The iMod Replacement: Build your own Portable DAC for optical capable DAPs & PCDP
Jan 3, 2009 at 7:13 PM Thread Starter Post #1 of 35

EFN

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Aug 14, 2006
Posts
3,034
Likes
21
First thing first, there's not many Head-Fier out there use portable DAP with optical in capability. Largely because optical-in capable DAPs are limited to two models, the iRiver H120/H140 and Edirol R-09HR. And there's a few PCDP that supports them but PCDP is becoming a very niche segment as well.

After dwelling with modded iPods (iMod, GMOD & DIYiPods) for two years, I decided to tread the road less travelled and hence find myself in the transportable rig realm in search of "higher fidelity" out of a portable rig.

Why was this necessary? To migrate from the iMod rig to an even bulkier setup? well here's why:

- If I am going to lug around a three bricks setup of iMod + V-Caps Dock + Amp, might as well lug around a fully functional DAC yes?
- I am 100% running portable battery operated rig and does not have a plan for a home setup. So the one and only rig that I have must be the very best I can find and yet maintain portability
- Most importantly, the DAP + Optical + DAC + Amp has been proven to be superior to any modded iPod setups. This I will explain in details below

What are the options:
- Get yourself an iRiver H1XX series. They popped up on eBay regularly and I have seen even up to four instances within a week. But they are NOT cheap; the price is well above any used 5G iPods. I paid as high as $200 for a used H120. To date I have owned two H120 (one sold already) and two H140 (both fried and one already sold). So I am left with one H120 which is in pristine condition (and hopefully I will remember the bitter lesson not to plug in an 18V power adapter to it like I did with my H140)

- Get your optical cables here. These folks make custom ordered optical cable.

- Buy a portable amp of your choice; this should not be a problem at all because there are tons of choices out there. But it is a good idea to grab the slimmest available like the RSA P-51 Mustang, Xin SuperMini-IV or the Pico...up to you. My first choice now is a MiniBox-E+

- Now get your DAC. The problem is, there's not many portable battery operated DAC available today. The most popular choice was the HeadRoom MicroDAC 2006 and iBasso/MAD D1 (both no longer in production). Most DACs nowadays sport USB input and you're lucky if they have optical in. Even if they do, most likely they will operate on wall wart and no battery option

After doing some intensive searching, there's still hope. This is when I come across these three DACs:

HifiDIY.net Mini1793 SPDIF DAC Board -PCM1793+DIR9001 (Aluminum Box)
mini1793_box1.jpg


HifiDIY.net Mini SPDIF DAC TDA1543 DIR9001 NOS (Aluminum box)
dac1543_box1.jpg


SuperPro 24-bit USB/Coax/Optical DAC (No Longer in eBay active list but available through ALO as well)
superpro_dac1.jpg


But the problem is they are all NON Battery operated and only offer RCA output which is not suitable for a portable rig (but may be a good companion to Lisa III amp)

So, if you want to use them on the move, get this 12V battery pack:
SUPER 12V RECHARGEABLE LITHIUM BATTERY FOR CCTV CAMERA
9683_1.JPG

* Priced at US $17.99, it's a steal because this battery has been proven to power my PCM1793 DAC for more than 12 hours continuously. The battery is rated at 1800 mAH with three cells of Li-Ion bars. Buy from he same dealer as an earlier model I purchased somewhere else was not performing as expected
* The battery comes together with a short patch cable which will work perfectly with the DACs DC in

So there you have a DAC solution for less than $200. BUT the gripe for this setup is that you will have to deal with four bricks now (DAP+DAC+Batt pack+Amp) so it is not going to be a light transportable rig at all. But hey nowadays I see tons of people lugging around over 2KG of DSLR, so why not an audio rig?
ph34r.gif
biggrin.gif


[size=small]Going to the dark side...[/size]

But determined to carry only 3 bricks, and against all hope - I actually expect my transportable to be POCKETABLE
ph34r.gif
- So I DIYed the DAC and Battery Pack into a singular unit which will be half the thickness of both combined.

