This quote doesn't sound too good:
"The two headphones are actually quite similar. The CX 980s look like they feature better construction and they had a slight edge in the audio tests, but not by enough to merit the price difference. We'd probably recommend sticking with the CX 300-IIs and saving the money, providing the CX 980s' sound doesn't totally blow you away."
This quote doesn't sound too good:
"The two headphones are actually quite similar. The CX 980s look like they feature better construction and they had a slight edge in the audio tests, but not by enough to merit the price difference. We'd probably recommend sticking with the CX 300-IIs and saving the money, providing the CX 980s' sound doesn't totally blow you away."
Yeah, can't really compare earbuds and canalphones, especially since dollar-for-dollar Sennheiser's entry-level buds have always been a much better value than their lower-end canalphones in my opinion.
The MM 50 iPs are great headphones with a great price. It's hard to beat them in terms of value. What's more, the SE530s actually didn't best them in terms of audio quality. If you have a strong desire to pick up the SE530s, be it for their fit or for their extras, be our guest; for the majority of buyers, however, the MM 50 iPs would probably be the better choice.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.