The D25S sounds bright, thin, and piercing from the line-out. The 141 sounds much better, its sound is warm and smooth with punchy bass. The 555 does sound the best of the three but I don't really remember its sound characteristics. 555 would be the best choice but the 141 is solid too.
Originally posted by oas Which is a better player?
I've never compared the two.. but the D-555 is purportedly a LOT better than the D-25S.. But the D-25S is a lot easier to obtain than a D-555... But there must be a reason why the D-555's go for $150+, while the D-25S's go for $40+shipping...
[EDIT]: Although I must say that the D-25S certainly looks VERY cool.. But the D-555, with it's LCD and the orange glow it emits.. is also a sight to see..
Price is no indication of sound quality. I have seen the coveted d-777 go for over $300 on e-bay. Is the sound quality twice as nice as my Denon DCM-360 home rig cd player. I think not. The D25-s is from Silicon Salvage which sells old and refurbished electronics. They are appealing to the general public, not PCDP junkies. The D-777 and D-555's prices have been driven up primarily due to this board and the reviews of it here. If one reads closely to the reviews here there are a lot of opinions on which player sounds the best. Some even like the D25-s the best. This should tell you that it is all a matter of taste and a lot of times ownership. I own the legendary Optimus CD-3400 and I think it sounds terrible compared to my D25-s, but the legend of the Optimus grows as time goes by. In my opinion the best bargain is the D25-s. The difference between this cd player and the D-555 is subjective. People say the D25-s is too bright. I think it is just right. I don't want to pay an extra $100 for subjectivity and serial number recognition. doug
I tested it with a sennheiser hd580 and meta42. I also tested lots of other portable players - Sony D303, D515, D555, D-777, D-141, D-FJ401, D-311, DE-900, and the D-25S was the worst of the bunch.
And I'm not the only one complaining about the thin sound either, another user, gloco I believe it was, said the same thing.
True. While price is no indication of sound quality, it's a good predictor, especially for older players that people know about. Nobody's going to pay $200 for a crappy Sony or other PCDP. However, bidding wars can get fierce for D-555's D-777's, D-515's, D-303's, etc. I got my D-777 for half that $300 you're referring to... I've seen it go for a lot less than $200 before. So while price does vary greatly, it is a good predictor of sound quality. Me? I don't like the D-25S or D-150, as they are overly bright (to my ears). The D-35 was somewhere in between those and the D-555 and D-303 in terms of sound quality.
It's also somewhere in between in price.
Very subjective, yes, but like I said.. it's a good predictor, and very little else.
To follow up what I was saying, people assume that the D25-s is worth a 1/4th of what a used d-555's price tag is. The reasons the d25-S gets overlooked is that it is readily available in new condition and it comes with a modest price tag. For these two reasons people overlook this player. Audio people can be very fickle. When you make an audio component hard to obtain coupled with a high price tag, people assume the sound is a lot better. I have heard terms describing the sounds of these players that they are head and shoulders better than the rest. I own a couple of the coveted players, namely the Optimus, and a brand new D-303. I like the d25-s the best. I think the D-303 has a dark tonal quality. The bass is slightly thick. To others this would be normal and probably desired. I think the d25-s is simply a gorgeous player, built like a tank, with great sound, and it's new!! What more can you ask for. To me I would much rather have that than a used $150 player that is subjectivly better, not built as well, and is in used condition most of the time. People tend to want what is hard to get!! I am always wary about audio reviews. There are a lot of others things that come into play other than just sheer sound quality when judging equipment. doug
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.