testing headphones power handling?
Jul 10, 2012 at 12:28 PM Thread Starter Post #1 of 15

HiFiGuy528

Member of the Trade: Woo Audio
Joined
Mar 5, 2012
Posts
4,115
Likes
1,433
Anyone here knows how to test the power handling of a full size headphones? Pioneer HDJ-2000 claims to handle 2000mW. I wonder if this is true? Also, who makes an amp that outputs that much power? My Musical Fidelity M1 HPA looks to have the most power at 1,100 mW from my understanding.
 
Jul 10, 2012 at 12:42 PM Post #2 of 15
Tube amps can have enough power, and SS amps such as the Beta22 should have enough power as well. Otherwise you can use the speaker tabs on a power amp.

But I general I would strongly advice against testing power handling. The manufacturer has set those limits for a reason, if you go above them there is a good chance you're going to damage the headphones in the process.
 
Jul 10, 2012 at 1:32 PM Post #4 of 15
Quote:
Can't under powering have higher chance of damaging drivers because of clipping? That's my understanding coming from home audio speakers.

 
With headphones and amplifiers that behave well on clipping (i.e. clip reasonably symmetrically, do not swing to the other power rail, and do not oscillate), I would guess "under powering" is more likely to simply sound bad than damage the drivers. If any clipping was dangerous, people listening to modern popular music would have rather short lived headphones and speakers
normal_smile%20.gif

 
Jul 10, 2012 at 1:36 PM Post #5 of 15
Can't under powering have higher chance of damaging drivers because of clipping? That's my understanding coming from home audio speakers.

No. Clipping is still limited in volume, and volume is the main thing that could damage the headphones.
If you're talking about the high frequency content of clipping, then it should really have an effect either since most headphones are bandwidth limited to not far above and below the audible range. That is, the high frequency content will simply be attenuated and not cause any harm.
 
Jul 10, 2012 at 1:40 PM Post #6 of 15
Can't under powering have higher chance of damaging drivers because of clipping? That's my understanding coming from home audio speakers.

Not that it matters, and I am not recommending tube amps (or not), but the JBL White Paper that was the genesis of that warning was authored when bipolar transistor amps were taking over from tubes in the market.

When bipolar transistor output clips the waveforms are destructive to voice coils. Tube and Mosfet outputs tend to be benign in that respect. If there is no voice coil - electrostatic phones - distortion may still be a problem, but not heat buildup as far as I can see.

The high frequency products of distortion are another issue, I agree. One mitigating fact is that higher frequency waveforms have far less energy than low frequency; they tend to create less heat in big voice coils. The bad news, smaller voice coils don't need much heat to fail. Clipping fries the tweeters first in speakers.
 
Jul 10, 2012 at 2:03 PM Post #7 of 15
Quote:
When bipolar transistor output clips the waveforms are destructive to voice coils. Tube and Mosfet outputs tend to be benign in that respect. If there is no voice coil - electrostatic phones - distortion may still be a problem, but not heat buildup as far as I can see.
The high frequency products of distortion are another issue, I agree. One mitigating fact is that higher frequency waveforms have far less energy than low frequency; they tend to create less heat in big voice coils. The bad news, smaller voice coils don't need much heat to fail. Clipping fries the tweeters first in speakers.

 
Fortunately, headphones usually do not have separate tweeters with lower power handling. Also, only poorly designed amplifiers have "destructive" output (oscillation etc.) on clipping.

 
Jul 10, 2012 at 2:15 PM Post #9 of 15
Sorry to have been confusing. The destructive element I was referring to was heat generated by the transducer attempting to reproduce the clipped waveform. Not new frequencies generated by distortion. There was a good bit of apples and oranges back and forth in my badly organized post. Appologies.
 
Jul 10, 2012 at 7:14 PM Post #10 of 15
Sorry to have been confusing. The destructive element I was referring to was heat generated by the transducer attempting to reproduce the clipped waveform. Not new frequencies generated by distortion. There was a good bit of apples and oranges back and forth in my badly organized post. Appologies.


Thank you for the clarification.
 
Jul 10, 2012 at 7:15 PM Post #11 of 15
Sorry to have been confusing. The destructive element I was referring to was heat generated by the transducer attempting to reproduce the clipped waveform. Not new frequencies generated by distortion. There was a good bit of apples and oranges back and forth in my badly organized post. Appologies.


Thank you for the clarification.
 
Jul 11, 2012 at 6:38 AM Post #12 of 15
Quote:
Sorry to have been confusing. The destructive element I was referring to was heat generated by the transducer attempting to reproduce the clipped waveform.

 
Heat is also generated without clipping, though, it is mainly a function of the input power.
 
Jul 11, 2012 at 11:15 AM Post #13 of 15
Heat is also generated without clipping, though, it is mainly a function of the input power.


Will burning in a headphones by playing continuously for more than 8 hrs. at slightly above normal listening level cause heat to build up and damage the voice coil/driver?
 
Aug 2, 2012 at 11:19 PM Post #15 of 15
Quote:
 
Nope.  

As long as you don't exceed their rated power, they will never overheat.

While this is true at normal to slightly above normal lisening levels you can damage the earphones with highly compressed music played back just slightly below rated power.Just like you can't run an engine at full power indefinately without possible damage same applies to earphones & speakers. Some commercial engins can output thier full rated power for long periods but you have to undestand these engines also tend to have lower power for a given displacement than non commercial engines & are running fuels that have some lubricity as well as cooling properties in them so I'm not speaking of these engines.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top