Should I go with the M50's?
Nov 30, 2011 at 11:53 AM Thread Starter Post #1 of 28

loliwin

Head-Fier
Joined
Nov 29, 2011
Posts
61
Likes
12
Alright guys, I narrowed my search down to this. My buddy just bought the beats pro and I kinda wanna show him up. Out of these which would be the best?
 
- Sennheiser HD25-1 II
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B000TDZOXG/ref=ox_sc_act_title_1?ie=UTF8&m=ATVPDKIKX0DER
 
- Audio-Technica ATHM50S WITH FiiO E7
http://www.amazon.com/Audio-Technica-ATHM50S-Professional-Monitor-Headphones/dp/B004ZG9TMA/ref=sr_1_3?s=electronics&ie=UTF8&qid=1322624572&sr=1-3
 
- Ultrasone HFI-580
 http://www.amazon.com/Ultrasone-HFI-580-Surround-Professional-Headphones/dp/B00101UHS8
 
- Beats Pro
http://www.monstercable.com/outletstore/linelist.asp
 
 
I've heard some great things about the M50s and I'm leaning towards them.
 
Nov 30, 2011 at 12:14 PM Post #2 of 28
This model isn't on your list of considerations, but have you looked at the Beyerdynamic DT770?  If bass is what you're looking for then they're a good choice; the bass is powerful, but controlled.  Mids are a bit recessed, but accurate and the highs are extended.  They're best used with an amp, though.  Do you plan on using these at home or on the go?  What's important to you aside from bass?
 
Nov 30, 2011 at 12:43 PM Post #6 of 28
Go with the 580's if your looking for bass heavy cans, better than the m50's and a great deal on BH photo ($118 shipped) today.  Sony XB500's have more bass but sacrifice mids/highs (much like Beats).  The Beats Pro are actually decent headphones, just don't think they're worth the $449 price tag.
 
Nov 30, 2011 at 1:33 PM Post #11 of 28
They're good cans, however, not exactly bass heavy.  They have a strong bass presence but nothing like Beats.  I also enjoyed the mids/highs/soundstage of the Ultrasones, the M50's are a studio monitor with good bass.  Up to you, there's lots of comparisons on this site, generally Ultrasones are considered superior but when they're $150-$160, not worth the upgrade when M50's are $30 or so cheaper (which is not hte case now).
 
Quote:
Idk why I'm still leaning toward the m50s.



 
 
Nov 30, 2011 at 1:52 PM Post #12 of 28
You'll be glad you bought the M50s. Really a great value. They are in my opinion very accurate. I'm happy with the bass, mids and highs. If your budget is $100-$200 this is the best deal (although I would also recommend the Sony CB 1000s for $188 at The Sound Professionals if they have any left).
 
Nov 30, 2011 at 1:52 PM Post #13 of 28


Quote:
They're good cans, however, not exactly bass heavy.  They have a strong bass presence but nothing like Beats.  I also enjoyed the mids/highs/soundstage of the Ultrasones, the M50's are a studio monitor with good bass.  Up to you, there's lots of comparisons on this site, generally Ultrasones are considered superior but when they're $150-$160, not worth the upgrade when M50's are $30 or so cheaper (which is not hte case now).
 


 


Other reviews that I've read say that the M50's have better bass out of the two.
 
 
Nov 30, 2011 at 1:57 PM Post #14 of 28
I got some M50s a few nights ago.  So far the highs are a little to bright for me and there is just and average amount of bass for me.  The sound stage is pretty good though.  I would say that the M50 is more of a stuido monitor than they are DJ headphones.  I guess I will see after I break mine in fully. 
 
Nov 30, 2011 at 2:10 PM Post #15 of 28
I own the m50s and the sennheiser hd 25 1 ii. Yes the m50 is a decent headphone but it is not that great compared to the other options in or around it's price range. If you can trust anyone it would be more. I have experience with these 2 headphones as i own them. My vote goes to the sennheiser hd 25 1 ii.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top