Originally Posted by Pianist /img/forum/go_quote.gif
...
HP50 is an awesome sounding headphone. It sure has a really high quality sound for a closed back and is in many ways sounds close to the best headphones there are. In terms of resolution, refinement and tonal balance I find them to be among the best headphones I've ever heard. The mids on the HP50 are fantastic and vocals are among the best I've heard on headphones - very close to the midrange performance of the Sennheiser HD600/650. With that being said, I do find the SRH1540 to be a step up from the HP50 in overall sound quality. The tonal balance on the Shures suffers a bit compared to HP50 due to that excessive sub bass boost IMO, but the Shures have a noticeable edge over HP50 in separation, sense of space and overall clarity, as well as tonal balance from the mid bass on up. HP50 is clear with excellent resolution, but doesn't sound very spacious to my ears - just OK and perhaps better than average for a closed back headphone. I think the main issue with HP50 is the emphasis on upper bass and lower mids which I find somewhat excessive. I think that it makes the HP50 sound overly bloomy (bloomy, not boomy!) or chesty, somewhat too forward and congested. SRH1540 gives sounds a more appropriate sense of distance and space to my ears, free of congestion that can sometimes plague the HP50. Or perhaps this is just due to somewhat high quality, more resolving drivers in the SRH1540. Not sure about that. I find the mids on the SRH1540 to also be more resolving than those of the HP50 in terms of micro detail retrieval, even though HP50 is no slouch in midrange performance at all.
...