Aleksandar R.
Sponsor: RAAL 1995
- No plans to change anything with SR's as they are.While the new HPs look fancy and more classic, I still prefer the look of the CA1a. However, since I do not own any (working) circumaural headphones, I might consider getting an Immanis if its sound obviously surpasses everything currently on Earth.
@Aleksandar R. I have two questions :
- Are you planning to release upgraded ribbons to update our existing SR1a at some point?
- I love using my SR1a floating without front padding (about a 1 cm gap at the front) and combining it with my (very big) subwoofer. I am wondering if by doing so, it improves resonances, HRTF, airiness... Also, how much bass is lost from the HPs? Only sub-bass, or am I creating a strong dip up to maybe 300Hz? It depends on the recording, but sometimes it feels even more lifelike/realistic by removing these two big foam pieces.
The new thing we're doing with ribbons prevents us to make them exchangeable. We still "slide in" the frames that hold the ribbons stretched, but reduced gaps between the frame and the ribbon edges are now tight enough that we can't allow for slightly arced frame that provides friction while sliding them in and holding them into place.
Now they are straight and so loose inside the magnets that they would rattle if we don't cement them in place.
The new tuning adjustments we're doing for the ribbons does not allow for the frame to be under any type of tension, or the tuning will change and change the differences we want in the tuning of adjacent ribbons inside one driver.
Basically, new developments wouldn't bring much advantage in a single ribbon driver. We could offer the new type of ribbon suspension that we do now, but it wouldn't make much of a difference to an SR type ribbon that has already settled it's resonant frequency,
-yes, you do create an advantage of adding the front leakage zone, as you're directly improving the HRTF. so you're having better fill of the center in stereo imaging.
That will be the scope of my work for the future "open baffle" headphones. Front leakage, not back leakage.
I don't thing that anything significant is happening with reducing unwanted resonances, at least I haven't seen that in my measurements and listening.
You loose gradually towards bass. This can't make the distinction and loose upper bass only, or low bass only.
It happens very smoothly, all the way from 2k down, so no strong dips from, say, 300Hz down, but you will notice that the slope became too tilted downwards as things below 200-300Hz start becoming too dry.
Only in conjunction with the subwoofer, you can create a dip in that region, when the padless SR slope starts sooner and then the woofer kicks in below.
Basically, you have entered a zone of sorting out the crossover region of a 2-way speaker...
Stay updated on RAAL 1995 at their sponsor profile on Head-Fi.
|