Febs
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Mar 25, 2005
- Posts
- 2,853
- Likes
- 12
Quote:
If you read some of his reviews, it is "quite obvious" that he does "actually listen to his equipment." For example, he writes, "Audio is about listening and every piece of audio equipment stands or falls on its performance in the listening room. Listening is an all-important part of equipment evaluation ...." He qualifies that latter sentence by explaining that listening needs to be structured and meaningful in order to provide a valid basis for evaluation, but he clearly values listening in the evaluation and review process. In fact, he goes on to observe that, "even under properly controlled listening conditions numerous audio components will sound different and therefore require subjective evaluation."
Quote:
Again, Aczel does not claim that all amps sound the same. He claims that all amps that measure the same sound the same, and that differences in sound can be empirically observed.
For example, on page 14 of the article I linked to, he writes
Quote:
Originally Posted by memepool /img/forum/go_quote.gif Although both would no doubt claim to adhere to the same scientific principles the difference is that one actually listens to his equipment and the other quite obviously doesn't look further than the end of his slide rule. |
If you read some of his reviews, it is "quite obvious" that he does "actually listen to his equipment." For example, he writes, "Audio is about listening and every piece of audio equipment stands or falls on its performance in the listening room. Listening is an all-important part of equipment evaluation ...." He qualifies that latter sentence by explaining that listening needs to be structured and meaningful in order to provide a valid basis for evaluation, but he clearly values listening in the evaluation and review process. In fact, he goes on to observe that, "even under properly controlled listening conditions numerous audio components will sound different and therefore require subjective evaluation."
Quote:
Science is about empirical observation not arguing from a priori first principles. If enough people claim amps sound different then the question is why do they sound different and what other measurements should be made to try and explain this, rather than denying there is any difference in the first place. That's called dogma. |
Again, Aczel does not claim that all amps sound the same. He claims that all amps that measure the same sound the same, and that differences in sound can be empirically observed.
For example, on page 14 of the article I linked to, he writes
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Audio Critic If a piece of electronics has flat frequency response, vanishingly small static and dynamic nonlinearities, a high enough input impedance and low enough output impedance, a noise level below audibility, and high enough channel separation, then it is not going to have a sound. ABX testing confirms this. That is not to say all amplifiers sound the same. Clearly an amplifier can have insufficient voltage- and current-drive capabilities for a given loudspeaker and that is going to be audible. Our test regime is designed to identify wimpy amplifiers. Amplifiers are also going to sound different if they do not satisfy the above conditions. |