A lot of assumptions here. You seem to know that the ZX300 will have inferior sound quality, build quality and battery life without ever personally seeing, touching or listening to a ZX300. And you know all this because? Because it is less expensive? The ZX300 could quite possibly sound better, be better constructed and have longer run time. Best to wait until you have actual experience before steering others.
A lot of assumptions here. You seem to know that the ZX300 will have inferior sound quality, build quality and battery life without ever personally seeing, touching or listening to a ZX300. And you know all this because? Because it is less expensive? The ZX300 could quite possibly sound better, be better constructed and have longer run time. Best to wait until you have actual experience before steering others.
Have already tried the ZX300A in one the Sony hearing events. I like it a lot actually. Sort of spiced up a bit, like the A-series Walkman. Less reference than 1A. I already have an F-series Walkman for that kind of sound(Of course ZX300A is not nearly as "spiced up" as that). As for the 1A, I already have the PCM-D100 for that kind of signature and also doubles as field microphone.
I did say ZX300 has the same S-Master chip just below that line and tried to justify ZX300 as well. I apologize if I "steered" into the more expensive 1A purchase too much for your taste.
I personally bought the 1Z eventually due to larger internal storage and better pairing with MDR-EX1000. If you don't have needs for that, ZX300 can easily fit 200+GB of songs and still offer 200mW per channel output in balanced out. Pretty neat if you ask me.
IMO a lot of things in this hobby is about feeling and how you personally enjoy things instead of measurements or "the correct sound". If I'm really dying for the "correct sound" I'll be playing my piano all the time, but alas, neither have the time nor would that really be the "correct sound" all the time, given physical limitations of my room and my own pianism's limitations.
Nothing gives you that magic of listening to your favourite music on the go again, whether that be a Walkman or an iPod. I guess we've just been on the chase ever since.
By the way I think the F-series Walkmans are great. Very cheap now and has a great kick to its sound when playing pop songs. Love listening to 80s rock on those.
I was not enjoying Sony NW-WM1A until I went balanced. I have balanced Surf Cables in Sony 4.4mm termination for Audioquest Nighthawk headphones, Shure SRH1540s, and Shure SE846s. My Diana has been sitting, because I love the Sony's liquid, organic sound. Single ended sucks; barely better than an iPod. Give the balanced amp 150 to 200 hours of burn in and you will love it; especially 96khz/24 bit. My Shure SE846s are actually using ALO Reference 8 balanced cables.
It's all relative. Both Sandisk and Mac use base 10 so it will show "larger" capacity but each file will also appear larger compared to base 2 which shows less capacity, but also the files are smaller. You will get exactly the same number of files stored regardless of which method is used since the physical number of bits is fixed. If you really want to play with capacity, you will definitely get real differences with the various levels of FLAC compression or ALAC.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.