[o0genesis0o]

Hey you are that guy who review IEM on medium I think I read your review of Helios.

keeping my lexicon internally consistent between reviews is very important to me

I like that sentence. I also try to do the same thing with my reviews.

I find that many audio reviews obfuscate as much as they illuminate. My goal is to be clear. I try to avoid flowery verbiage and describe what I hear as plainly and concisely as I can

Totally agree. In fact that’s one of the reasons why I start reviewing as well (another reason is that a reviewer told me if I disagree with their opinion so much, write my own )

If you don’t mind me asking, logistically, how do you manage to review so many IEMs?

 

[darmanastartes]

Hey you are that guy who review IEM on medium I think I read your review of Helios.



I like that sentence. I also try to do the same thing with my reviews.



Totally agree. In fact that’s one of the reasons why I start reviewing as well (another reason is that a reviewer told me if I disagree with their opinion so much, write my own )

If you don’t mind me asking, logistically, how do you manage to review so many IEMs?

I appreciate the support!
Keeping up with reviews while working a full-time job and a part-time grad school courseload is a challenge.
One thing I do is for the two weeks minimum I give myself to establish a baseline with a given IEM, I rarely use any other IEMs, if at all. Isolating myself from other IEMs until I'm actually sitting down to write helps strengthen that baseline. It makes drawing clear contrasts with my reference IEMs easier.
Another thing I do is keep a regular writing schedule. I have a specific time of the week blocked off for writing reviews. While the day I actually get to publishing my impressions may vary, the writing itself is nearly always done on Saturday morning.

 

[o0genesis0o]

Another thing I do is keep a regular writing schedule. I have a specific time of the week blocked off for writing reviews. While the day I actually get to publishing my impressions may vary, the writing itself is nearly always done on Saturday morning.

Good advice! I should do that too. I try to write gradually throughout the week, but one way or another, the writing rarely gets done. Keep up the good work and good luck with the grad school!

 

[darmanastartes]

Letshuoer D13 Review​

INTRODUCTION AND DISCLAIMER:​

The Letshuoer D13 is an in-ear monitor (IEM) which uses a 13mm diamond-like carbon dynamic driver. The D13 also features two different sets of swappable tuning nozzles. The D13 retails for $113 at HiFiGo, which sent me a unit in exchange for my impressions.

SOURCES:​

I have used the D13 with the following sources:

• Qudelix 5K
• Moondrop Dawn

PACKAGING AND ACCESSORIES:​

The Letshuoer D13 comes in a black cardboard box with a black slipcover. The front of the slipcover features a picture of the D13. The rear of the slipcover features technical specifications for the D13 in what I believe are Mandarin, Cantonese, English, and Japanese. Letshuoer’s corporate contact information is also listed on the back of the slipcover.
The D13 uses a detachable 2-pin cable. My review unit came with a 4.4mm balanced cable, but a 3.5mm single-ended cable is also available.
The D13 includes a faux-leather black zippered semi-rigid carry case with embossed Letshuoer branding and an internal mesh pocket.
The D13 includes two sets of silicone eartips (S, M, L). The clear-and-black set of eartips is shorter and wider in shape than the all-black set.
In terms of documentation, the D13 includes a manual, a warranty registration card, a product catalog, a quality control pass chit, and a card featuring quick response codes that link to Letshuoer’s social media profiles.

BUILD QUALITY AND DESIGN:​

The Letshuoer D13 has aluminum alloy housings with a rounded form factor reminiscent of Dunu’s DK series IEMs. The faceplate features a single slim arc-shaped vent and three arc-shaped recessions radiating outwards in a half-circle arrangement. The recessed arcs are filled in with bright yellow paint, which would not have been my first choice to pair with the metallic cobalt housings. “LETSHOUER D13-XXX” is printed in white on the back face of both the left and right housings, where “XXX” is the unit serial number.
There are circular resin plugs on the inner face of the 2-pin connector housing which are embossed with “L” and “R” indicators. The plugs are flush with the surface of the housing. The left side plug is blue and the right side plug is red, matching the resin endcaps of the included 2-pin cable. This is a subtle but impressive example of attention to detail in the D13’s design.
There are three small round vents on the inner face of the housing at the base of the nozzle. The nozzles are forward-swept and feature extruded lips for eartip retention. The two sets of tuning nozzles are distinguished by differently colored mesh covers.
The included 2-pin cable is wrapped in a quad-braid below the Y-split and double-helix patterns above the Y-split. The wire used in the cable’s construction is gorgeous and evokes a comparison to expensive aftermarket cables.
The cable jack has a straight form factor. There is a knurled band on the jack. “LETSHUOER” is printed in white towards the top of the jack housing. There is strain relief above the jack housing but none at the Y-split. The cable has pre-formed earguides without memory wire and an acrylic chin-adjustment choker. The cable microphonics are minor to non-existent even without the use of the choker.

COMFORT, FIT, AND ISOLATION:​

The Letshouer D13 is intended to be worn cable-up. The earpieces have a moderate insertion depth. I found the D13 to be exceptionally comfortable. Secureness of fit is average and the housings required occasional readjustment. I did not experience any driver flex with the D13. Isolation is very poor.

MEASUREMENTS:​

My measurements of the Letshuoer D13 can be found on my expanding squig.link database:
Letshuoer D13 (Silver) — Squiglink by Bedrock Reviews
Letshuoer D13 (Gold) — Squiglink by Bedrock Reviews

SOUND:​

The following sound impressions were taken with the silver nozzle filters.
The Letshuoer D13 has a U-shaped sound signature.
The D13’s bass tuning is highly reminiscent of the Moondrop Aria. Like the Aria, the D13’s bass is most elevated in the sub-bass region and gently decreases in emphasis all the way through the mid-bass region. The D13’s bass is clean and clear-sounding while retaining some mid-bass presence. There are moderate amounts of rumble and impact. Sub-bass extension is very good. Bass texture and detail retrieval are above average for the D13’s price point. I did find myself wanting more bass from the D13. Thankfully, the driver is highly capable and responds well to equalization (EQ).
The D13’s lower midrange is quite recessed. Some midrange instrumentation, such as analog percussion and electric guitars, can come across as a bit thin-sounding as a result. The D13’s pinna gain region is centered just past 2 kHz, which is earlier than I prefer. While not sibilant, both male and female vocals are overly forward and somewhat shouty to my ears. Harsh male vocals are appropriately abrasive and surprisingly intelligible. Female vocals sound realistic if overemphasized. The presence region is well-controlled and overall midrange clarity is excellent. Midrange timbre is very natural-sounding.
The D13 has a prominent lower treble peak. Treble-sensitive listeners may want to consider using foam eartips to dampen this peak, though will come at a cost to upper treble extension. Detail retrieval is average. Treble transient delivery is realistic and not overly splashy. Upper treble extension is fair. Interestingly, the D13 has a more natural-sounding timbre than the Moondrop Aria. The Aria, while having slightly superior detail retrieval, seems to have an overabundance of upper treble, which creates an artificial-sounding sheen. The D13’s soundstage and imaging are average. Instrument separation is slightly above average.

AMPLIFICATION REQUIREMENTS AND SOURCE PAIRING:​

The Letshuoer D13 is easy to drive. I did not notice hiss with either of my devices.

CLOSING WORDS:​

The Letshuoer D13 is a respectable offering at its price point but does little to stand out from the array of comparably priced and similarly competent IEMs on the market today. Bassheads comfortable with EQ and sticklers for timbre may want to take a closer look.
The Letshuoer D13 can be purchased below:
LETSHUOER D13-Custom 13mm DLC Diaphragm Dynamic Driver In-Ear Earphone — HiFiGo

 

[darmanastartes]

7Hz x Crinacle Salnotes Dioko Review​

INTRODUCTION AND DISCLAIMER:​

The 7Hz Salnotes Dioko is an in-ear monitor (IEM) which uses a 14.6mm planar-magnetic driver. 7Hz created the Dioko in collaboration with Crinacle. Please refer to my previous disclaimer addressing my reviews of Crinacle collaborations. The Dioko retails for $99 on Linsoul’s Amazon shop. Linsoul sent me a unit in exchange for my impressions.

