Germancub
500+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Dec 18, 2006
- Posts
- 527
- Likes
- 30
Quote:
Maybe I explained it wrong and I apologise... the RS-1s are by far brighter than the 840s. The M50s aren't "dark" in the treble area... I just find the midrange distant and the soundtage a bit compressed, especially when directly compared to the 840s. I've tried them on numerous amps and iPods and the outcome was the same but I only noticed this drastically when I directly compared them to the 840s. The M50s are great headphones and I dont think you can go wrong but good lord the 840s impressed me and keep on impressing me. If I paid $500 for them I still would think just as highly of them, to me they're that good.
Originally Posted by earfonia /img/forum/go_quote.gif Thanks a lot! Indeed, your comment makes me confused I had Grado RS-1 as well, and tried some other good cans such as K701. Indeed RS-1 is brighter than M50, but M50 to me is not veiled at all. M50 sounds differently on different amp, could it be that your amp that caused M50 sounds veiled? At least direct connection to iPod, it doesn't sound veiled at all. Thanks for your feedback anyway! From there it seems that SRH840 sounds a lot brighter than the M50. Does SRH840 sound as bright as the Grado RS-1? |
Maybe I explained it wrong and I apologise... the RS-1s are by far brighter than the 840s. The M50s aren't "dark" in the treble area... I just find the midrange distant and the soundtage a bit compressed, especially when directly compared to the 840s. I've tried them on numerous amps and iPods and the outcome was the same but I only noticed this drastically when I directly compared them to the 840s. The M50s are great headphones and I dont think you can go wrong but good lord the 840s impressed me and keep on impressing me. If I paid $500 for them I still would think just as highly of them, to me they're that good.