unique_loy
Head-Fier
- Joined
- Apr 27, 2008
- Posts
- 71
- Likes
- 0
I ordered a Predator,b4 this,I've sold my hornet. I have to say: predator>>hornet
Originally Posted by unique_loy /img/forum/go_quote.gif I love tomahawk only,for its amazing bettary life ![]() |
Originally Posted by tnmike1 /img/forum/go_quote.gif x2 for that opinion. PLUS the tomahawk doesn't take 800-1000 hrs to fully burn in, something to consider. Personally, I use my amps about 2-3 hrs per day and at that rate, it would take tons of days for the Predator to totally blossom. |
Originally Posted by wolfen68 /img/forum/go_quote.gif I like all of Ray's amps, and have heard all of the portables except the Tomahawk. With that said, I can see how people like the Predator..but if you don't need the DAC, I can't say it's worth all of the extra money as an amp alone over a clean used Hornet M. Hornet's can be had used for $230-250, half the price of a Predator. |
Originally Posted by robojack /img/forum/go_quote.gif ....the Predator's pretty much equal to (or better in some cases) an SR-71 amp. |
Originally Posted by robojack /img/forum/go_quote.gif If you think the Predator is just a Hornet with a DAC, you're mistaken. The Predator's amp is far more powerful, robust, and full sounding than the Hornet's, and doesn't contain the same shortcomings as its older sibling. From what I've heard from other people, the Predator's pretty much equal to (or better in some cases) an SR-71 amp. |