SOURCES:​

I have used the 7Hz Salnotes Dioko with the following sources:

• Qudelix 5K
• Hidizs S9
• E1DA 9038D

PACKAGING AND ACCESSORIES:​

The 7Hz Salnotes Dioko comes in a white cardboard box. The packaging features pictures of the Dioko and lists 7Hz’s corporate address on the back of the box. There is also a large sticker on the side of the box highlighting the collaboration between 7Hz and Crinacle.
Inside the cardboard box is a large zippered carry case which takes up the entire volume of the box. The exterior of the carry case is covered in black synthetic leather and has a red “7” emblazoned across the top lid. The stitching is also red. “SAL♪NOTES” is inlaid in gold text near the bottom of the lid. The bottom of the case is lined with felt and features dedicated cutouts for the IEM housings and cable. The case also has a large mesh pocket on the top lid for storing accessories. The case is exceptional in terms of build quality, especially for the price point. However, the sheer size is excessive and requires the use of a sling or backpack if you intend to bring it with you on your commute.
In addition to the IEMs and detachable 2-pin cable, the Dioko includes seven pairs of silicone eartips in several varieties. The dark grey pair with red cores feels similar to AZLA SednaEarfit Crystal eartips. This pair aggravates my ears less than other non-foam eartips. The red, blue, and orange pairs are squatter and more conical in shape and feature wider nozzles. The light blue and yellow eartips are more round with narrower nozzles. The pink pair is also round but with wider nozzles than the other round eartips. The Dioko includes a product information card and a user manual written in English and Chinese.

BUILD QUALITY AND DESIGN:​

The 7Hz Salnotes Dioko has large aluminum housings with purple tempered glass faceplates. The faceplates have an ovular cross-section. “SAL♪NOTES DIOKO” is printed in white at the bottom of each faceplate. There is one circular vent at the base of the nozzle and three more in a line along the outer circumference of the inner housing. “L” and “R” indicators are printed in white on the inner faces of the housings. The nozzles have metal and paper nozzle covers and extruded lips to secure eartips.
The included 2-pin cable is wrapped in a quad-braid below the Y-split and double-helix patterns above the Y-split. Like the cable included with the Letshuoer D13 I recently reviewed, the wire used in the cable’s construction punches above the Dioko’s price point.
The cable uses gunmetal aluminum hardware. The cable jack has a straight form factor. “SAL♪NOTES” is printed in white along the length of the jack housing. There is strain relief above the jack housing but none at the Y-split. The cable has pre-formed earguides without memory wire and a metal chin-adjustment choker. The 2-pin connectors fit flush with the surface of the IEM housing body. The curved 2-pin housings have faintly raised “L” and “R” markings. The cable is moderately microphonic.

COMFORT, FIT, AND ISOLATION:​

The 7Hz Salnotes Dioko is intended to be worn cable-up. The earpieces have a very shallow insertion depth. I found the Dioko to be very comfortable. However, secureness of fit is very poor and the housings required frequent readjustment. I had to use the Dioko with the largest Misodiko foam tips I own in order to minimize the housings’ tendency to migrate out of my ear canals. Isolation is also quite poor.

MEASUREMENTS:​

My measurements of the 7Hz Salnotes Dioko can be found on my expanding squig.link database:
7Hz Dioko — Squiglink by Bedrock Reviews

SOUND:​

The 7Hz Salnotes Dioko features a sub-bass boost concentrated entirely below 200 Hz, a midrange tuned to Crinacle’s IEF Netural target, and an extended treble response with a distinct lower treble peak at 8 kHz as well as a noticeable upper treble boost.
The Dioko’s bass is fast, cleanly articulated, and adequately textured, but lacking in sustain and impact. As a result, the bass is somewhat limp in its delivery. There is also less rumble than the Dioko’s frequency response plot would suggest. On the other hand, bass detail retrieval is very good.
The Dioko’s lower midrange is slightly recessed and the overall midrange timbre is on the thin side. I would prefer if male vocals had a bit more body and warmth. The Dioko’s pinna gain region is correctly centered for my preferences, between 2.5 and 3 kHz. There is less pinna gain than I generally prefer, but it works well with the Dioko’s overall tuning. There is not as much separation between vocals and midrange instrumentation as the average Harman-ish IEM, but neither do vocals overshadow midrange instrumentation, as is often the case with such tunings. Vocal intelligibility for both male and female vocals is still excellent despite the restrained amount of pinna gain. The presence region is just emphasized enough to deliver an impressive amount of midrange clarity without straying into harshness or sibilance. Aggressive male vocals could use a bit more bite, but I am happy with the level of presence overall.
Like a lot of other planar-magnetic IEMs released in the last year, the Dioko has a prominent lower treble peak around 8 kHz. While this peak generally did not bother me, this is not an IEM for the treble-sensitive. Overall detail retrieval is excellent. The Dioko’s treble transient delivery is also more realistic than the significantly more expensive Raptgo Hook-X. Upper treble extension is spectacular for the price point, but this region is overemphasized relative to the rest of the Dioko’s frequency response. This creates an artificial-sounding sheen over the rest of the sonic presentation. The Dioko’s soundstage extends just slightly outside of the head. Imaging is very good, and instrument separation is excellent.

AMPLIFICATION REQUIREMENTS AND SOURCE PAIRING:​

The 7Hz Salnotes Dioko needs a moderately powerful source to achieve usable volume levels. I did not notice hiss with any of my devices.

CLOSING WORDS:​

While I take issue with certain aspects of its tuning, from a technical standpoint, the 7Hz Salnotes Dioko is better than any other IEM that I can think of at the $100 dollar price point. For me, the biggest issue with the Dioko is the shallow and insecure fit. My recommendation comes with a warning that buyers should prepare to tip-roll extensively.
The 7Hz Salnotes Dioko can be purchased below:
Amazon.com: 7Hz x Crinacle Salnotes Dioko HiFi 14.6mm Planar Diaphragm Driver in Ear Earphone IEMs with CNC Aviation-Grade Aluminum Case, Detachable 4-Core Litz OCC Copper Cable for Audiophile Musician Studio : Electronics

 

[darmanastartes]

7Hz Salnotes Zero Review​

INTRODUCTION AND DISCLAIMER:​

The 7Hz Salnotes Zero is an in-ear monitor (IEM) which uses a 10mm dynamic driver. The Zero retails for $20 on Linsoul’s Amazon shop. Linsoul sent me a unit in exchange for my impressions.

SOURCES:​

I have used the 7Hz Salnotes Zero with the following sources:

• Qudelix 5K
• Hidizs S9
• E1DA 9038D

PACKAGING AND ACCESSORIES:​

The 7Hz Salnotes Zero comes in a small white cardboard box. The packaging features pictures of the Zero on the front and back covers.

In addition to the IEMs and detachable 2-pin cable, the Zero includes six pairs of silicone eartips in several varieties. These appear to be the same varieties described in my Dioko review:

The red, blue, and orange pairs are squatter and more conical in shape and feature wider nozzles. The light blue and yellow eartips are more round with narrower nozzles. The pink pair is also round but with wider nozzles than the other round eartips.

The pair of eartips resembling AZLA SednaEarfit Crystal eartips included with the Dioko is not included with the Zero. The Zero includes a product information card and a user manual written in English and Chinese, as well as a small velcro tie. The Zero does not include a carry pouch or case.

BUILD QUALITY AND DESIGN:​

The 7Hz Salnotes Zero has a two-part plastic chassis with a stainless steel faceplate. The faceplates have a jagged, angular outline. “SAL♪NOTES ZERO” is laser-etched at the base of each faceplate. There is a small circular rivet at the top of each faceplate. The faceplates have developed minor scratches over the course of my review.

There is a small circular recession on the inside of each chassis with an embossed “L” or “R” indicator. There is also a pinprick vent at the base of the nozzle. The nozzles have the same metal and paper nozzle covers as the Dioko, and have extruded lips to secure eartips.

The 2-pin connectors are very snug and quite difficult to remove. The 2-pin connectors fit flush with the surface of the IEM housing body. Each 2-pin entry site is marked with a small red dot to indicate polarity.

The included 2-pin cable has two strands that are joined in parallel below the Y-split. The cable uses a mix of metal and dark plastic hardware. The cable jack has a straight form factor. “SAL♪NOTES” is printed in white along the length of the jack housing. There is strain relief above the jack housing but none at the Y-split. The cable has pre-formed earguides without memory wire and a rubber chin-adjustment choker. The curved 2-pin housings have faintly raised “L” and “R” markings. The cable is mildly microphonic.

COMFORT, FIT, AND ISOLATION:​

The 7Hz Salnotes Zero is intended to be worn cable-up. The earpieces have a shallow insertion depth. I found the Zero to be very comfortable. However, secureness of fit is below average and the housings required occasional readjustment with most eartips I tried the Zero with. Isolation is fairly poor. There is mild driver flex.

