Squeezebox vs Competition? (Sonos, Roku, Olive)
Mar 3, 2006 at 11:26 PM Thread Starter Post #1 of 48

insomniac

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
May 12, 2003
Posts
2,997
Likes
23
It seems like Slim Devices' Squeezebox is generating a lot of discussion here lately and I have to admit that I'm very intrigued myself. Might just have to pick one up.

But what separates it from many of its direct and indirect competitors? The ones that come to my mind first include:
- Sonos
- Roku
- Olive
- even Apple's Airport Express
I'm sure there are several others I'm forgetting or just don't know about. I know most of these companies make products that are slightly to very different from Squeezebox, but they all seem to accomplish similar goals.

Is it the versatility of the Slim Server software? Or is it something hardware related?
 
Mar 3, 2006 at 11:37 PM Post #2 of 48
I have the Airport Express and use it with a Bel Canto DAC2. It's a great little device. However, it must be used with Apple's itunes software. That's not a big problem unless you want to use a codec for your music other than mp3, wav, alac, aiff and aac. Again, not a problem as I have used alac for a while now.

From what I can tell about the sb3 is that you can use many more codecs like flac and ogg. I am not positive about this but from what I've seen on the website and read here, you can use a remote to control it and do not have to use a computer like with the AX. You can also stream internet radio, pandora.com and others with the sb3.

That's my basic understanding. Hopefully some others will provide more detail.
 
Mar 3, 2006 at 11:41 PM Post #3 of 48
Thanks, tyrion. Can any other software out there play ALAC files? Or are you locked into iTunes?

The Sonos seems very competitive from a hardware standpoint, although more expensive. Their remote control is just killer.
 
Mar 3, 2006 at 11:44 PM Post #4 of 48
Quote:

Originally Posted by insomniac
Thanks, tyrion. Can any other software out there play ALAC files? Or are you locked into iTunes?

The Sonos seems very competitive from a hardware standpoint, although more expensive. Their remote control is just killer.



That's a good question. I've never tried to play ALAC on anything other than itunes. In fact, that's a question, I should've asked before I ordered my sb3. I know it plays AAC so hopefully, I won't have to re-rip all my cd's.

I know even less about the Sonos than I do about the sb3.
 
Mar 4, 2006 at 12:03 AM Post #6 of 48
A good not-too-technical review of the SB3 is on the Register Web site

http://www.reghardware.co.uk/2006/03..._squeezebox_3/

I have an SB / SB2 based setup - see details of the rig I took to the recent Bay Area meet - and peoples reactions in the impressions thread. (see posts 42, 59, 50, ...)

http://www4.head-fi.org/forums/showthread.php?t=165859

For me, it was a variety of things - separation of the software based back end - from the hardware font end. Use of open source software etc etc.

A lot of things seemed "right" and just made sense to me. Having started with a Rio Karma, I already had ripped my CD's to FLAC. YMMV.

Plus how can you not like a company that has an objectivist CEO who checks out power supplies?

http://www.seanadams.com/smps_vs_linear/

G.


Voltron has just taken the plunge. It'll be interesting to see what he thinks.
 
Mar 4, 2006 at 12:03 AM Post #7 of 48
Quote:

Originally Posted by PsychoZX
I believe the Squeezebox can handle ALAC just fine.


That's good news. I was not looking forward to ripping all my cd's again.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Grahame
Voltron has just taken the plunge. It'll be interesting to see what he thinks.


Somehow I think he is finished with his court appearance. He should have that thing up and running by now with a full review and pics.
icon10.gif
 
Mar 4, 2006 at 12:34 AM Post #9 of 48
Quote:

Originally Posted by insomniac
Can any other software out there play ALAC files? Or are you locked into iTunes?


You're not exactly locked into iTunes. QuickTime's ALAC support can be called by other software, so other clients can in fact play ALAC if they know how to interface to QuickTime for it.

The Squeezebox backend (SlimServer) uses this trick behind the scenes when an ALAC file is requested: it calls QuickTime to decompress the file, then it streams the result to the Squeezebox as FLAC, which the Squeezebox plays natively.

I am using this feature and can testify that it works.* But if I pause playback, the tune resumes from the beginning. So it's not a 100% perfect solution.

*[size=xx-small]And to those curious enough to ask, yes, different Squeezeboxes on the same network can play different ALACs simultaneously.[/size]
 
Mar 4, 2006 at 12:47 AM Post #10 of 48
Quote:

Originally Posted by episiarch
You're not exactly locked into iTunes. QuickTime's ALAC support can be called by other software, so other clients can in fact play ALAC if they know how to interface to QuickTime for it.

The Squeezebox backend (SlimServer) uses this trick behind the scenes when an ALAC file is requested: it calls QuickTime to decompress the file, then it streams the result to the Squeezebox as FLAC, which the Squeezebox plays natively.

I am using this feature and can testify that it works.* But if I pause playback, the tune resumes from the beginning. So it's not a 100% perfect solution.

*[size=xx-small]And to those curious enough to ask, yes, different Squeezeboxes on the same network can play different ALACs simultaneously.[/size]



A brute force solution, if you have enough storage
evil_smiley.gif
, to the pause-restart-FFWD-REW issue is to transcode all your ALACS to FLAC
(overnight, right
very_evil_smiley.gif
?) . Native support for positioning in FLAC files - no re-ripping required.

Big thread on just this issue in the Slim devices forums here

http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=20693
 
Mar 4, 2006 at 12:53 AM Post #11 of 48
Quote:

Originally Posted by Grahame
A brute force solution, if you have enough storage
evil_smiley.gif
, to the pause-restart-FFWD-REW issue is to transcode all your ALACS to FLAC
(overnight, right
very_evil_smiley.gif
?) . Native support for positioning in FLAC files - no re-ripping required.



Pretty open to that, actually. Do you have a script or tool that does that?

What I'd really like to do (I think) is rip with EAC and let some daemon compress copies to FLAC, ALAC and LAME/APS at its leisure. That'd be sweet. But didn't Bangraman (or was it Blessingx?) post a thread about that recently in which nobody had a really good solution?

Edit: now that I've read that thread on the Slim forums, I see there's something called dbpoweramp that seems to do this. Hmm.

I already gained spousal permission to build a dedicated music server, so when I do, I may very well put something like this into effect. Thanks for the pointer, Grahame.
 
Mar 4, 2006 at 1:00 AM Post #13 of 48
Quote:

Originally Posted by episiarch
Pretty open to that, actually. Do you have a script or tool that does that?

What I'd really like to do (I think) is rip with EAC and let some daemon compress copies to FLAC, ALAC and LAME/APS at its leisure. That'd be sweet. But didn't Bangraman (or was it Blessingx?) post a thread about that recently in which nobody had a really good solution?



Check out the links to MAX in my edited post re: the discussion on ALAC/FLAC

or here

http://sbooth.org/Max/

Looks like MAX is shaping up to be a viable solution for Mac users to this issue.
 
Mar 4, 2006 at 3:29 AM Post #15 of 48
Quote:

Originally Posted by episiarch
But if I pause playback, the tune resumes from the beginning. So it's not a 100% perfect solution.


I'm about 90% sure you're just using the remote wrong. When you pause it, if you press play to unpause it, it'll start from the beginning; if you press pause again to unpause it, it'll continue where you are. This has always seemed weird to me, and I don't understand why it's that way, but there you are.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top