The Canon Thread
Feb 8, 2009 at 6:02 PM Post #1,516 of 2,718
Quote:

Originally Posted by digitalfrog /img/forum/go_quote.gif
The 16-35 f/2.8 rocks ...

here is one made with that lens a few days ago

3255613698_d45977dc56_o.jpg



Is that the mark 1 or mark 2? I find the 16-35 mark II having the best flare control at the moment in my entire arsenal of L glass (even without the hood, it doesn't flare as badly as the 24-70L)
 
Feb 9, 2009 at 12:00 PM Post #1,519 of 2,718
Quote:

Originally Posted by lyricalmoments /img/forum/go_quote.gif
Anyway, there's a brand new EF 50mm f1.0L up for grabs on Ebay. Probably the last new piece left in the world.


ha! and they're both local sellers to me. It's such a speciality lens. So much $ though.
 
Feb 9, 2009 at 7:09 PM Post #1,520 of 2,718
Quote:

Originally Posted by digitalfrog /img/forum/go_quote.gif
@lyricalmoments, it's a MII


The MII has a lot of improvements over the 1st version, flare resistance is the first thing, followed by better sharpness at f2.8

A lot of my images that has won international awards were shot on the 16-35mm mark 2, this one for instance gotten 2 major awards so far.

SC376.jpg
 
Feb 9, 2009 at 7:59 PM Post #1,521 of 2,718
lyricalmoments, that's a cool photo. Did you fire it with infrared? I don't see wireless radio triggers.

I see another 50mm f/1.0 locally. LOL. Much cheaper than the ones on ebay.
 
Feb 9, 2009 at 9:49 PM Post #1,522 of 2,718
I bought a cheap A590 IS. Pretty weak compared to these, but sufficient for my needs.
 
Feb 9, 2009 at 9:50 PM Post #1,523 of 2,718
Quote:

Originally Posted by Fumoffuru /img/forum/go_quote.gif
I bought a cheap A590 IS. Pretty weak compared to these, but sufficient for my needs.


For some reason the canon P&S's always seemed nice to me.
I'm sure it will serve you well fumoffuru.
 
Feb 10, 2009 at 12:27 AM Post #1,524 of 2,718
Quote:

Originally Posted by lyricalmoments /img/forum/go_quote.gif
The MII has a lot of improvements over the 1st version, flare resistance is the first thing, followed by better sharpness at f2.8

A lot of my images that has won international awards were shot on the 16-35mm mark 2, this one for instance gotten 2 major awards so far.

SC376.jpg



I just realised they are both holding a flash each.
duggehsmile.png
 
Feb 10, 2009 at 7:14 AM Post #1,525 of 2,718
Quote:

Originally Posted by lan /img/forum/go_quote.gif
lyricalmoments, that's a cool photo. Did you fire it with infrared? I don't see wireless radio triggers.

I see another 50mm f/1.0 locally. LOL. Much cheaper than the ones on ebay.



Infrared wouldn't have the range... it's triggered with the Pocket Wizards Plus II, it's coiled around the couples' hands.
biggrin.gif
 
Feb 11, 2009 at 1:28 PM Post #1,527 of 2,718
Quote:

Originally Posted by lyricalmoments /img/forum/go_quote.gif
Infrared wouldn't have the range... it's triggered with the Pocket Wizards Plus II, it's coiled around the couples' hands.
biggrin.gif



Makes total sense. Good job hiding the wizards.
 
Feb 15, 2009 at 3:11 AM Post #1,529 of 2,718
Quote:

Originally Posted by Fumoffuru /img/forum/go_quote.gif
I bought a cheap A590 IS. Pretty weak compared to these, but sufficient for my needs.


You can do quite a bit with the A590 - it has a decent selection of manual settings if you want to get into them and seems to be a good camera from what I've heard (I own an A630). Most of a good photo is the person behind the camera rather than the camera itself.
 
Feb 15, 2009 at 2:50 PM Post #1,530 of 2,718
Quote:

Originally Posted by raptor84 /img/forum/go_quote.gif
Rented the 35L for this weekend.. not quite used to the focal range but its a beaaauty on FF
biggrin.gif



I think I like the 85 1.8 photos better. You have to get SO close with the 35. Renting is a good idea to try out lenses though.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top