MEASUREMENTS:​

My measurements of the 7Hz Salnotes Zero can be found on my expanding squig.link database:

7Hz Zero — Squiglink by Bedrock Reviews

SOUND AND COMPARISON TO THE MOONDROP CHU:​

The 7Hz Salnotes Zero is tuned very similarly to the Moondrop Chu.

Like the Chu, the Zero has a Harman-ish sound that emphasizes sub-bass over mid-bass, features a robust pinna gain region, and slopes downward from the pinna gain region through the upper treble.

The biggest tonal difference between the Chu and the Zero is that the Zero’s pinna gain region peaks later than the Chu. The Chu’s pinna gain region is centered around 3 kHz, while the Zero’s peaks later at around 3.5 kHz. This is a subtle difference, but depending on your ear physiology, may impact which of the two IEMs vocals sound more natural with. The Zero has a twinge more measured sub-bass than the Chu, although the difference between my samples is so small that this may be a question of unit variation rather than intended tuning. Subjectively, I feel that percussion actually has a greater impact on the Chu than the Zero. The Chu also has a hair more upper treble extension than the Zero.

The Zero’s sub-bass shelf is mild in its amplitude, and sub-bass extension is average. Bass articulation and resolution are both very good. The Zero’s bass is well-textured for the price but is lacking in impact. The result is a clean but underwhelming bass tuning. After hearing the Chu and now the Zero, I have come to believe that if an IEM opts for a pure sub-bass shelf, the amplitude of that shelf needs to be greater than what either of these IEMs displays. The bass does not bleed into the lower mids.

The Zero’s midrange is on the cooler side. Male vocals have grit but are slightly lacking in warmth. The amount of body to male vocals is somewhere in between these two other qualities. Female vocals are slightly more forward than male vocals, though both are very intelligible. Female vocals do sound more natural on the Chu than the Zero. On the Zero, there is a hint of strain and sibilance. On the Chu, female vocals are just slightly more grounded. With that said, the Zero’s midrange clarity is astonishing for an IEM of this price. The level of presence is essentially perfect for heavy rock genres. Timbre is slightly dry but natural sounding overall.

The Zero has slightly less lower treble energy than the Chu, which I prefer. Like the Chu, the Zero has a noticeable drop-off in the mid-treble which deprives cymbal hits of sparkle. While the Chu has better upper treble extension than the Zero, the Zero has slightly crisper treble transient delivery. The Chu has a larger soundstage and slightly better detail retrieval. Imaging between the two is comparable. The Zero has the best instrument separation I have heard on an IEM at this price.

AMPLIFICATION REQUIREMENTS AND SOURCE PAIRING:​

The 7Hz Salnotes Zero does not need a powerful source to reach a usable listening volume. I did not notice hiss with any of my devices.

CLOSING WORDS:​

Overall, the 7Hz Salnotes Zero and the Moondrop Chu are neck-and-neck in terms of sound quality. They each have certain strengths and weaknesses compared to the other, but both put other options at the price point to shame. The two IEMs also make different trade-offs in terms of build and accessories. With the Zero, you get a detachable cable, whereas, with the Chu, you get Spring tips. While buyers will need to weigh which characteristics they value more in choosing between the two, both are solid buys for $20.

The 7Hz Salnotes Zero can be purchased below:

Amazon.com: Linsoul 7Hz Salnotes Zero HiFi 10mm Dynamic Driver in-Ear Earphone IEM with Metal Composite Diaphragm Stainless Steel Faceplate Detachable 2Pin OFC Cable (White) : Electronics

 

[darmanastartes]

Moondrop Stellaris Review​

INTRODUCTION AND DISCLAIMER:​

The Moondrop Stellaris is an in-ear monitor (IEM) which uses a 14.5mm planar-magnetic driver. The Stellaris retails for $109 at ShenzhenAudio, which sent me a unit in exchange for my impressions.

SOURCES:​

I have used the Moondrop Stellaris with the following sources:

• Qudelix 5K
• Hidizs S9
• E1DA 9038D
• Xumee USB-C to 3.5mm Audio Adapter

PACKAGING AND ACCESSORIES:​

The Moondrop Stellaris comes in a large square black cardboard box with a white slipcover. The slipcover features an anime waifu on the front cover and an exploded diagram of the Stellaris on the rear cover. The rear cover also provides a frequency response graph for the Stellaris, technical specifications for the Stellaris in English and Chinese, and Moondrop’s corporate address.
The box has three compartments. The first compartment holds the IEMs in a removable foam tray. The second compartment holds the included carry case. The third compartment holds a smaller rectangular box. This box contains the included eartips, a translucent zip-lock bag in which the included 2-pin cable is stored, and several pieces of paper documentation.

The Stellaris includes three pairs of Misodiko foam eartips (S, M, L) and three pairs of what appears to be Moondrop’s take on a thermoplastic elastomer (TPE) eartip (S, M, L). The included case is similar in size and materials to the case included with the Moondrop Variations but uses a more traditional form factor, which is my preference. The flap of this case features a magnetic closure, which works well. In terms of documentation, the Stellaris includes a user manual, a postcard featuring another anime waifu illustration, a quality control pass chit, and a contact card featuring a scannable quick response code.

BUILD QUALITY AND DESIGN:​

The Moondrop Stellaris has metal housings with the same glittery blue glossy enamel finish as the Moondrop Starfield. The left faceplate is illustrated with a comet design, and the right faceplate features a sun and a crescent moon. The faceplates are secured via gold screws which feature three tiny circular divets. “STELLARIS” is printed on the back face of each the housing body just below the seam between the body and the faceplate. “L” and “R” indicators are printed above the base of the nozzle in line with the “S” in “STELLARIS.” All the text and designs on the faceplates and shell bodies are printed using gold paint.
There are small circular vents at the bases of the nozzles. The nozzles have substantial lips to secure eartips, which is a welcome change for Moondrop. The nozzles appear to be stuffed with black mesh a millimeter or two down the nozzle bore. The 2-pin connectors are slightly recessed.
The included 2-pin cable uses blue and gold wires wrapped in a transparent plastic sheath. The cable is not braided above or below the Y-split. The Y-split and jack hardware are made from hard dark blue rubber. The Y-split hardware is embossed with Moondrop branding. The cable jack has an L-shaped form factor. The cable features pre-formed earguides and a gold-colored metal chin-adjustment choker. There is strain relief above the jack housing but none at the Y-split. The 2-pin connectors have nearly invisible raised “L” and “R” markings. The cable is mildly microphonic.

COMFORT, FIT, AND ISOLATION:​

The Moondrop Stellaris is intended to be worn cable-up. The earpieces have a moderate to deep insertion depth. I found the Stellaris to be average in comfort. However, secureness of fit is below average because the large and heavy housings protrude substantially away from the ears. The housings required periodic readjustment using the included TPE eartips. Isolation is poor. There is no driver flex.

MEASUREMENTS:​

My measurements of the Moondrop Stellaris can be found on my expanding squig.link database:

Moondrop Stellaris — Squiglink by Bedrock Reviews

SOUND:​

The Moondrop Stellaris does not sound like any other Moondrop IEM I have reviewed, and this is not a positive distinction. Unfortunately, the tuning of the Stellaris reminds me of something TRN would release.

The bass region is most reminiscent of a conventional Moondrop IEM, featuring a moderately elevated sub-bass region that tapers off gently rather than abruptly. Subjectively, the Stellaris does not have as good sub-bass extension as its frequency response measurement would suggest. The bass response is lacking in weight and punchiness. Bass articulation and resolution are both excellent. Bass texture is middle of the road. The bass does not bleed into the lower mids.

The Stellaris has a strained, peaky midrange. Other reviewers have described the Stellaris as “shouty.” I do not feel that shouty is the correct adjective for the Stellaris’ midrange. I would instead use the term Head-Fi-er baskingshark used, “nasal.” Vocals, especially male vocals, seem compressed along the X-axis and have nowhere to go but up. The result is that male vocalists often sound as if they are battling a cold. Harsh male vocals lack body and warmth, while simultaneously sounding overly gritty. Female vocals are a little more realistic but still sound overemphasized and potentially sibilant. Vocals and midrange instrumentation are not well-integrated. Timbral accuracy is acceptable, as is the level of presence.

