maverickronin
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Apr 5, 2010
- Posts
- 7,390
- Likes
- 421
I don't really know what the chances are but I shouldn't really spend the money on customs as long as there's another wallet destroying variable in play...
I don't really know what the chances are but I shouldn't really spend the money on customs as long as there's another wallet destroying variable in play...
I agree. I wouldn't risk it either. Although I've already lost 20 lbs lol.
The SM3 has rolled off treble while the EX1000 has very airy and extended treble. Completely different beasts. Also the SM3 sound stage is small in comparison.
Quote:
I've never really seen the point of the expense and effort of customs when technology for universals is improving almost yearly. Diminishing returns seems to kick in too viciously at that end of the scale for me to consider paying for something that has terrible resale value.
Well I figure you never know until you try. I don't doubt the Customs are a significant upgrade over Universals or these companies wouldn't be in business to begin with. I'll be able to determine for myself though once I've received my Custom TF10s and then my Heir 8.A. I don't plan on selling them though.
I can imagine that customs are better than universals, and while I haven't actually got a custom myself I just tend to think that customs came out originally for stage musicians. If they were really better than say, a good full size monitor, wouldn't recording engineers also be getting customs? I understand the attraction of something custom made but if I had a spare 600+ dollars I would for sure be getting some high end full size rather than a custom. Just a personal feeling of mine, since I know a lot of you guys love your customs. XD
The thing with customs and IEMs in general is that you can get a more intimate presentation and more detail. Bass can also go lower than on full size cans. You also have IEMs that give you many full size can qualities such as an expansive sound stage but in a portable package.
I can imagine that customs are better than universals, and while I haven't actually got a custom myself I just tend to think that customs came out originally for stage musicians. If they were really better than say, a good full size monitor, wouldn't recording engineers also be getting customs? I understand the attraction of something custom made but if I had a spare 600+ dollars I would for sure be getting some high end full size rather than a custom. Just a personal feeling of mine, since I know a lot of you guys love your customs. XD
While I don't really go quite as far (that outfit looks a bit mish mash to me to be honest) I actually dress like that sometimes. More, black shorts and leggings than that though.
(Yes I've been told I look ridiculous before.)
Try Fennesz' "Endless Summer" sometime too. It's my favorite. His most recent "Seven Stars" EP is less abstract and quite pleasant as well. I also recommend Tim Hecker for a similar kind of sound, but more focused.
I thought it was the archetypical V-Shape Villain? I had the SuperFi 5 EB's, which were vaudevillian V shaped.
Originally Posted by MuppetFace /img/forum/go_quote.gif
Hmm.
The mids were a bit recessed but nicely separated and pleasant. I was inclined to think of them as "good," though not "great." The highs were "inoffensive" to me, which is to say they didn't bother me more than anything else. Overall the bass was what stood out as the strong suit. Definitely a fun IEM, not a reference.
The SF 5 EBs were designed to be bass monsters, while the SF 5 Pro was intended to have gentler emphasis at the extremes. The TF10 has more in common with the Super.fi 5 Pro, which sounded similar (strong lows and highs, soft middle), but not with as much detail, range and dynamics. (Keep in mind I'm working off a years-old recollection of my SF 5 Pros).
(Yes I've been told I look ridiculous before.)
This is the look I aspire to:
/SNIP
Not quite as practical (disclaimer: not my legs, either), but I can only hope to be this gentlemanly someday.