kstuart
1000+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Dec 11, 2011
- Posts
- 1,281
- Likes
- 308
Author's precis: Mike Moffat will certainly cover this in his own blog, but he's still got a few decades of catching up with the present to do...so, until then, you have my perspective on the Bifrost Multibit.
[size=small]2015, Chapter 17: [/size]
The Multibit Revolution Gets Cheap
[...]
Plus, going discrete in the Bifrost Multibit was completely different than our other DACs:
- The discrete stage in the Yggdrasil and GMB are both just buffers. The DACs used there have voltage output. So, they are very simple discrete stages, just four active devices per channel. However, as measurements clearly show, this simplicity does not compromise distortion performance (this is usually the penalty paid...simple discrete amps typically have high THD.) That's why when you see some "2-PPM wonder amp" it usually has about 80 active devices per channel. We can argue till the cows come home which sounds better.
- The discrete stage in the standard Bifrost and Gungnir is actually a small amp stage—not exactly a discrete op-amp, due to its very specific gain structure and open-loop bandwidth beyond the audio band--but it also takes a voltage output of the DAC, amplifies it a bit, and passes it on. No I/V necessary.
- The AD5547 is a multiplying DAC, which means it needs two very well-matched gain stages for exceptional accuracy, not just a single I/V converter. Which means it would need twice the circuitry. Fully discrete? As I mentioned, aha, no.
So…even with surface mount components, the math was simple. It all pointed to “nope, sorry, divide by zero, sums to nothin, system is unstable, ain’t gonna work around here.” Anyone looking for a comparison to a mythical discrete-output board for Bifrost Multibit will be disappointed…because we simply never tried to do it.*
*And no, there is no conspiracy where we’re holding back a better analog board that will magically appear in 6-8 months, when sales start slowing down in the spring.**
**Now, that doesn’t say we’ll never have a better analog board for Bifrost. Hell, it’s possible that even better multibit DACs will be available in the future. Or a new delta-sigma technology will force Mike to recant and go 100% pro-DSD. Though the third sentence is, I think, about as likely as a meteor hitting me on the head before I finish this current sentence.***
***And, sentence finished. There you go.
[...]
Jason - Thanks for that description of some of the thought processes behind the design decisions for the Multibit Bifrost.
There was one more detail of interest, which I am hoping you can shed some light on. The specs page says:
Analog Stage: precision I/V converter and output buffer based on AD8512
Can you talk about the decision to use the AD8512 ? Did you consider any other op-amps ? Or were there some electrical reasons why that part would be the right one ?
Thanks.
PS I am continuing to enjoy the Multibit Bifrost. BTW, several of us in this thread are of the opinion that it gets "smoother" after being turned on for several days. In fact, the one marketing problem with the Multibit BIfrost is that it is so transparent, that it is not dramatic or exciting. With the average poorly recorded album, it does not "sound great", it just gets out of the way of the music. It takes a spectacular recording like the Reiner Scheherazade to make people notice the excellent sound quality.