The Stellaris has an uneven treble response. There is a reasonable amount of lower treble which seems roughly in line with the presence region. However, this is followed by an audible mid-treble peak. This peak overemphasizes the trailing edge of cymbals and hi-hats and can make these kinds of percussion unpleasant to listen to. The Stellaris does have excellent upper treble extension and superb detail retrieval. Other types of technical performance such as soundstage size, imaging, and instrument separation are also excellent for the price point. These qualities are more easily appreciated if the Stellaris’ overall frequency response is massaged into coherency with equalization.

AMPLIFICATION REQUIREMENTS AND SOURCE PAIRING:​

The Moondrop Stellaris is quite difficult to drive and requires a moderately powerful source to reach a usable listening volume. I did not notice hiss with any of my devices.

CLOSING WORDS:​

The Moondrop Stellaris is a disappointing first entry by Moondrop into the planar-magnetic IEM space. This is an IEM that could have used more time in development and has unfortunately become a victim of the Chi-Fi industry’s breakneck rush to capitalize on a new driver type trend.

Below are my thoughts on why the Stellaris sounds the way that it does:

My suspicion is that Moondrop is using the same or a similar driver as everyone else and hasn’t figured out how to shift the center of the pinna gain peak too far away from 2.3 kHz using this driver, nor have they figured out how to avoid the tendency of this driver to narrowly peak at this frequency. As far as I know, 7Hz is the only manufacturer who’s managed to both shift the apex of that peak further down the frequency range and broaden it, as seen on the Dioko.
I don’t think the problem is the amount of pinna gain on its own. I think the problem is that Moondrop tried to give the Stellaris what on any other Moondrop IEM would be a reasonable amount of pinna gain without solving these driver limitations. Something like the Raptgo Hook-X works a lot better for me even though they haven’t solved these issues either because they adjusted the amount of pinna gain down substantially.

I do not recommend the Moondrop Stellaris.

The Moondrop Stellaris can be purchased below:

MOONDROP STELLARIS 14.5mm Planar IEMs SUB-Nanometer Diaphragm Dynamic (shenzhenaudio.com)

 

[jmwant]

Moondrop Stellaris Review​

INTRODUCTION AND DISCLAIMER:​

The Moondrop Stellaris is an in-ear monitor (IEM) which uses a 14.5mm planar-magnetic driver. The Stellaris retails for $109 at ShenzhenAudio, which sent me a unit in exchange for my impressions.

SOURCES:​

I have used the Moondrop Stellaris with the following sources:

• Qudelix 5K
• Hidizs S9
• E1DA 9038D
• Xumee USB-C to 3.5mm Audio Adapter

PACKAGING AND ACCESSORIES:​

The Moondrop Stellaris comes in a large square black cardboard box with a white slipcover. The slipcover features an anime waifu on the front cover and an exploded diagram of the Stellaris on the rear cover. The rear cover also provides a frequency response graph for the Stellaris, technical specifications for the Stellaris in English and Chinese, and Moondrop’s corporate address.
The box has three compartments. The first compartment holds the IEMs in a removable foam tray. The second compartment holds the included carry case. The third compartment holds a smaller rectangular box. This box contains the included eartips, a translucent zip-lock bag in which the included 2-pin cable is stored, and several pieces of paper documentation.

The Stellaris includes three pairs of Misodiko foam eartips (S, M, L) and three pairs of what appears to be Moondrop’s take on a thermoplastic elastomer (TPE) eartip (S, M, L). The included case is similar in size and materials to the case included with the Moondrop Variations but uses a more traditional form factor, which is my preference. The flap of this case features a magnetic closure, which works well. In terms of documentation, the Stellaris includes a user manual, a postcard featuring another anime waifu illustration, a quality control pass chit, and a contact card featuring a scannable quick response code.

BUILD QUALITY AND DESIGN:​

The Moondrop Stellaris has metal housings with the same glittery blue glossy enamel finish as the Moondrop Starfield. The left faceplate is illustrated with a comet design, and the right faceplate features a sun and a crescent moon. The faceplates are secured via gold screws which feature three tiny circular divets. “STELLARIS” is printed on the back face of each the housing body just below the seam between the body and the faceplate. “L” and “R” indicators are printed above the base of the nozzle in line with the “S” in “STELLARIS.” All the text and designs on the faceplates and shell bodies are printed using gold paint.
There are small circular vents at the bases of the nozzles. The nozzles have substantial lips to secure eartips, which is a welcome change for Moondrop. The nozzles appear to be stuffed with black mesh a millimeter or two down the nozzle bore. The 2-pin connectors are slightly recessed.
The included 2-pin cable uses blue and gold wires wrapped in a transparent plastic sheath. The cable is not braided above or below the Y-split. The Y-split and jack hardware are made from hard dark blue rubber. The Y-split hardware is embossed with Moondrop branding. The cable jack has an L-shaped form factor. The cable features pre-formed earguides and a gold-colored metal chin-adjustment choker. There is strain relief above the jack housing but none at the Y-split. The 2-pin connectors have nearly invisible raised “L” and “R” markings. The cable is mildly microphonic.

COMFORT, FIT, AND ISOLATION:​

The Moondrop Stellaris is intended to be worn cable-up. The earpieces have a moderate to deep insertion depth. I found the Stellaris to be average in comfort. However, secureness of fit is below average because the large and heavy housings protrude substantially away from the ears. The housings required periodic readjustment using the included TPE eartips. Isolation is poor. There is no driver flex.

MEASUREMENTS:​

My measurements of the Moondrop Stellaris can be found on my expanding squig.link database:

Moondrop Stellaris — Squiglink by Bedrock Reviews

SOUND:​

The Moondrop Stellaris does not sound like any other Moondrop IEM I have reviewed, and this is not a positive distinction. Unfortunately, the tuning of the Stellaris reminds me of something TRN would release.

The bass region is most reminiscent of a conventional Moondrop IEM, featuring a moderately elevated sub-bass region that tapers off gently rather than abruptly. Subjectively, the Stellaris does not have as good sub-bass extension as its frequency response measurement would suggest. The bass response is lacking in weight and punchiness. Bass articulation and resolution are both excellent. Bass texture is middle of the road. The bass does not bleed into the lower mids.

The Stellaris has a strained, peaky midrange. Other reviewers have described the Stellaris as “shouty.” I do not feel that shouty is the correct adjective for the Stellaris’ midrange. I would instead use the term Head-Fi-er baskingshark used, “nasal.” Vocals, especially male vocals, seem compressed along the X-axis and have nowhere to go but up. The result is that male vocalists often sound as if they are battling a cold. Harsh male vocals lack body and warmth, while simultaneously sounding overly gritty. Female vocals are a little more realistic but still sound overemphasized and potentially sibilant. Vocals and midrange instrumentation are not well-integrated. Timbral accuracy is acceptable, as is the level of presence.

The Stellaris has an uneven treble response. There is a reasonable amount of lower treble which seems roughly in line with the presence region. However, this is followed by an audible mid-treble peak. This peak overemphasizes the trailing edge of cymbals and hi-hats and can make these kinds of percussion unpleasant to listen to. The Stellaris does have excellent upper treble extension and superb detail retrieval. Other types of technical performance such as soundstage size, imaging, and instrument separation are also excellent for the price point. These qualities are more easily appreciated if the Stellaris’ overall frequency response is massaged into coherency with equalization.

AMPLIFICATION REQUIREMENTS AND SOURCE PAIRING:​

The Moondrop Stellaris is quite difficult to drive and requires a moderately powerful source to reach a usable listening volume. I did not notice hiss with any of my devices.

CLOSING WORDS:​

The Moondrop Stellaris is a disappointing first entry by Moondrop into the planar-magnetic IEM space. This is an IEM that could have used more time in development and has unfortunately become a victim of the Chi-Fi industry’s breakneck rush to capitalize on a new driver type trend.

Below are my thoughts on why the Stellaris sounds the way that it does:


I do not recommend the Moondrop Stellaris.

The Moondrop Stellaris can be purchased below:

MOONDROP STELLARIS 14.5mm Planar IEMs SUB-Nanometer Diaphragm Dynamic (shenzhenaudio.com)

It seems like the Stellaris has all the things I try to avoid in an IEM,lol. Thanks for the review.

 

[darmanastartes]

TinHiFi T2 DLC Review​

INTRODUCTION AND DISCLAIMER:​

The TinHiFi T2 DLC is a new revision of TinHiFi’s famed T2 in-ear monitor (IEM). The T2 DLC features a new 10mm dynamic driver with a diamond-like carbon diaphragm and adopts 2-pin connectors for the detachable cable interface. The T2 DLC retails for $52.51 directly from TinHiFi at the time of writing this review. TinHiFi sent me a unit in exchange for my impressions.

