Bonehead7171
100+ Head-Fier
I agree! And I think it was your post that alerted me to this option, so Thank You!These just arrived from China. Ordered 4/19 received 5/3. The $10.00 to ship with AliExpress was probably well worth it.
![]()
I agree! And I think it was your post that alerted me to this option, so Thank You!These just arrived from China. Ordered 4/19 received 5/3. The $10.00 to ship with AliExpress was probably well worth it.
![]()
Excellent! Psvane makes very nice tubes.These just arrived from China. Ordered 4/19 received 5/3. The $10.00 to ship with AliExpress was probably well worth it.
![]()
My PSVane EL34-B tubes are very musical in my Acrosound transformer amplifier, especially as compared to Electro Harmoix 6CA7EH tubes, which are rather flat in character.Excellent! Psvane makes very nice tubes.
There are amps that use both.EL34 is not compatible with 6SN7, correct?
EL34 is not compatible with 6SN7, correct?
Oops I misunderstood the question lol, you cannot replace one with the other directly that I know of. Both types of tubes can be used in the same amp but for different purposes.As far as I know they are not interchangeable. Not like say 6SN7 and 6SL7, although I believe the gain of the 6SL7 is much higher than 6SN7.
.
Most definitely not.EL34 is notcompatibleinterchangeable with 6SN7, correct?
True. As a matter of fact that is exactly what is used in the RAAL VM-1a. Initial production of that amp was designed using the 6SL7 as a driver 2 EL34'sper channel for power output, and an additional EL-34 per channel to provide the additional current boost ribbons need, apparently lots o' watts isn't as critical as current with their ribbons.There are amps that use both.
6sn and 6sl tubes have the same pin-out and heater specs, but then things diverge in the gain and plate resistance arena. In many cases you can plug a 6sl into a 6sn circuit, but be aware that 1) the bias is incorrect 2) the plate load is incorrect 3) yes, you will get sound out, but distortion and linearity are compromised. Remember, the guy that designed your amp selected 6sn for a reason. BTW, the early Williamson amps used a 6SL7 followed by a 6SN7, while later version redesigned the input amp to be a 6SN7.Oops I misunderstood the question lol, you cannot replace one with the other directly that I know of. Both types of tubes can be used in the same amp but for different purposes.
I am a lover of psychedelic rock (both classic and modern), but one band I've given up on is King Gizzard & The Lizard Wizard. The reason is their love of a lo-fi aesthetic in production that makes listening to their albums very disappointing on even my relatively modest audiophile setup. I sometimes think they're tuning their recordings to sound good on Bluetooth speakers or something. It's a shame, because they are a supremely talented band, but they do themselves and their current/future fans a disservice by deliberately going for a schiity sound. Especially nowadays when you can get better sound quality than DSOTM relatively cheaply.Sorry, guys, but I've gotta let off some steam for a second…
Black Stone Cherry - Kentucky
That's just one of those albums that really drive me up the wall. Some of the best southern/hard rock guitar work out there, especially on the track The Way of the Future. But no matter what source you listen to, the tracks all sound like complete swamp ass. 24bit / 96k on both, iTunes and Qobuz, but from both sources, the whole album sounds like a 128kbit/s MP3. Especially during the more powerful passages, the tracks all collapse into a noisy mess of compression artifacts. Particularly the high hats and crashes turn utterly unbearable.
The Pretty Reckless has a very similar problem. The older two albums were ok-ish, but Going to Hell and Death by Rock And Roll are unlistenable.
In fact, this seems to be a relatively prevailing issue throughout most of hard rock, southern rock, and metal. Pick a band from those genres, any band, and chances are that the mix sounds like some crappy Napster rip.
I honestly wonder why that is.
OK, done. Back to our regularly scheduled sine wave.![]()
Sorry, guys, but I've gotta let off some steam for a second…
Black Stone Cherry - Kentucky
That's just one of those albums that really drive me up the wall. Some of the best southern/hard rock guitar work out there, especially on the track The Way of the Future. But no matter what source you listen to, the tracks all sound like complete swamp ass. 24bit / 96k on both, iTunes and Qobuz, but from both sources, the whole album sounds like a 128kbit/s MP3. Especially during the more powerful passages, the tracks all collapse into a noisy mess of compression artifacts. Particularly the high hats and crashes turn utterly unbearable.
The Pretty Reckless has a very similar problem. The older two albums were ok-ish, but Going to Hell and Death by Rock And Roll are unlistenable.
In fact, this seems to be a relatively prevailing issue throughout most of hard rock, southern rock, and metal. Pick a band from those genres, any band, and chances are that the mix sounds like some crappy Napster rip.
I honestly wonder why that is.
OK, done. Back to our regularly scheduled sine wave.
Edit:
Oh, and to also post something much more positive to keep things balanced:
"California" by Bahari; I'll never be able to listen to that song and not grin like an idiot. Don't even know why, it just makes me happy.![]()