Quote:
Quote:
Not true. There is only ONE Sony player EVER to have a dedicated line-out (or even an integrated one). That was the Sony MZ-2P, produced in 1992. I have the current top-of-the-line MZ-E900 -- no line-out |
Again I was referring to the current breed of minidisc players/recorders. Your talking about a peice of anicent history. |
Read it again -- you claimed (and I quote) "Also there are SONY minidisc PLAYERS not recorders that do have dedicated line-out's." I responded that not only are there no CURRENT Sony players with line-out, but that there has only been ONE... EVER. I was directly refuting your claim that the "current breed of players" has line-out. They don't.
Quote:
Quote:
LOL! That's a marketing ploy |
No it's not, Sharp use's better DACS they are 24 bit, Sony=20 bit that is a fact. GO find me a link where it shows a current or even old SONY one using a 24bit DAC. |
That's not the point -- the point is that, as Thomas explained, 24-bit vs. 20-bit in an MD player is pretty much irrelevant. They simply decode the ATRAC-encoded content on the MD played. What is *far* more important is the algorithm used in the encoding process, which has NOTHING to do with 20-bit vs. 24-bit. But more on that later...
Quote:
I understand that but from a technical point of view sharp and yes it is known in the minidisc community that sharp are better in the sound quality department. |
Again, you're just wrong on this. I am an active member in the MD community, on the largest mailing list and in the two or three most popular Internet message boards. This "consensus" that you claim on Sharp sounding better simply does not exist. The educated MD users will say exactly what I said: that Sony is more accurate, Sharp is "warmer," and that which sounds better depends on individual preferences. There is no "better."
Quote:
Quote:
The truth is that the headphone output on Sony MD portables is more flat and *accurate* that the headphone output of Sharp MD portables.
|
That's ********, cause I own both sony and sharp minidisc players and when using line out they sound very similar, except I find the sharp to sound better when using hi-fi headphones. |
Thanks for proving my point -- if what you say is true, then that means that the line-outs signals are similar, but the headphone outputs are different. And that is *exactly* what is happening -- Sharp EQ's their headphone outputs to sound "warmer." You happen to prefer that sound to Sony's more accurate sound -- and there's nothing wrong with that. But your statement above proves what I've been saying all along.
Quote:
Now if your talking about using the normal headphone out, not the line-out, than yes the sharp is more warmer, due to it's DAC. |
That is also completely incorrect -- the *exact* same DAC is used whether you use the line-out or headphone jack. The reason they sound different is that the EQ on the headphone output is set differently than the flatter line-out signal.
Quote:
Oh please, now your making this up as a fact, I mean of you feel that is the reason than so be it, but don't state that as fact. |
What I wrote *is* fact. The facts are that 1) Sharps have traditionally had more powerful headphone jacks. It's well-established in the audio industry that given two identical signals at different sound levels, most consumers will say that the louder one sounds "better." 2) Sharp EQ's their headphone output to be "warmer" sounding -- they feel that this is better for portable applications. Most consumers equate more upper bass to be better than less. Those are both facts. I'm not saying Sony is better -- I'm saying that the average consumer will prefer Sharp's sound, but *not* because the sound is more accurate. And that's a very valid argument, especially here in this forum.
Quote:
Listen I understand people have differnet tastes in sound, so if you like the SONY and enjoy it, than all the power to you, but SHARP does have better sound componets in there players , mainly the DAC's. |
Again, that's simply incorrect. And for the record, if you'd read my posts thoroughly, you'd see that I actually said I like the EQ of Sharp headphone jacks better in a portable application. I'm just objective enough to know that it's because of the EQ, not because it's "better" in any way. And despite my good feelings towards Sharp units, I am also objective enough to admit that Sony units have more accurate headphone outputs.
Quote:
Now can anyone tell the difference when listening without and amp, probably not, the only way I feel you could tell the difference without using an amp is with the Etymotic ER4P, try those out and compare the two. Make sure you don't use the MEGABASS it degrads the sound quality. |
LOL! Like after everything I've been saying, I'm going to compare using MegaBass
As for comparisons, I own a Sony MZ-R50, Sony MZ-E900, Sharp MS-722, MS-702MK, JVC FS-MD900, and Sharp MD-X5. I have also used a Sony MZ-R90 extensively. I own or have owned an X-CANv2, HeadRoom Little and HeadRoom Airhead amps. I own or have owned Sennheiser HD600, HD580, Etymotics ER4S, Grado SR60, Sony V6/7506, and various Koss headphones. I think based on that equipment lineup, I am pretty qualified to say whether or not there is a noticeable difference between the sound of Sony and Sharp units. The fact is that the headphone jack of Sharp units has a different EQ than the headphone jack of Sony units. I can tell this in a blind test on any one of my headphones. The Sony's sound closer to the original CD, while the Sharp's sound "warmer" -- because of EQ. I personally prefer the sound of Sharp when going portable, but it's not technically superior in any way.
And here's another thing that invalidates your position -- while there is a *clear* and *audible* difference between Sony and Sharp using the headphone jack, when using the line-out jacks on these various units, the Sony and Sharp units sound almost identical. That means that the difference is NOT the DAC or the DSP, but rather solely in the EQ of the headphone jacks.
Quote:
I'm not here saying that it's a FACT sharp sound is better, cause I can't say that, since sound is a matter fs taste, but from a technial point of view I feel i can. |
Even on technical terms, you can't say that. Sony and Sharp units both have their technical advantages and disadvantages. Neither is clearly superior to the other.
Quote:
Sony is well known to go cheapo on most everything they make in the audio world. |
Now who's making things up? LOL Yes, Sony makes some cheap products (especially headphones!), but you can't use that as a blanket condemnation of all their products just to try to salvage your untenable position.
P.S. Thanks for the good posts, thomas.