SOURCES:​

I have used the TinHiFi T2 DLC with the following sources:

• Qudelix 5K
• Hidizs S9

PACKAGING AND ACCESSORIES:​

The TinHiFi T2 DLC comes in a small rectangular black box. The TinHiFi logo and the text “T2” are printed on the top of the box in white. Inside the box is a second black-and-beige cardboard container designed to resemble a book. The top lid of this container features TinHiFi’s logo inlaid in silver. This “book” unfolds right-to-left, revealing the IEMs held in a foam mounting block. The included cable, accessories, and documentation are stored below this block.
The T2 DLC includes six pairs of silicone eartips (2xS, 2xM, 2xL) and one pair of the iconic teal TinHiFi foam eartips. A TinHiFi-branded velcro zip tie is also included. In terms of documentation, the T2 DLC includes a user manual and a contact card featuring scannable quick-response codes that link to TinHiFi’s Facebook and Twitter pages. The T2 DLC does not include a carry pouch or case.

BUILD QUALITY AND DESIGN:​

Apart from the switch from MMCX to 2-pin, the TinHiFi T2 DLC largely resembles its venerable predecessor. The IEM is composed of a three-part polished metal assemblage. The faceplate is circular in shape and is marked with the TinHiFi logo in light blue. The bottom of the outer section of each housing has a pinprick circular vent, as does the back face of the midsection. The nozzles have perforated metal nozzle covers and substantial lips to secure eartips. The 2-pin ports are flush fit into a circular base that matches the cable-side pin connector base in diameter. This base is marked with a dab of blue paint to indicate polarity. The base on the right-hand side IEM and the base of the 2-pin connector of the right-hand side cable are made of red plastic. The corresponding left-hand side bases are clear resin. The cable and IEM housings otherwise lack directional indicators.
The included 2-pin cable uses a complex eight-strand braid below the Y-split and twin quad-braids above the Y-split. The cable has strain relief above the straight 3.5mm jack and below the Y-split hardware. The cable hardware is polished metal without any branding. The 3.5mm jack hardware does feature two knurled bands. The cable features pre-formed earguides and a plastic bead chin-adjustment choker. The cable is mildly microphonic.

COMFORT, FIT, AND ISOLATION:​

The TinHiFi T2 DLC is intended to be worn cable-up. The earpieces have a moderate insertion depth. I found the T2 DLC to be average in comfort. Secureness of fit and isolation are above average. There is no driver flex.

MEASUREMENTS:​

My measurements of the TinHiFi T2 DLC can be found on my expanding squig.link database:
TinHiFi T2 DLC — Squiglink by Bedrock Reviews

SOUND:​

The TinHiFi T2 DLC has a Harman-ish tuning that strongly resembles the Moondrop Aria.
The T2 DLC features a sub-bass region that is more elevated than the mid-bass region, a comparatively recessed lower midrange, a broadly yet moderately elevated upper midrange, and a treble region that is slightly less emphasized than the upper midrange.
The T2 DLC’s sub-bass extension is above average but not exceptional. There is a satisfying amount of weight and impact to percussion. The speed of bass articulation is average. Bass texture is very good, and bass resolution is above average. There is a mild amount of mid-bass bleed, but in my opinion, this is a trade-off worth making for bass impact and lower midrange body.
Considering its price, the T2 DLC has a very natural-sounding midrange. Male vocals are vibrant and have excellent body, though harsh male vocals do sound slightly smoothed over. Vocals sit above midrange instrumentation but do not overshadow it. Midrange timbre is generally very good, but there is a smidge of compression to analog percussion. Overall midrange clarity is excellent, and the level of presence is generally appropriate. Distorted electric guitars do sound a hair overdriven.
The T2 DLC has a competent if unexciting treble response. There is a moderate amount of lower treble which prevents cymbals from disappearing completely into the mix, but there is an audible dip in the mid-treble which robs those cymbals of sparkle. With that said, the T2 DLC has very good upper treble extension. Overall resolution and detail retrieval are average at best, but imaging, instrument separation, and the size of the T2 DLC’s soundstage are very good for a single dynamic driver design at this price point.

AMPLIFICATION REQUIREMENTS AND SOURCE PAIRING:​

The TinHiFi T2 DLC is easily driven to a usable listening volume. I did not notice hiss with either of my devices.

SIMILARLY PRICED ALTERNATIVES:​

Listeners in search of a slightly more aggressive but still coherent presentation should look at the Truthear Zero, which features a more defined sub-bass shelf and slightly more upper midrange presence. However, the Zero is much more difficult to drive than the T2 DLC.

CLOSING WORDS:​

The TinHiFi T2 DLC is competent in all respects and is a great addition to TinHifi’s lineup. I could not ask for more from an IEM with a street price of around $50, and I am happy to recommend the T2 DLC to new IEM listeners.
The TinHiFi T2 DLC can be purchased below:
TINHIFI T2 DLC TINHIFI T2 EVO TINHIFI T2

 

[darmanastartes]

Dunu Talos Review​

INTRODUCTION AND DISCLAIMER:​

The Dunu Talos is an in-ear monitor (IEM) utilizing a planar-magnetic driver and two optional balanced armatures (BAs) per housing. The BAs can be activated with a toggle switch. The Talos normally retails for $199.99 but is on sale for $179.99 at the time of writing this review. Dunu sent me a unit in exchange for my impressions.

SOURCES:​

I have used the Dunu Talos with the following sources:

• Qudelix 5K
• Hidizs S9
• E1DA 9038D

PACKAGING AND ACCESSORIES:​

The Dunu Talos comes in a medium-sized rectangular black box. The Talos is pictured on the front of the box’s slipcover, and technical specifications for the Talos and Dunu’s corporate contact information are provided on the rear of the slipcover. The lid of the box features Dunu’s logo. Inside the box are the included semi-rigid zippered carry case, a small rectangular cardboard box that stores the included 2-pin cable, and a foam mounting sheet that holds the IEMs. Confusingly, the Talos includes an instruction booklet for one of Dunu’s modular cables, but the included 2-pin cable is not modular. This is disappointing considering the Dunu Falcon Pro included a modular cable. The only other piece of included documentation is a quality control pass chit.
The Talos includes nine pairs of silicone eartips in three different styles. The first is a set of light grey conventional eartips (S, M, L), the second is a shorter, squatter set of black wide-bore eartips (S, M, L), and the third is a set of cylindrical tips which resemble a factory version of flip-tips (S, M, L). The Talos also includes a Dunu-branded velcro zip tie, a cleaning brush, and a Dunu-branded 3.5mm to 1/4" adapter.

BUILD QUALITY AND DESIGN:​

The Dunu Talos has water droplet-shaped faceplates. The center of the faceplate features a raised circular plateau marked with a stylized golden “D.” This raised section is surrounded by concentric grooves. The lip of the faceplate is rimmed with gold trim. The toggle switches that activate the BAs are located on the forward-facing side of the IEM. The off position is labeled “1,” and the on position is labeled “ON.” The 2-pin housings are flush with the rest of the shell. There are small “L” and “R” indicators near the base of the 2-pin housings. Each IEM has a pinprick circular vent near the base of the nozzle and three tiny ovular vents along the bottom of the housing. The nozzles are metal with metal mesh covers. The nozzles have substantial lips to secure eartips.

The included 2-pin cable uses a quad-braid below the Y-split and double-helix braids above the Y-split. The cable uses silver-plated wires with transparent rubber sheathing. The 3.5mm jack and Y-split hardware have a reflective, glossy finish. The jack uses a straight form factor. The Y-split is marked with the unit serial number. The cable features pre-formed earguides and a chin-adjustment choker. The cable is moderately microphonic.

COMFORT, FIT, AND ISOLATION:​

The Dunu Talos is intended to be worn cable-up. The earpieces have a shallow insertion depth with most eartips. Secureness of fit and isolation are poor. I was forced to use the largest size of the included wide-bore eartips to get a reasonably secure fit. There is no driver flex.

