bln
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Dec 25, 2003
- Posts
- 1,554
- Likes
- 11
You make unsubstantiated claims in your "translation," though. Mikhail says his circuit isn't the same as Chu Moy's, and your translation is "he's lying."
Originally Posted by bln You make unsubstantiated claims in your "translation," though. Mikhail says his circuit isn't the same as Chu Moy's, and your translation is "he's lying." |
Originally Posted by bln You make unsubstantiated claims in your "translation," though. Mikhail says his circuit isn't the same as Chu Moy's, and your translation is "he's lying." |
Originally Posted by Mikhail The circuit, implementation, layout, power supply and other aspects of our design are ours. |
Originally Posted by akio names don't mean jack sh-t to me, i couldn't care less whether something is "class a" or whatever. if it was class a would you think it sounds any better? mislabeled, maybe. saying that just because an amp doesn't live up to a name = bad is just wrong. |
Originally Posted by akio head-fi has really pissed me off. we have a builder building amps that do not break and that sound better than any tube amp we have ever had for headphones. i am pretty sure this fact is uncontested. |
Originally Posted by akio names and labels and wiring jobs will not change the fact that my mpx3 probably sounds much, much better than your woo audio's or mapletrees or otl32's or whatever. blow off. go listen to some music. |
ick now i really would like to know how you would consider any single ended output stage to be other than Class a up to the clipping point. Since one device handles the entire waveform how can it be none other than class a up to the clipping point. This is true of the seekers amp as well as all the single ended OTL Amps when you run out of current or voltage swing you are clipping and otherwise any single ended output stage is Class A up to the clipping point Am i incorrect in this statement? |
Originally Posted by Edwood OK, I'm going out on a limb here. Is it entirely out of the question to simply ask Mikhail to build an amp with super neat wiring work inside for whatever extra labor it would cost? Mikhail does build customized amps for his customers. Is it too much to ask for a "special" MPX3 "AE" or Supra "AE"? If it really bothers you that much, and you want to buy a Single Power amp, why not ask? -Ed |
Originally Posted by akio all that matters to me is SQ and reliability ... i couldn't care less whether something is "class a" or whatever. if it was class a would you think it sounds any better? mislabeled, maybe. saying that just because an amp doesn't live up to a name = bad is just wrong. |
Originally Posted by Wodgy Let me make this absolutely clear: I am not accusing Mikhail of either lying or malice or deception. Please stop putting words to that effect in my mouth. I do not want his lawyers on my back. Mikhail's words are carefully couched to avoid core issues. This may mislead people. That is all I am saying. There is nothing new under the sun in terms of tube amps. Mikhail did not invent the White cathode follower. Neither did Chu Moy, for that matter. |
Originally Posted by braillediver Here’s an interesting question about having a patent pending. http://www.audioasylum.com/audio/gen...es/350087.html |