I purchased two DAC kit (Mini1793-SPDIF-DAC-Board-PCM1793-DIR9001) from the eBay seller chenxueqian_cn2 (Clark). He's a jolly guy who responded fast to all of my queries and accommodate my requests right on the dot. I requested that he remove the Coaxial Jack, Selector Switch and RCA Jacks from the 2nd board because I don't need them.

Next, I purchased a Hammond aluminum box which is long enough to accommodate both the battery and DAC board. The model is 1455J1601 purchased from mouser.com

I don't want to elaborate too much on the DIY details but the finished product looked like this:

DACInternalPIC1.png

The DAC board with some modifications of my own. The three cells 12 battery is now hard wired directly to the board and have recharging capability via a DC in jack at the back

DACFront1.png


DACRear1.png


AllThreePic1.png

Ready for action!

The mod include:
- OPA2134PA swapped out for an AD8620
- Hard wired the Analogue out using 0.6mm Pure Solid Core 5N Silver wire
- Japanese 3.5mm Female Jack
- Relocated leds

[size=small]Now on to the sound[/size]

As I mentioned earlier, I have extensive experience with iMod and DIYiPod setups. To date I have used 4G RWA iMod, 5 & 5.5G iMods, 5.5G DIYiPods, 5G GMOD and an iPod Mini DIYmod. All using the same concept of removing and bypassing the crappy internal caps for higher grade make. There's no need for me to elaborate on iMod/DIYiPod SQ, it has been discussed to death all over the forum and the majority agreed that they claim the crown for DAP+Amp category.

So how does this DAP+Optical+DAC+Amp fares against an iMod/DIYiPod rig? I have very limited experience with external DACs but over a year ago I was fortunate enough to listen to a Benchmark DAC1 at a local Head-Fier meet. It dawned to me that there's much that I am missing with my iMod rig which I dearly loved at that time. DAC1 was a revelation, the sound was utterly clean and pristine. Since then I was determined that I must have that sort of sound on my portable rig and so began the long staggered journey to the path less travelled.

Companion Gears:
* iRiver iHP-120 Optical Out (Rockboxed)
* I use FLAC V3 exclusively on my iRiver DAP
* Pure 5N Solid Core Silver + Switchcraft Plugs IC in three braid configuration IC used to patch the DAC > AMP
* Glass Toslink IC from Bengal LLC
* Highly modified/silver recabled Etymotic ER-4S with 98 oHM impedance
* Three Stones MiniBox-E+ head amp with 6db Bass Boost active

The Details:

- Large and non-constricted sound. In contrast this is very similar to an iMod + Mundorf ZN 4.7 uF rig. The differences are small but the DAC tend to sound more like a full blown CD deck that I used to listen to with my ER-4S

- Much refined dynamics and nuances. With the iMod + V-Caps, it is already an improvement, it was easy to discern delicate nuances but due to the limitation of the internal Wolfson DAC, some delicate passages may become euphonic sounding and congested. Not with this DAC, it is now possible to sustain steady dynamics at complex passages as can be found in most multi instruments tracks

- Full bodied bass response. When you are using a cold sounding IEM like the ER-4S, you gonna need all the bass masses you can get. No shortage of bass response here. Audibly, my amp was able to make use of the improved bass response for a highly charged output. Overall improvement with visceral impact and slam with deep extension which I thought only an iMod can offer previously. Bass decay and reverb was picked up by the amp easily and have brought my ER-4S into becoming a bass monster
tongue.gif
(6db bass boost active on the amp). Well this does not necessarily mean that my rig is bass heavy now, I am merely getting back that delicate balance that was missing from the ER-4S

- Deep, intimate mids - yet still very transparent and realistic. Notably the mids are a bit warmer now (effects of AD8620 + MiniBox 6db bass boost) but I would say that the mids now closely resembles Westone signature - something of a crossover between Ety and Westone, interesting yes? I am heavily into Nick Cave, Diana Krall and Morrissey where vocals are the main attraction; the DAC was able to project a very clear yet warm tube-like output which will not fail to impress even the most picky audiophile - this I am very certain of because I find myself rotating the songs over and over again like never before. Most importantly, the DAC does not emphasize on the vocals to generate "Ssss" sibilance unlike iMod 5G. It is still focused yet sibilance has been suppressed commendably. With ER-4S, vocal sibilance can be a real killer and I was relieved that the problem now no longer a threat for marathon listening.