MEASUREMENTS:​

My measurements of the Dunu Talos can be found on my expanding squig.link database:
Dunu Talos — Squiglink by Bedrock Reviews

SOUND:​

With the BAs off, the Dunu Talos has a neutral tuning with a moderate sub-bass boost.
The Dunu Talos has above-average sub-bass extension. The bass does lack physicality, even on intense electronic dance tracks. However, the speed of bass articulation is excellent, as are bass texture and resolution. There is no mid-bass bleed.
The Talos has a vocal-forward midrange with textbook pinna gain centering at 2.5 kHz. Male vocals have grit and some body, while female vocals are rich and vibrant without being oversaturated. While the Talos has excellent midrange clarity and detail retrieval in most respects, I did feel that male vocals were not rendered with the same resolution as other types of midrange instrumentation. The internal resolution of female vocals is slightly better. There is a hint of planar plasticity to the midrange timbre but it did not impede my listening enjoyment. There is an appropriate level of presence.
What sets the Talos apart from similarly-priced IEMs is its treble response. In its stock configuration, the Talos has a detailed yet even treble response that avoids any harsh peaks. Even with the BAs off, the Talos has exceptional treble extension. There is ample sparkle and air but not too much of either. Overall resolution and detail retrieval are terrific, and the Talos has class-leading instrument separation. Imaging and soundstage width and depth are above average but not amazing.
The optional BAs are a tool best reserved for slower and darker-sounding recordings. For music with a heavy emphasis on top-end percussion, particularly fast-paced analog drums, I found that the lower treble emphasis created by the BAs was too strong. However, for slower ambient tracks, I felt that the BAs offered me greater insight into the soundscapes and textures.

AMPLIFICATION REQUIREMENTS AND SOURCE PAIRING:​

The Dunu Talos requires at least a modest dedicated source device with power delivery capabilities beyond what the Apple dongle can provide without circumventing the hardware volume limitation on Android. I did not notice hiss with any of my devices.

CLOSING WORDS:​

The Dunu Talos puts many of the IEMs under $300 I have heard to shame in terms of both tuning and technicalities. I do think the optional BAs are limited to niche applications, and I would love to see a streamlined, planar-magnetic-only version of the Talos for a modestly reduced price. Even so, the Talos is easily worth its retail price and is a no-brainer purchase on sale.
The Dunu Talos can be purchased below:
TALOS | DUNU (dunu-topsound.com)

 

[o0genesis0o]

Dunu Talos Review​

INTRODUCTION AND DISCLAIMER:​

The Dunu Talos is an in-ear monitor (IEM) utilizing a planar-magnetic driver and two optional balanced armatures (BAs) per housing. The BAs can be activated with a toggle switch. The Talos normally retails for $199.99 but is on sale for $179.99 at the time of writing this review. Dunu sent me a unit in exchange for my impressions.

SOURCES:​

I have used the Dunu Talos with the following sources:

• Qudelix 5K
• Hidizs S9
• E1DA 9038D

PACKAGING AND ACCESSORIES:​

The Dunu Talos comes in a medium-sized rectangular black box. The Talos is pictured on the front of the box’s slipcover, and technical specifications for the Talos and Dunu’s corporate contact information are provided on the rear of the slipcover. The lid of the box features Dunu’s logo. Inside the box are the included semi-rigid zippered carry case, a small rectangular cardboard box that stores the included 2-pin cable, and a foam mounting sheet that holds the IEMs. Confusingly, the Talos includes an instruction booklet for one of Dunu’s modular cables, but the included 2-pin cable is not modular. This is disappointing considering the Dunu Falcon Pro included a modular cable. The only other piece of included documentation is a quality control pass chit.
The Talos includes nine pairs of silicone eartips in three different styles. The first is a set of light grey conventional eartips (S, M, L), the second is a shorter, squatter set of black wide-bore eartips (S, M, L), and the third is a set of cylindrical tips which resemble a factory version of flip-tips (S, M, L). The Talos also includes a Dunu-branded velcro zip tie, a cleaning brush, and a Dunu-branded 3.5mm to 1/4" adapter.

BUILD QUALITY AND DESIGN:​

The Dunu Talos has water droplet-shaped faceplates. The center of the faceplate features a raised circular plateau marked with a stylized golden “D.” This raised section is surrounded by concentric grooves. The lip of the faceplate is rimmed with gold trim. The toggle switches that activate the BAs are located on the forward-facing side of the IEM. The off position is labeled “1,” and the on position is labeled “ON.” The 2-pin housings are flush with the rest of the shell. There are small “L” and “R” indicators near the base of the 2-pin housings. Each IEM has a pinprick circular vent near the base of the nozzle and three tiny ovular vents along the bottom of the housing. The nozzles are metal with metal mesh covers. The nozzles have substantial lips to secure eartips.

The included 2-pin cable uses a quad-braid below the Y-split and double-helix braids above the Y-split. The cable uses silver-plated wires with transparent rubber sheathing. The 3.5mm jack and Y-split hardware have a reflective, glossy finish. The jack uses a straight form factor. The Y-split is marked with the unit serial number. The cable features pre-formed earguides and a chin-adjustment choker. The cable is moderately microphonic.

COMFORT, FIT, AND ISOLATION:​

The Dunu Talos is intended to be worn cable-up. The earpieces have a shallow insertion depth with most eartips. Secureness of fit and isolation are poor. I was forced to use the largest size of the included wide-bore eartips to get a reasonably secure fit. There is no driver flex.

MEASUREMENTS:​

My measurements of the Dunu Talos can be found on my expanding squig.link database:
Dunu Talos — Squiglink by Bedrock Reviews

SOUND:​

With the BAs off, the Dunu Talos has a neutral tuning with a moderate sub-bass boost.
The Dunu Talos has above-average sub-bass extension. The bass does lack physicality, even on intense electronic dance tracks. However, the speed of bass articulation is excellent, as are bass texture and resolution. There is no mid-bass bleed.
The Talos has a vocal-forward midrange with textbook pinna gain centering at 2.5 kHz. Male vocals have grit and some body, while female vocals are rich and vibrant without being oversaturated. While the Talos has excellent midrange clarity and detail retrieval in most respects, I did feel that male vocals were not rendered with the same resolution as other types of midrange instrumentation. The internal resolution of female vocals is slightly better. There is a hint of planar plasticity to the midrange timbre but it did not impede my listening enjoyment. There is an appropriate level of presence.
What sets the Talos apart from similarly-priced IEMs is its treble response. In its stock configuration, the Talos has a detailed yet even treble response that avoids any harsh peaks. Even with the BAs off, the Talos has exceptional treble extension. There is ample sparkle and air but not too much of either. Overall resolution and detail retrieval are terrific, and the Talos has class-leading instrument separation. Imaging and soundstage width and depth are above average but not amazing.
The optional BAs are a tool best reserved for slower and darker-sounding recordings. For music with a heavy emphasis on top-end percussion, particularly fast-paced analog drums, I found that the lower treble emphasis created by the BAs was too strong. However, for slower ambient tracks, I felt that the BAs offered me greater insight into the soundscapes and textures.

AMPLIFICATION REQUIREMENTS AND SOURCE PAIRING:​

The Dunu Talos requires at least a modest dedicated source device with power delivery capabilities beyond what the Apple dongle can provide without circumventing the hardware volume limitation on Android. I did not notice hiss with any of my devices.

CLOSING WORDS:​

The Dunu Talos puts many of the IEMs under $300 I have heard to shame in terms of both tuning and technicalities. I do think the optional BAs are limited to niche applications, and I would love to see a streamlined, planar-magnetic-only version of the Talos for a modestly reduced price. Even so, the Talos is easily worth its retail price and is a no-brainer purchase on sale.
The Dunu Talos can be purchased below:
TALOS | DUNU (dunu-topsound.com)

I like how you mention the context to use BA drivers, rather than simply "good" or "not good". It seems that there is benefit in turning it on and off. I wonder how durable the switches are.

 

[darmanastartes]

Capital Audiofest 2022 Impressions​

Unlike my visit to Capital Audiofest last year, I did not spend much time listening to speakers this time around. From a cursory review of the exhibitor list, I did not see many engineering-focused speaker brands. Most speakers I heard at the show last year were overly bright, a fact I will let speak for itself.

Further, the limited variety of music available to demo speakers with at the show last year was a major hindrance. It is difficult for me to tell whether I like a pair of speakers without being able to use them to listen to music I listen to on my own time. While many of the typical demo tracks at audio shows have more dynamic range than my typical musical repertoire, it is impossible to evaluate a pair of speakers using only music where very little is actually happening. Last year, Spatial Audio Lab was one of the few speaker brands which allowed me to play music with actual bass content.

