Exacoustatowner
1000+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Feb 8, 2015
- Posts
- 1,227
- Likes
- 122
You don't actually believe that do you?
se
No. I should have added an ironic smiley. I work in science and have some grasp of physics. Purely sarcastic.
![Headphone Smile :) :)](https://cdn.head-fi.org/e/headfi/smily_headphones1.gif)
You don't actually believe that do you?
se
No. I should have added an ironic smiley. I work in science and have some grasp of physics. Purely sarcastic.I still believe in FR!
Oh, whew! Had me worried there for a moment. After the moon landing hoax was exposed, you have to be a real idiot to fall for this stuff anymore.
se
I'll watch on the computer- thanks Steve.
Btw: part of the reason my audio is not shrill, thin, and with voices misplaced is that MY interconnects have No Resistance! Rather they have Acceptance!
Last year's news. Susceptance is where it's at, baby!
se
No recording represents reality but LPs are close, no CDs though.
Yet LP adds so much that is not there on the original recording such as noise and distortion, speed instability, mistracking, mono bass at low frequencies..How does that fit in with a rational model of high fidelity or reality as you suggest, well given that LP cannot produce a perceptibly clean signal and cannot even give you back what was put in without adding layers of grunty, it does not. A CD player can give you an analog output that is an exact replica of the continuous signal encoded on the media it was fed, you can verify this with an analog scope if you like, No LP spinner can do this, again this can be verified with an analog scope such as in the demo by Alan Shaw, therefore LP cannot get close to reality QED. It does not matter how much money you throw at this the laws of physics are wholly indifferent.
Also the CD player adds so little noise/distortion as to be wholly imperceptible at normal listening levels
If you are interested in learning here is an interesting HA thread about the limits of Vinyl
In the above thread you will find images of extracts from the lead-out of Sgt Peppers which is a 15k tone, the tone extracted from the CD is notably cleaner while the extract from the LP has a whole bunch of spuriae and is substantially less well defined
Brightness: Too much high frequency or treble, also known as "digititis"
Thin: is having little depth, being lean or not having a lot of body. Lacking resonance or fullness; tinny: Instruments sound small, not real. The piano had a thin sound.
So you're saying that digital playback that measures flat somehow knows when a measurement is being performed so it can put out a perfect frequency response, but as soon as it isn't being measured, it magically has too much high frequency?
Yet LP adds so much that is not there on the original recording such as noise and distortion, speed instability, mistracking, mono bass at low frequencies..How does that fit in with a rational model of high fidelity or reality as you suggest, well given that LP cannot produce a perceptibly clean signal and cannot even give you back what was put in without adding layers of grunty, it does not. A CD player can give you an analog output that is an exact replica of the continuous signal encoded on the media it was fed, you can verify this with an analog scope if you like, No LP spinner can do this, again this can be verified with an analog scope such as in the demo by Alan Shaw, therefore LP cannot get close to reality QED. It does not matter how much money you throw at this the laws of physics are wholly indifferent.
Also the CD player adds so little noise/distortion as to be wholly imperceptible at normal listening levels
The CD or any other digital crap, is an electrical device that attempts to recreate an analog signal or attempts to give us a representation or samples of what it thinks that it may be.
If you are interested in learning here is an interesting HA thread about the limits of Vinyl Limits
In case you're not up on > century old science, the electrical signal that comes out of your turntable's cartridge is already quantized in the form of discrete electrons.
You stylus and all the all your records are also make of discrete atoms with finite sizes so it's not really "analog" either.