- Treble. Honestly, I do not need any improvement beyond what an ER-4S can offer. But it was a blessing to hear that treble and treble extension is very silky smooth with this DAC. There's significantly less treble sheen and spiky-ness to the sound compared to an iMod rig. This means it is a lot more forgiving and yet extended treble can still be enjoyed to the fullest extent. The decays are more realistic and engaging, one of the most difficult part to accomplish on most rig. Traditionally the ER-4S will have short and curt treble decays, now it is closer to Grado/Alessandro decay style and this resulted in a lush presentation - depending on the listener, this could be a love/hate affair

Soundstage:
There's not much can be said about soundstage on an IEM. The best I can hope for is a non congested presentation with 360 degree imaging. I recall iMod 5G + Mundorf ZN 4.7uF + SuperMicro-IV being the largest sounding soundstage I have ever heard on a portable IEM setup. This DAC combo fall short by a hair in comparison. Perhaps if I switch back to OPA2134PA I can improve the soundstage but I am beginning to like AD8620 tubey output very much

Separation/Details:
This DAC is a clear champ in instrument separation and miniscule details, even more that an iMod can hope to offer. The differences are in very well placed and distinctive separation between instruments and it was easy to follow a bass line or violin passages. They are spaced realistically with very little hint of intermingling which can mask the intended output. Detail freaks will find joy in hearing audible and distinctive projection of trivial sound such as Diana Krall inhale/exhale breath between words, stringed instruments reverb, guitar pre/post effects etc. But this also can be a curse on poorly recorded and mastered songs as I am getting floor noises as well as part of the package. The noises are not from the rig but from the recordings itself

Transparency/Imaging:
This is never a problem with ER-4S and I would expect that pairing it with the DAC rig can only project what is already there. Notably, my current DAC rig is geared for a tube like presentation and at the same time I would want them to remain as transparent as possible - that's asking a lot actually and yet the DAC rig delivers. To me, a good rig must excel in imaging and focus - music is all about immersing the listener into the songs realm and I am getting it from the rig - in short I would expect my brains to be melted with intense musical attack - but mind, they have to be non fatiguing at the same time

Sound summary:
The best thing that I like about this DAC setup is the ability to project a very organic analogue sound. This is very clearly evident as I switch between my DELL laptop and the DAC. The laptop output was very digital sounding even if it is good at the same time. I would say that the DAC offers very modest and realistic output, there wasn't a hint of aggressiveness and exaggerated presentation. If my memory serves me well, I recall Benchmark DAC1 being a bit too analytical and surgical like - if you want to analyze the music that's fine - but it may be too clean for musical purposes. This DAC isn't high end, but who cares if the sound fits the bill and you get musical enjoyment that you can carry all over the place?. The DAC also project a very clean background and as silent as an iMod - no more no less.

There's nothing that I can really complain about this setup sound wise. This is definitely a next step attainable in transportable rig and so I am still aligning myself with the whole experience. It is no longer as convenient as before.

The not so good side:
- For some reason, the DAC will emit annoying noises if the optical link is severed. But once there's an optical signal passed through, it will be as silent as night. I am not sure if this is a "feature" of this DAC or it may be that I have broken something during the DIY transplant
- The DAC itself is not small and practical anymore with the addition of the 3 cells batteries. The overall dimension is very similar to a Lisa III amp now. But hey, nothing is perfect
 
Jan 14, 2009 at 1:38 AM Post #4 of 35
Quote:

Originally Posted by itobito /img/forum/go_quote.gif
I wait just Battery, and after I will built it together.

sound from dac is realy fantastic powerfull, clean, strong.

DSC02745.jpg


Thanks EFN



Hey. Sweet! Wait until the burn in reached 200 hours and it will sound even better. There's no less than 2 caps that need burn in there.