The main standout for me in terms of speakers this year was Philharmonic Audio, who were demoing their new BMR Tower. I also spent a significant amount of time talking with the Geshelli Labs team, who were debuting their new speaker amp. They were tremendously friendly people, and the unique design language of their products is an important competitive advantage in a headphone source and amplifier landscape that is increasingly “good enough” across the board. Otherwise, I focused on touring the headphone lounges scattered throughout the convention.

The impressions below are based on notes I took contemporaneously to my listening experience. They should be taken with a grain of salt given the noisy background listening environment.

Focal Utopia 2022

I was disappointed in the 2022 version of the Utopia. From admittedly distant memory, it did not sound nearly as good as the earlier version. The Utopia 2022 was very vocal forward, to the point of being shouty. It was also slightly muddy-sounding, with limp bass and a closed-in soundstage. Detail retrieval was underwhelming, and the timbre was distinctly metallic.

HiFiMan Susvara

The Susvara sounded much more detailed than the Utopia 2022, with much better instrument separation, bass presence, articulation, and extension. Vocals still sounded quite forward, to the point of being slightly sibilant.

Neumann NDH 20
This was my first time hearing the NDH 20, and I was very impressed. They were very detailed for being closed-back headphones, with a natural-sounding tonality. The NDH 20 seemed to do a better job of integrating vocals and instruments than the first two pairs of headphones I listened to. The NDH 20 also had excellent bass performance. Soundstage size was moderate.

RAAL-requisite CA-1a

This headphone was the highlight of the show for me. It had a unique, speaker-like physicality and excellent tonality. It also had superb upper treble extension and tremendous detail retrieval. I would rank this right up with the STAX SR-X9000 in terms of being one of the best headphones I have ever heard.

The Focal Utopia 2022, HiFiMan Susvara, and Neumann NDH 20 were powered by a Headamp GS-X mk2, while the RAAL-requisite CA-1a was powered by either a RAAL-requisite HSA-1b or a PDA-1a. I do not know what digital-to-analog converter was used at either listening station.

 

[darmanastartes]

Truthear Hexa Review​

INTRODUCTION AND DISCLAIMER:​

The Truthear Hexa is an in-ear monitor (IEM) utilizing one dynamic driver and three balanced armatures (BAs) per housing. The Hexa retails for $79.99 at ShenzhenAudio. ShenzhenAudio sent me a unit in exchange for my impressions.

SOURCES:​

I have used the Truthear Hexa with the following sources:

• Qudelix 5K
• Hidizs S9
• Xumee Dongle
• Apple Dongle

PACKAGING AND ACCESSORIES:​

The Truthear Hexa comes in a small rectangular black box with a white slipcover. Shiroi, one of Truthear’s anime mascots, is pictured on the front of the slipcover. Technical specifications for the Hexa, including a frequency response graph, and Truthear’s corporate contact information are provided on the rear of the slipcover in English and Chinese.

The IEMs are held inside the box in a foam mounting sheet. A Truthear-branded plastic mounting tray holds the included eartips. The Hexa includes seven pairs of eartips. There is one pair of black foam eartips, three pairs of white round silicone eartips (S, M, L), and three pairs of white conical wide-bore eartips (S, M, L). The Hexa includes the same Truthear-branded black synthetic leather carry pouch as the Truthear Zero. A user manual and warranty card are also included.

BUILD QUALITY AND DESIGN:​

The Truthear Hexa has black triangular aluminum alloy faceplates secured by a single screw. The black finish on one of these screws has already started to wear off on my unit. “Truthear” is printed in white along the bottom of the right faceplate. The housing bodies are 3D-printed from a translucent black acrylic material. The 2-pin connections are slightly recessed. “L” and “R” indicators are recessed into the housing in line with the 2-pin connections. The nozzles have two separate sound bores with green and yellow acoustic filter plugs. The nozzles do not have a raised lip.

The cable is the same as the one included with the Truthear Zero:

The cable uses black sheathed wires wrapped in a quad-braid below the Y-split and coiled into double-helix patterns above the Y-split. The cable has pre-formed heat-shrink earguides and a metal chin adjustment choker. The cable is very microphonic if the chin adjustment choker is not used. The L-shaped 3.5mm jack uses rubber hardware. There is strain relief above the 3.5mm jack but none at the Y-split.

COMFORT, FIT, AND ISOLATION:​

The Truthear Hexa is intended to be worn cable-up. The earpieces have a moderate insertion depth. The Hexa is one of the most comfortable IEMs I have ever used. Secureness of fit is excellent, but isolation is below average. There is no driver flex.

MEASUREMENTS:​

My measurements of the Truthear Hexa can be found on my expanding squig.link database:

Truthear Hexa — Squiglink by Bedrock Reviews

SOUND:​

The Truthear Hexa has a neutral tuning with a moderate sub-bass boost.

The Hexa has excellent sub-bass extension. The bass has impressive physicality and impact without creating bloom or muddiness. The bass is also highly textured and resolving. However, the Hexa has slower-than-average bass articulation compared to other IEMs priced between $75 and $100.

The Hexa has an appropriate level of pinna gain centered at 3 kHz. Both male vocals and female vocals are accurately rendered in terms of body, grit, and presence. Midrange clarity is excellent, and vocal intelligibily is terrific. BA timbre is noticeably absent.

The Hexa has a smooth yet detailed treble response with very good upper treble extension with silicone eartips. There are good amounts of both sparkle and air. Overall resolution is terrific for the price point. The Hexa has excellent instrument separation and a larger-than-average soundstage.

AMPLIFICATION REQUIREMENTS AND SOURCE PAIRING:​

While it is possible to power the Truthear Hexa with the Apple dongle, doing so required the volume level on Android devices to be nearly maxed out. Depending on your typical listening volume, I would recommend using a different source without the Apple dongle’s limitations if you regularly use an Android device. I did not notice hiss with any of my devices.

CLOSING WORDS:​

The Truthear Hexa is my new default recommendation at the sub-$100 price point. It is a nearly perfect purchase at its price, with my sole complaint being the relatively slow bass articulation.

The Truthear Hexa can be purchased below:

Truthear HEXA 1DD+3BA Hybird Earphones with 0.78 2Pin Cable Earbuds (shenzhenaudio.com)

 

[darmanastartes]

Kiwi Ears Cadenza Review​

The Kiwi Ears Cadenza is an in-ear monitor (IEM) that uses one dynamic driver per housing. The Cadenza retails for $35 at Linsoul’s Amazon shop. Linsoul sent me a unit in exchange for my impressions.

SOURCES:​

I have used the Kiwi Ears Cadenza with the following sources:

• Qudelix 5K
• Hidizs S9
• Apple Dongle

PACKAGING AND ACCESSORIES:​

The Kiwi Ears Cadenza comes in a small rectangular black box with a dark blue slipcover. Technical specifications for the Cadenza are provided on the side of the slipcover in English. The IEMs are held inside the box in a foam mounting sheet. The detachable cable, included eartips, and user manual are stored underneath this mounting sheet. The Cadenza includes nine pairs of eartips in three color schemes (3xS, 3xM, 3xL). The eartips are seemingly identical apart from the color. The Cadenza does not include a carry pouch or case.

BUILD QUALITY AND DESIGN:​

The Kiwi Ears Cadenza has black resin housings. The faceplates feature a swirling pearlescent pattern underneath a lacquer topcoat. There are circular vents adjacent to the 2–pin connector and at the base of the nozzle. The nozzles have perforated metal covers and substantial lips to secure eartips. The finish at the base of both nozzles has started wearing off on my unit. The 2-pin connectors are flush with the housings. It was extremely difficult to insert the 2-pin connector on one side. There are no directional indicators on the housings.

The cable is wrapped in a spiral pattern below the Y-split and uses twin double-helix patterns above it. The cable hardware is a mix of dark rubber and polished grey metal alloy. The 3.5mm jack uses an L-shaped form factor. There is substantial strain relief above the jack but none at the Y-split. There is a rubber chin adjustment choker. The cable uses pre-formed earguides. Large “L” and “R” indicators are printed on the 2-pin connector housings in white.

COMFORT, FIT, AND ISOLATION:​

The Kiwi Ears Cadenza is intended to be worn cable-up. The earpieces have a moderate insertion depth. The Cadenza is very comfortable, but isolation and secureness of fit are fairly poor. The earpieces require frequent readjustment to maintain a good seal. There is also substantial driver flex if the IEMs are inserted too deeply.

