Radian
New Head-Fier
- Joined
- Dec 19, 2002
- Posts
- 5
- Likes
- 0
I've used the 7506 for a long time and recently bought a 7509. The bass is overemphasized. I had a couple of my colleagues test it out and they also thought it was was "boomy" in the lower frequencies. One test was with a pro Mackie mixer, one with a portable CD player, and several tests with a 24 channel Soundcraft mixer, various broadcast digital VTR decks and a home mini-system. I haven't given it a burn-in period but I somehow doubt it'll make a big difference with this set. This said, I'm keeping them simply because they're used in countless feature film productions and studios. When your industry decides on a certain piece of equipment by sheer popularity it's sort of like whether you like it or not you have to have it on hand for reference.
The high end is another story. I don't find it as shrill as the 7506. It's defined, with the right touch of warmth, if that makes any sense at all.
The construction is excellent. Many cans do not come close IMO to these but the real test will be the years of abuse awaiting them in my work. The 7506, although decent, doesn't really compare in this regard.
If you're used to the 7506, you may find these pretty big sized too. But within reasonable limits I'd say.
If you're just using them for pleasure, throwing in a little EQ in line to tame bass will make them pleasureable, ie. if you're not a purist and don't mind going that route. I've seen "fun" used in some threads to describe punchy sound. These are punchy and tight, following the signature of their little 7506 brother. More isolation, a somewhat increased soundstage and better handling of the highs are the difference soundwise.
But the way Sony's 7509 story ends is interesting. As popular as the MDR series has become in the pro field, many people have found themselves foregoing the 7509 in favor the older 7506. I suspect the bass issue has something to do with it. Still, scores of 7509s are still out there and being used. If Sony ever decides to refine the model with better bass I'm sure many 7506 defectors will come back.
-Radian
The high end is another story. I don't find it as shrill as the 7506. It's defined, with the right touch of warmth, if that makes any sense at all.
The construction is excellent. Many cans do not come close IMO to these but the real test will be the years of abuse awaiting them in my work. The 7506, although decent, doesn't really compare in this regard.
If you're used to the 7506, you may find these pretty big sized too. But within reasonable limits I'd say.
If you're just using them for pleasure, throwing in a little EQ in line to tame bass will make them pleasureable, ie. if you're not a purist and don't mind going that route. I've seen "fun" used in some threads to describe punchy sound. These are punchy and tight, following the signature of their little 7506 brother. More isolation, a somewhat increased soundstage and better handling of the highs are the difference soundwise.
But the way Sony's 7509 story ends is interesting. As popular as the MDR series has become in the pro field, many people have found themselves foregoing the 7509 in favor the older 7506. I suspect the bass issue has something to do with it. Still, scores of 7509s are still out there and being used. If Sony ever decides to refine the model with better bass I'm sure many 7506 defectors will come back.
-Radian