tayano
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Jan 23, 2005
- Posts
- 378
- Likes
- 28
I'm thinking of selling my um2 and try the new e4.
I know that e4 has less bass,slightly forward in the midrange and great highs,more detalied overal.
Um2 offer great bass,good mids and highs that need to be EQued.
I only use um2 with biflangels and EQ otherwise they are too bassy.
Many people prefer e4 to er-4,e5c and um2 and that's why I want to try them to.
I wonder if the soundstage of e4 is much smaller than um2/e5c?
I not to concern of e4's lackage of bass since I can EQ them and I think that they are easy to EQ like the other shures,right ?
I know that e4 has less bass,slightly forward in the midrange and great highs,more detalied overal.
Um2 offer great bass,good mids and highs that need to be EQued.
I only use um2 with biflangels and EQ otherwise they are too bassy.
Many people prefer e4 to er-4,e5c and um2 and that's why I want to try them to.
I wonder if the soundstage of e4 is much smaller than um2/e5c?
I not to concern of e4's lackage of bass since I can EQ them and I think that they are easy to EQ like the other shures,right ?