Quote:
Originally Posted by Covenant /img/forum/go_quote.gif
Would running independant power supplies for each o22 actually be of benefit, beyond the aesthetic appeal of knowing each channel's power supply is completely dedicated?
|
If by "power supplies" (bolded in quote) you mean power transformers, then no, there is no real benefit in a β22 serving as a headphone amp in 3-channel active ground configuration. If you plan to also use the β22 as a speaker amp, then it boils down to whether it's easier to fit 3 smaller transformers vs. one big one in your choice of case.
Quote:
I'm intending to build a 3-channel beta22 fed by three o22's, and the choice of toroid would likely be between one Plitron 500VA (the same encapsulated one you're using for your prototype B24, AMB), or three avel-lindberg 100VA toroids. |
The Plitron I'm using for my β24 is not really a good choice for your application. First, 500VA is hugely overkill for the β22 in any configuration. Second, that Plitron has
four 30V secondaries, which works nicely for a 2-channel or 4-channel amp (two secondaries are wired in series to make a 60V center tapped). For a 3-channel amp, it doesn't divide up as neatly.
Thus, it makes more sense to use either three smaller transformers or one bigger one (each one having two secondaries or a single center-tapped secondary).
Note that if you're planning to use the ε22 backplane board, then it only has provisions for a single σ22 PSU board to supply all three β22 boards.
Quote:
I'm leaning in the direction of three 100VA units, as i expect the benefits of a shielded, encapsulated toroid like the Plitron would be largely pedantic and more for bragging rights than any actual benefit with the PSU in a seperate enclosure. |
Shielding of the transformer is not needed if you're going to put it in a separate box from the amp. Encapsulation is a nicety (appearance and mechanical vibration control) but not necessary.