TDA1308 amp circuit
Jul 23, 2012 at 8:08 AM Thread Starter Post #1 of 21

teikjoon

New Head-Fier
Joined
Jul 23, 2012
Posts
8
Likes
0
Hello forum,
 
Was looking around for a low-voltage headamp circuit I could build, which I could power with the USB battery pack I already carry around (an XtremeMac InCharge Portable) when I came across this TDA1308 circuit :
 
 
 
 

 
(original source : http://www.dz3w.com/diycn/music/1119.html)
 
From what I can gather from the Google Transla-tion, this is powered by two 3.6V lithium batteries, but I had a few questions, and was wondering if someone could help with, such as :
 
a) Is JK3 a charging/mains power jack?
b) What is the purpose of the row of capacitors (C2, C3, C4, C5, C6)? I think the translation says it is a "RC damper network", but I'm not sure what it does.
c) Is there a virtual ground circuit? I can't tell... 
confused.gif

 
Thanks in advance for an help 
biggrin.gif

 
Jul 23, 2012 at 8:13 AM Post #2 of 21
Yes, JK3 is the charging jack.
 
There is no virtual ground.
It uses a "Real" ground formed by the split rail battery pack.
One battery for the + rail and one for the - rail.
 
Jul 23, 2012 at 10:39 AM Post #3 of 21
Hello forum,

Was looking around for a low-voltage headamp circuit I could build, which I could power with the USB battery pack I already carry around (an XtremeMac InCharge Portable) when I came across this TDA1308 circuit :


Would it not be easier just to implement the circuit on the datasheet? It is single supply already....
 
Jul 23, 2012 at 8:11 PM Post #7 of 21
Oh, thanks 
biggrin.gif

 
Finally...am assuming R(L) is the gain resistor, and the datasheet has this at 32 ohms...but I am not sure what formula or values to calculate the gain.
 
Looked at Tangent's cmoy tutorial, and I'm not sure if his formula is applicable... 
confused.gif

 
Jul 23, 2012 at 9:28 PM Post #8 of 21
No, RL is the load, or to put it another way, the headphones.
 
32 ohms is often used as a typical value for headphone impedance.
 
The gain is set by the 3k9 resistors (in the datasheet) (there being 2 of these connected to each input, one connected to the source, and one to the output), giving -3900/3900 or -1 (the amplifier is inverting). The modern trend is to make audio amplifiers preserve the signal phase as is the practice in mixers (non-inverting). See e.g. here:- http://www.radio-electronics.com/info/circuits/opamp_basics/operational-amplifier-gain.php
 

 
Jul 24, 2012 at 12:19 AM Post #9 of 21
Oh...alright...
 
So I will need to change the ratio of R4:R3 (and R6:R5) to determine the gain?
 
Therefore to get gain of 10, I will need R4 = 39K ohm and R3 = 3.9K ohm...
 
Does it matter what values I use for these resistors, or merely their ratio? I think the cmoy uses 10K ohm / 1K ohm to achieve gain of 11.
 
Thanks for everyone's help so far 
biggrin.gif

 
 
Quote:
No, RL is the load, or to put it another way, the headphones.
 
32 ohms is often used as a typical value for headphone impedance.
 
The gain is set by the 3k9 resistors (in the datasheet) (there being 2 of these connected to each input, one connected to the source, and one to the output), giving -3900/3900 or -1 (the amplifier is inverting). The modern trend is to make audio amplifiers preserve the signal phase as is the practice in mixers (non-inverting). See e.g. here:- http://www.radio-electronics.com/info/circuits/opamp_basics/operational-amplifier-gain.php
 

 
Jul 24, 2012 at 7:53 AM Post #10 of 21
Why do you need such a high gain?
Usually 5 or less is good enough...
 
Quote:
Oh...alright...
 
So I will need to change the ratio of R4:R3 (and R6:R5) to determine the gain?
 
Therefore to get gain of 10, I will need R4 = 39K ohm and R3 = 3.9K ohm...
 
Does it matter what values I use for these resistors, or merely their ratio? I think the cmoy uses 10K ohm / 1K ohm to achieve gain of 11.
 
Thanks for everyone's help so far 
biggrin.gif

 
 

 
Jul 24, 2012 at 8:54 PM Post #11 of 21
Hrmn...perhaps I worded it poorly, but I was just using those value to verify the formula.
 
Like you say, a gain of 5 would probably be best..so R4 = 19.5K and R3 = 3.9K?
 
Also..does it matter what the values of R4 and R3 are, or can I change their values as long as their ratio R4:R3 are consistent (i.e. 19.5K/3.9K = gain of 5, 5K/1K = gain of 5).
 
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Avro_Arrow /img/forum/go_quote.gif
 
Why do you need such a high gain?
Usually 5 or less is good enough...

 
Jul 24, 2012 at 9:05 PM Post #12 of 21
You are correct, the ratio determines the gain.
Higher values of R use less current, but cause more noise.
Lower values of R use up more of your current, but cause
less noise. Values of 1K and 5K would be reasonable values.
Maybe even as low as 500 and 2k5 (2k5 means the same as 2.5k).
 
Jul 24, 2012 at 9:40 PM Post #13 of 21
Cool thanks, I'll get this breadboarded and try it out 
L3000.gif

Quote:
You are correct, the ratio determines the gain.
Higher values of R use less current, but cause more noise.
Lower values of R use up more of your current, but cause
less noise. Values of 1K and 5K would be reasonable values.
Maybe even as low as 500 and 2k5 (2k5 means the same as 2.5k).

 
Mar 31, 2013 at 7:38 AM Post #14 of 21
teikjoon - how did you go with this project?
 
I've built a TDA1308 amp based on the circuit proposed in the datasheet, sounds great with my KRK KNS8400 phones @ 32 ohms impedance, however it certainly doesn't have the juice to power my 600 ohm Beyer DT880s.  Did you try playing around with the gain resistors?
 
Any suggestions as to how I can customise the gain resistors for DT800 (600 ohm)?
 
Apr 1, 2013 at 10:18 AM Post #15 of 21
Try R3/R5 = 1k and R4/R6 = 5k
How much supply voltage are you using?
You may need to increase the supply voltage as well.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top