MEASUREMENTS:​

My measurements of the Kiwi Ears Cadenza can be found on my expanding squig.link database:

Kiwi Ears Cadenza — Squiglink by Bedrock Reviews

SOUND:​

The Kiwi Ears Cadenza has a U-shaped tuning that is reminiscent of the Moondrop S8, just with more bass.

The Cadenza has fair sub-bass extension, though it would benefit from increased sub-bass quantity. There is a moderate amount of impact to percussion hits. The bass is very textured and more resolving than I would expect at this price point. Bass dynamics are excellent, but bass articulation is a little sluggish. When listening to hard rock, such as the song “First Punch” by Nothing More, I found that bass guitars were more prominent in the mix than with many other IEMs. I do hear a hint of mid-bass bleed.

The Cadenza has a vocal-centric midrange with a prominent pinna gain region centered at 3 kHz. Midrange instrumentation generally takes a back seat to male vocals when both are present. The main exception is percussion, which the Cadenza does an exceptional job of rendering. On the song “Unshakeable” by Celldweller, I can clearly hear the first half of a drum fill at 1:24 which is typically obscured by synthesizers. Male vocals are clear, full-bodied, and gritty. Female vocals are noticeably more prominent than male vocals and are vibrant without being sibilant. Vocal intelligibility is excellent for both. The Cadenza has terrific timbre.

The Cadenza has a middle-of-the-road treble response that splits the difference between smooth and energetic. The Cadenza has moderate upper treble extension, with less sparkle or air than I would like. Detail retrieval is better than the $35 price point would suggest and is closer to what I would expect from a $50 IEM. Instrument separation is average at best, and the soundstage is on the small side.

AMPLIFICATION REQUIREMENTS AND SOURCE PAIRING:​

While it is possible to power the Kiwi Ears Cadenza with the Apple dongle, I had to use a volume setting of 22/25 on Android to reach my typical listening volume with Spotify Volume Normalization set to “Normal.” I recommend using a different source without the Apple dongle’s hardware volume limitations if you regularly use an Android device. I did not notice hiss with any of my devices.

CLOSING WORDS:​

The Kiwi Ears Cadenza is an excellent if not earth-shattering IEM. If you already own a well-reviewed IEM released in the last year at $50 or less, there is no need to pick this up. However, I would personally pick the Cadenza over the CCA CRA+ for a sub-$40 starter IEM because of how similar the Cadenza’s midrange tuning is to the Moondrop S8.

The Kiwi Ears Cadenza is available for purchase below:
Amazon.com: Linsoul Kiwi Ears Cadenza 10mm Beryllium Dynamic Driver IEM 3D Printed with Detachable Interchangeable Plug 0.78 2pin 3.5mm IEM Cable for Musician Audiophile (Verse, Cadenza) : Electronics

 

[darmanastartes]

Dunu Kima Review​

INTRODUCTION AND DISCLAIMERS:​

The Dunu Kima is an in-ear monitor (IEM) that uses one 10mm dynamic driver per housing. The Kima retails for $109.99 directly from Dunu. Dunu sent me a unit in exchange for my impressions.

SOURCES:​

I have used the Dunu Kima with the following sources:

• Qudelix 5K
• Hidizs S9
• Truthear Shio

PACKAGING AND ACCESSORIES:​

The Dunu Kima comes in a rectangular black box with a light grey slipcover. The Kima’s slipcover features an anime waifu wearing a maid outfit. Technical specifications for the Kima are provided on the back of the slipcover in Chinese, English, and Japanese. The Kima includes a zippered semi-rigid carry case and nine pairs of eartips in three different varieties. There are three pairs of Dunu Stage & Studio (S&S) eartips (S, M, L), three pairs of Dunu Candy eartips (S, M, L), and three pairs of generic silicone eartips (S, M, L). The Kima, like the Dunu Talos, includes an instruction manual for Dunu’s modular cable termination system even though the included 2-pin cable does not use this system. Finally, the Kima includes a cleaning brush, a microfiber cloth, and a 3.5mm to 1/4" jack adapter.

BUILD QUALITY AND DESIGN:​

The Dunu Kima has zinc alloy housings with a non-reflective, nearly matte finish. The faceplates have four sub-faces. On the left earpiece, the bottom edge of the sub-face closest to the 2-pin connectors is printed with the text “CRIZ FACTION.” “Kima” is printed in this same spot on the right earpiece. There is a circular vent with a paper blocker offset from the 2-pin connector on the inner face of the housing body. “L” and “R” indicators are printed in dark grey on the opposite side of this vent from the 2-pin connector. There is a second, smaller circular vent at the base of the nozzle. “DUNU 10 mm DLC DYNAMIC” is printed in a radial pattern around this vent on both earpieces. The nozzles are brass with metal mesh covers. The nozzles have substantial lips with which to secure eartips. The 2-pin connectors are flush with the housings. The 2-pin connectors are very snug, perhaps too much so.

The hefty monocrystalline silver-plated copper cable uses a quad-braid pattern below the Y-split and double-helix patterns above it. The cable hardware is mostly polished alloy. The Y-split hardware is branded with the Dunu logo. The 3.5mm jack hardware has a straight form factor. My biggest issue with the cable is the red rubber accent at the base of the 3.5mm jack, which detracts from the otherwise elegant aesthetic. There is substantial strain relief above the jack but none at the Y-split. There is a metal chin adjustment choker. The cable uses pre-formed earguides, and the 2-pin connectors are embossed with “L” and “R” indicators. The cable is quite microphonic even with the use of the chin adjustment choker.

COMFORT, FIT, AND ISOLATION:​

The Dunu Kima is intended to be worn cable-up. The earpieces have a shallow insertion depth. The Kima is very comfortable, but isolation and secureness of fit are below average. The earpieces require frequent readjustment to maintain a good seal. I recommend either using the included Dunu S&S tips or the largest possible size of your preferred third-party eartip with the Kima. I did experience some driver flex with a medium-size Dunu S&S eartip on the right side. For reference, my right ear canal is smaller than my left.

MEASUREMENTS:​

My measurements of the Dunu Kima can be found on my expanding squig.link database:
Dunu Kima — Squiglink by Bedrock Reviews

SOUND:​

The Dunu Kima has a Harman-ish tuning. The Kima has a more pronounced sub-bass emphasis and a more distinct pinna gain peak than many of its peers that opt for more relaxed transitions in these frequency ranges.
The Kima has good sub-bass extension. There is a 7.5 dB bass boost relative to the lower midrange. This imparts enough impact and slam to percussion hits to satisfyingly render energetic electronic music. Bass articulation is good, but bass resolution leaves a little to be desired. Bass texture is average, while bass dynamics are better than average. I do not hear mid-bass bleed.
The Kima has a distinct pinna gain region centered at around 2.5 kHz. There is not as much vertical separation between male vocals and dense instrumentation as I would like. With that said, the Kima does a good job of balancing between the two and not burying distorted electric guitar riffs beneath harsh male vocals. Analog percussion fares less well in terms of overall emphasis but avoids timbral compression, which is a win for the Kima. There is a tinge of boominess to male vocals which impairs male vocal intelligibility, even if only slightly. Female vocals sound deeper and more subdued than I am used to. While this avoids any potential sibilance, I felt myself wishing for a bit more energy and zing to female vocals.
The Kima attempts to placate the treble-sensitive without compromising detail retrieval. This effort bears mixed results. The Kima has a smooth, relaxed lower treble response. The Kima tries to offset this with a heavy dose of upper treble. The Kima’s upper treble extension is excellent for a single dynamic driver design at this price point. However, the uneven application of treble creates a discongruity between the leading edge of notes, which are not emphasized enough, and the trailing edge of notes, which are too emphasized. In the end, detail retrieval is merely average, as are instrument separation and soundstage.

AMPLIFICATION REQUIREMENTS AND SOURCE PAIRING:​

Reaching my typical listening volume with the Apple dongle required the system volume on my Android device to be maxed out. Note that I use Spotify Volume Normalization on the “Normal” setting. Even then, it was clear to my ears that the Apple dongle could not drive the Dunu Kima competently. The Kima’s bass performance in particular took a noticeable step back. I strongly recommend using a source other than the Apple dongle with the Kima. I did not notice hiss with any of my devices.

CLOSING WORDS:​

The Dunu Kima is fun to listen to but does not stand out compared to its similarly-priced competitors in terms of technical proficiency. I would pass on this one.
The Dunu Kima is available for purchase below:
KIMA | DUNU (dunu-topsound.com)