Mecc
Head-Fier
- Joined
- Aug 5, 2005
- Posts
- 87
- Likes
- 10
I also just got some new RS-1, buttonless model. My opinions are similar to the op. I ordered some flat pads because some people said that they prefer them vastly over the bowls, e.g., some guy from 6moons.
I'm also using Stello DA-100, except EF-1 as the amp. The RS-1 will be balanced eventually.
I noticed that you have to wear the earpads so that your earlobes are inside the bowl. It really puts you into the music, but it gets a bit uncomfortable (physically) after a while. The highs aren't that harsh for me, but its effect on certain recordings can be distracting. Hopefully it'll soften up with burn-in. The RS-1 are very engaging and the bass was quite a surprise for me. I'm used to hearing detail with a lean and/or cooler presentation. People said that the flat pads give the RS-1 more bass which isn't something I really wanted, but I think they tame the highs as well.
The GS1000 presents the lows, mids, and high in a similar fashion, but with a huge soundstage (mids are less engaging as a result), so I don't know why people say the GS1000 doesn't sound like a Grado. I tried the huge bowls on the RS-1, kinda weird, the sibilance (sss) was more pronounced. The sibilance on the GS1000 is more (chh, ji, and a variety of sounds). They might be the perfect headphones for me if they didn't exhibit those sounds. I tried the bowls on the GS1000 and what do you know, less sibilance, but the music sounded odd and the sound stage got zipped up.
The RS-1 sounds good with certain genres, but then they are too much for others. A bit odd perhaps, but I found some pop songs to be too engaging or overwhelming for me. Perhaps it has to do with the recording. I also noticed that pop songs sound better to me on lesser equipment compared to other genres. So, maybe this is the louder equalizer crap that's I'm hearing.
I'm also using Stello DA-100, except EF-1 as the amp. The RS-1 will be balanced eventually.
I noticed that you have to wear the earpads so that your earlobes are inside the bowl. It really puts you into the music, but it gets a bit uncomfortable (physically) after a while. The highs aren't that harsh for me, but its effect on certain recordings can be distracting. Hopefully it'll soften up with burn-in. The RS-1 are very engaging and the bass was quite a surprise for me. I'm used to hearing detail with a lean and/or cooler presentation. People said that the flat pads give the RS-1 more bass which isn't something I really wanted, but I think they tame the highs as well.
The GS1000 presents the lows, mids, and high in a similar fashion, but with a huge soundstage (mids are less engaging as a result), so I don't know why people say the GS1000 doesn't sound like a Grado. I tried the huge bowls on the RS-1, kinda weird, the sibilance (sss) was more pronounced. The sibilance on the GS1000 is more (chh, ji, and a variety of sounds). They might be the perfect headphones for me if they didn't exhibit those sounds. I tried the bowls on the GS1000 and what do you know, less sibilance, but the music sounded odd and the sound stage got zipped up.
The RS-1 sounds good with certain genres, but then they are too much for others. A bit odd perhaps, but I found some pop songs to be too engaging or overwhelming for me. Perhaps it has to do with the recording. I also noticed that pop songs sound better to me on lesser equipment compared to other genres. So, maybe this is the louder equalizer crap that's I'm hearing.