I don't think that anyone is saying that all composers that start with B are the best. But with Bach and Beethoven, the B's are going to win any argument on that score.
I don't think that anyone is saying that all composers that start with B are the best. But with Bach and Beethoven, the B's are going to win any argument on that score.
I agree with you. Only real quibble is the missed opportunity to really have "perfect music forever."
Maybe we can start making the RedBook replacement "perfect music perfectly forever" with a sample rate of 50-60KHz, that's what I would have done . Could be this is why DSD sounds so much better...?
I want to be clear about one thing, that I highly value well-recorded and well-engineered musical recordings, and I highly value accurate, detailed, and un-colored audio equipment with transparent sound. If everything is "perfect" up to about 6-8 kHz, but not audible above that frequency, what I am saying is that it doesn't usually make as much difference as most people think, at least for most music. Obviously, audiophiles tend to focus on "demo" or "evaluation" tracks that may have some sound above 6-8 kHz, but that is usually the main criteria that I use when choosing music to listen to.
I have to let my Credit Card cool down a bit before getting a MM2.
It will be about $487 Canadian after exchange, FedEx, taxes, "brokerage".
I know it is worth it, but for comparison sake I can get HiFiman Edition XS for $505 Canadian no tax or brokerage on Aliexpress. I already got a great deal on some Grado RS2X locally instead, but you can see what I mean.
We were only talking about classical composers. But with regard to the Beatles, credit goes to the individual composer(s) of each song, not the group (Lennon, McCartney, Lennon and McCartney, etc.). There may be a few Beatle songs where all four got credit, I don't recall.
We were only talking about classical composers. But with regard to the Beatles, credit goes to the individual composer(s) of each song, not the group (Lennon, McCartney, Lennon and McCartney, etc.). There may be a few Beatle songs where all four got credit, I don't recall.
I ordered a DAC this morning but needed balanced output in a black case, so Bifrost it was.
I really struggled with springing for the OG Yiggy on close out, but in the end the cost difference will pay for an Urd, so they’ll be getting the money soon enough.
I want to be clear about one thing, that I highly value well-recorded and well-engineered musical recordings, and I highly value accurate, detailed, and un-colored audio equipment with transparent sound. If everything is "perfect" up to about 6-8 kHz, but not audible above that frequency, what I am saying is that it doesn't usually make as much difference as most people think, at least for most music. Obviously, audiophiles tend to focus on "demo" or "evaluation" tracks that may have some sound above 6-8 kHz, but that is usually the main criteria that I use when choosing music to listen to.
Would it be safe to say that a great many instruments are often somewhat "masked" by their louder neighbors in the orchestra? This was one of the theories behind MiniDisc and DCC recordings, or so I recall. I liked both formats fine but then I can be something of a philistine.
I have to let my Credit Card cool down a bit before getting a MM2.
It will be about $487 Canadian after exchange, FedEx, taxes, "brokerage".
I know it is worth it, but for comparison sake I can get HiFiman Edition XS for $505 Canadian no tax or brokerage on Aliexpress. I already got a great deal on some Grado RS2X locally instead, but you can see what I mean.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.