PSmith08
1000+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2005
- Posts
- 1,422
- Likes
- 11
Quote:
I'm not sure that I'll agree with the contention that Böhm's Wagner brings out the absolute best. It's an interpretation and a reasonable one at that, but to say that he trumps Furtwängler, Knappertsbusch, and Keilberth (i.a.) is going a little far for me. That goes for his Tristan as well, but I should note that it doesn't make my top-three list, which Bernstein's set tops, so my position probably isn't normative. There's more to say, but the dedicated Wagner thread seems a better venue.
Originally Posted by DavidMahler /img/forum/go_quote.gif I trust Bohm with Wagner more than any other conductor (including Furtwangler) because I think his conducting brings out the absolute best in the orchestral writing.......if you compare Bohm's Tristan to any other version, it is really mind-opening.....you may not agree that its the best, but you will agree that it is better than most. His approach seems less weighty than Solti's. Wagner is very easy to weigh down. |
I'm not sure that I'll agree with the contention that Böhm's Wagner brings out the absolute best. It's an interpretation and a reasonable one at that, but to say that he trumps Furtwängler, Knappertsbusch, and Keilberth (i.a.) is going a little far for me. That goes for his Tristan as well, but I should note that it doesn't make my top-three list, which Bernstein's set tops, so my position probably isn't normative. There's more to say, but the dedicated Wagner thread seems a better venue.