sebhuber
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Apr 28, 2009
- Posts
- 306
- Likes
- 13
*Disclaimer: all of the theories stated below have developed through research (to some extent) and perception (subjective view)
Therefore in no way, I am trying to publish a finished idea, however I am trying to reach a conclusion on this particular subject.
Small introduction:
I am currently studying at a school in England for an IB diploma. Throughout the last year, I have become aware of the emotion&perception related to music. One song sounding good on a particular day on the same equipment sounds better another etc. At first I was trying to find the best budget vs. performance ratio, but soon gave up. My taste in music gives me a good reference to how gears compare to each other and one particular IEM stood out: Sennheiser's IE8.
It completely immersed me and I have been enjoying it ever since. From that day on I tried to find out what was so special about the design and it's impact on the sonic signature.
It has been noted that the IE8's soundstage is one of the largest and I have found that the imaging is also very precise & very 3D like.
However it was not until I found out about wave deffraction in Physics, when I had a small breakthrough with my theory about the soundstage.
Main part:
The IE8 is distinctly designed with two major features often not found in other IEMs: the Bass knob and the very large design.
The bass knob acts as a vent for the rather large driver, the more air is let inside, the greater the bass is tuned up. This feature impacts isolation, still the whole sound becomes very "full", which, in my view makes it more of an extra, than a drawback.
The other feature is the design. And this might also give you some insight on why it's soundstage might be perceived as being so large.
The tube between the driver, has a certain diameter, diffracting the sound pressure waves and spreading out the energy. Therefore the over-all sound is perceived as being "wider", without a loss in energy. A very basic diagram shows my theory: https://apwiki.wdfiles.com/local--fi...iffraction.gif
Now I would like to address a view questions at the community: Am I completely wrong or could there be some form of truth behind this idea?
I will be updating this thread, if I gain more insight, but for now: Happy listening
Therefore in no way, I am trying to publish a finished idea, however I am trying to reach a conclusion on this particular subject.
Small introduction:
I am currently studying at a school in England for an IB diploma. Throughout the last year, I have become aware of the emotion&perception related to music. One song sounding good on a particular day on the same equipment sounds better another etc. At first I was trying to find the best budget vs. performance ratio, but soon gave up. My taste in music gives me a good reference to how gears compare to each other and one particular IEM stood out: Sennheiser's IE8.
It completely immersed me and I have been enjoying it ever since. From that day on I tried to find out what was so special about the design and it's impact on the sonic signature.
It has been noted that the IE8's soundstage is one of the largest and I have found that the imaging is also very precise & very 3D like.
However it was not until I found out about wave deffraction in Physics, when I had a small breakthrough with my theory about the soundstage.
Main part:
The IE8 is distinctly designed with two major features often not found in other IEMs: the Bass knob and the very large design.
The bass knob acts as a vent for the rather large driver, the more air is let inside, the greater the bass is tuned up. This feature impacts isolation, still the whole sound becomes very "full", which, in my view makes it more of an extra, than a drawback.
The other feature is the design. And this might also give you some insight on why it's soundstage might be perceived as being so large.
The tube between the driver, has a certain diameter, diffracting the sound pressure waves and spreading out the energy. Therefore the over-all sound is perceived as being "wider", without a loss in energy. A very basic diagram shows my theory: https://apwiki.wdfiles.com/local--fi...iffraction.gif
Now I would like to address a view questions at the community: Am I completely wrong or could there be some form of truth behind this idea?
I will be updating this thread, if I gain more insight, but for now: Happy listening