"at a sony store"...oh okay.
I own(ed) both at the same time...lots and lots of testing in my quiet home office. It's what I found. And most have come to the same conclusion as well if they've actually owned both. Sony tweaked them for sure.
"for me"
No need to be snide. We get it, you have golden ears.
FWIW, I'm talking about cabled mode. In BT mode, it's quite a bit more different: I think Sony put a bit of an EQ on it or something when it's run through Bluetooth.
When I mean 'inconclusive', I mean 'dunno if the 1ABT or the 1A sounds better, just a tad different'. Compared both in wired both to make sure it wasn't EQ tricks making all the difference.
I put the differences to the fact that the hollow chamber in the 1A is no longer hollow, instead packed with all the Bluetooth parts (DAC, amp, Bluetooth receiver, batteries), and is it different? Yes. Is it
significantly different? Not really. Not quite a completely different headphone. Yes, you can tell them apart, just like how you can tell if someone flicked the EQ switch while you're playing music.
Don't get me wrong, I don't hate the 1A, it's just that my bass preferences have changed over time a bit. I usually take everything <100Hz down 6dB when I'm using it to reduce the bloat a bit. If it's a quiet environment, I don't need it then. For reference, I think the HD600 has anaemic bass, and the HD700 about right for me.