Scholarlymonk
Head-Fier
- Joined
- May 11, 2003
- Posts
- 50
- Likes
- 0
Is there better quality CD-Rs that will effect the quality?
What is the best CD-R to buy?
What is the best CD-R to buy?
Is there better quality CD-Rs that will effect the quality? |
Originally Posted by Stephonovich I know, it doesn't make sense. Bit == 1 || 0. Nothing in between. However, offsets DO make sense to me. My burner (I use for ripping, since it's in better shape than my main drive) has a +685 read offset. Since there's 44,100 samples to a second in Redbook, that's about 1/64 of a second. Not much, granted, but it's not a 1:1 copy anymore, since the lost data is filled up with null to make up for it. (-:Stephonovich |
Originally Posted by mikeliao So, in theory if I make perfect .wav copies of my music, I could use a cheap computer with an awesome soundcard as a near perfect transport. Right or am I missing a step here? |
Originally Posted by kaitsuburi I wouldn't imagine pirates in China are using Taiyo Yuden media burned at 4X I don't know about you, but I am always paranoid about CD copying.... |
Originally Posted by mikeliao So, in theory if I make perfect .wav copies of my music, I could use a cheap computer with an awesome soundcard as a near perfect transport. Right or am I missing a step here? |
Originally Posted by Mr.PD It seems to me that you guys are talking about copying music to a hard drive then placing it on a CD. What about just placing the original CD in one drive and a CD-R in the burner drive and copying it directly? Wouldn't that give you an exact copy, sounding as good as the original? |