always fall back on.
Quote:
jawang, I said my observations are just observations. And my theories are just theories. And I really am not pushing anything I've said about burn-in as objective facts, though hard to believe if you don't actually read my posts. |
Clearly, I'm just misreading your posts. You are just telling me observations. You aren't pushing any opinions, nor are you directly telling me that I'm wrong (even though you literally said these words. obviously, I must've misread).