Enjoy
smily_headphones1.gif
 
Jan 14, 2009 at 3:15 AM Post #5 of 35
Looking at all the time work and money in that project ...could you not make something much more elegant (all be it more expensive) by using the new Sony Micro Notebook and a Pico with a built in DAC? Just one USB connection and you are set. With no mechanical hard drive (you can order the P-9 with a 64 to 128 GB SSD) this "sub-Netbook" should be ideal for audio also.

I'm tempted to have a leather worker modify the P-9's carrying case to accept a "Pico Pocket". And then add a pair of Audio-Technica ATH-ESW10JPN Black Cherry Wood Headphones and you will be the at the pinnacle of headfi fashion, not to mention the great sound.

To me, this represents not only the pinnacle of portable hi-fi, but a damn nice Netbook for video, wi-fi, and even a built in GPS. Although it wont fit in your pocket, I'm very tempted to build this. And this so so much nicer then any of the home-brew solutions I've seen to optical or USB out in a small form factor. I'm really tempted to show my wife this and can imagine it with a matching colored Pico with gold knob and the cherry wood Audiotechnica's.

laptop_wideweb__470x313,0.jpg
f_audiotechnica_athesw10jpn
IMG_0052.jpg
 
Jan 14, 2009 at 3:39 AM Post #6 of 35
Lornecherry:
Yep, that's another evil idea floating in my mind. Just that my wallet have died recently (R.I.P) and I am in hibernation now until new supplies of $$ materializes.

Seriously, I do hope you can build that rig because the biggest obstacle that I see is $$$. And oh that slim Sony UMPC is SEXXY
 
Jan 14, 2009 at 3:55 AM Post #7 of 35
Quote:

Originally Posted by Lornecherry /img/forum/go_quote.gif
Looking at all the time work and money in that project ...could you not make something much more elegant (all be it more expensive) by using the new Sony Micro Notebook and a Pico with a built in DAC? Just one USB connection and you are set. With no mechanical hard drive (you can order the P-9 with a 64 to 128 GB SSD) this "sub-Netbook" should be ideal for audio also.

I'm tempted to have a leather worker modify the P-9's carrying case to accept a "Pico Pocket". And then add a pair of Audio-Technica ATH-ESW10JPN Black Cherry Wood Headphones and you will be the at the pinnacle of headfi fashion, not to mention the great sound.

To me, this represents not only the pinnacle of portable hi-fi, but a damn nice Netbook for video, wi-fi, and even a built in GPS. Although it wont fit in your pocket, I'm very tempted to build this. And this so so much nicer then any of the home-brew solutions I've seen to optical or USB out in a small form factor. I'm really tempted to show my wife this and can imagine it with a matching colored Pico with gold knob and the cherry wood Audiotechnica's.

laptop_wideweb__470x313,0.jpg
f_audiotechnica_athesw10jpn
IMG_0052.jpg



unfortunately at 1500 bucks for the base model I think it may be a very pricey netbook
smily_headphones1.gif
 
Jan 14, 2009 at 5:12 AM Post #8 of 35
hockey213 ...base model is $899 with HDD, or $1199 with 64 SSD, not bad considering a good netbook is around $500 anyway ...and this has so much more 'wow' factor.

EFN ...my wallet aches, not sure when I can pull the trigger (the Netbooks not available in Canada yet anyway) ... and I have HD800's also on my list. The only reason I might get away with this is the very high WAF factor ... the concept looks very promising on paper with respect to SQ, given the Pico ATH-10 reported synergy.

What I am wondering, if the Pico could be re-cased into a low flat, flat form factor that is then velcroed right under the Sony, kind'a like those extended battery packs. (I'm sure Justin could do it if I couldn't.) This mod would make the system small enough to slip into a large coat or suit inside pocket and 'hide' the high end audio for every-day use. And when you're tired of tunes, just run an HD movie on the Sony ...or read headfi.

G-d damn ...I need a life.
beyersmile.png
 
Jan 14, 2009 at 5:20 AM Post #9 of 35
EFN ..sorry for hijacking the thread to another portable solution ...perhaps others could chime in with their proposed solutions, thus building this thread into a useful resource for portable high end other than the iMod.

Another temptress is a much small case for the Wadia iTransport, although you are still into a high-bulk factor/ugly recase and battery issues, not to mention jitter problems.

If Wadia ever built a portable iTransport with a built in DAC and battery power, they'd really corner the market. Seeing the size of the iTransport board, it is certainly possible.
 
Jan 14, 2009 at 5:52 AM Post #10 of 35
You know that the Gigabeat F and X expose the I2S signal at the dock connector, right?
 
Jan 14, 2009 at 6:23 AM Post #11 of 35
EFN,

Could you explain how going from a DAP => DAC (like Ibasso D1/10) via optical => amp via mini-mini works (it is a mini-mini right)?

My understanding is that with ipod using a true line-out, the internal amp within the ipod is bypassed and goes directly to the amp.

I'm curious as to how the the whole process works with your setup. From my limited understanding, the DAP feeds the DAC which converts the audio, then goes through the amplifier which modifies the sound, which is then connected to the headphone. What is so good about optical line in/out, as compared to headphone or line-out?

Also, when D10 comes out, I know it can be either used as a DAC only, or DAC/amp combo. How will that work if I am to use the iriver h120 => D10 and use it both as a DAC and an amp (is it even possible)?

Thanks
 
Jan 14, 2009 at 6:50 AM Post #12 of 35
Lornecherry:
Not a problem at all. We can use this thread to discuss about transportable rig to our heart contents. keep em coming.

ericj:
Thanks for sharing this info. So the Gigabeat need a special dock to tap the I2S into usable signal?

younglee200:
The concept is simple.

iMod:
Wolfson DAC -> Analogue Out -> Internal Amp bypassed-> Internal Caps removed/bypassed -> Raw Analogue signal goes through exotic caps -> Interconnect -> Amp Line In -> Amp -> Headphone


Player+Optical+DAC+Amp:
Internal DAC bypassed -> Digital Signal goes out through Optical SPDIF -> External DAC receives the signal and perform Digital to Analogue conversion -> Preamp (if available) -> Analogue Signal Out -> Goes through interconnect -> Amp Line In -> amp -> Headphone

The miniscule Woflson DAC has limitations that does not present in external DAC (depending on what DAC). So bypassing the internal DAC gives more room to explore higher possibilities in attaining better SQ
 
Jan 14, 2009 at 7:18 AM Post #13 of 35
So the only difference between the imod + amp and the iriver => DAC => amp is that the DAC is better. The cost should be around the same, considering getting a DAC probably costs as much as getting an imod. The downside would be the extra bulk...

So using a DAC/amp together in 1 unit(like in the ibasso D10) would work the same way, I assume? Would that be just like using an imod with an amp via line-out?
 
Jan 14, 2009 at 7:48 AM Post #14 of 35
Quote:

Originally Posted by younglee200 /img/forum/go_quote.gif
So the only difference between the imod + amp and the iriver => DAC => amp is that the DAC is better. The cost should be around the same, considering getting a DAC probably costs as much as getting an imod. The downside would be the extra bulk...

So using a DAC/amp together in 1 unit(like in the ibasso D10) would work the same way, I assume? Would that be just like using an imod with an amp via line-out?



Yes. The DAC makes the difference.

If you are careful enough, the cost of building an iRiver H120+DAC+ Amp can be cheaper (a lot cheaper) to building an iMod+ALO Caps+Amp rig - taking into account ALO premium prices.

Yes, the D10 works the same as well because you will still be sending digital out instead of analogue. The only difference is, the amp section is integrated together and this makes room for a very slim profile. I personally prefer non integrated solution at the expense of size. IMO, a dedicated DAC or amp should have upper hand in most situation.
 
Jan 14, 2009 at 3:20 PM Post #15 of 35
Quote:

Originally Posted by EFN /img/forum/go_quote.gif
Thanks for sharing this info. So the Gigabeat need a special dock to tap the I2S into usable signal?


Modified dock or cable. It's not the same connector as an ipod but it's a connector you can buy.

You could run I2S directly into a DAC that accepts I2S if you used a not-too-long cable, or convert the I2S signal into SPDIF.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top