I’m sorry for the delay on my impressions for the V14, but I’ve picked up a mild sinus infection which affects my hearing somewhat. Once I’m past it, I’ll post my listening impressions.
I did play with the switches today, and unlike the VX, the changes are more subtle. The bass boost from Crin’s graph looks to be about 2dB, so you’re not going to get the bass head level of the VX which is fine for me since I felt its bump was too much for my liking. As you can see below, those that found the VX too bright may have a remedy with the V14’s switches all on:
Also, for those somewhat new to graphs, please keep in mind the 8kHz bump is an insertion resonance, not necessarily an indicator of the V14’s true frequency response. As Crin mentions:
“Expect a resonant peak. This peak exists around 7-10k and is affected by insert depth. If you are not sure what I’m talking about … ignore [graph] frequencies above 7k.”
On the topic of polarity, I’m going to respond by saying something that some will find controversial … since qdc reverses absolute polarity, not relative polarity, this will not be an issue when using other cables that don’t have its polarity reversed, and let me explain why:
Maintaining absolute polarity is when the signal recorded at the studio matches the output when played by the consumer, i.e., when the microphone driver is pushed inward by the waveform, this creates a playback transducer to push outward thereby producing a compression waveform at one’s ears. The problem with this scenario is that few studios, if any, concern themselves with maintaining absolute polarity given the environment with cabling and equipment in a studio, as I understand it. This means every released CD or music file one has will potentially not be in absolute polarity, it’s about a 50/50% proposition. This is the reason why qdc’s polarity design is not going to create a problem when using other cables.
Perhaps @Deezel177 can chime in if I explained this phenomena correctly since he is a recording engineer.
Also, for those somewhat new to graphs, please keep in mind the 8kHz bump is an insertion resonance, not necessarily an indicator of the V14’s true frequency response. As Crin mentions:
“Expect a resonant peak. This peak exists around 7-10k and is affected by insert depth. If you are not sure what I’m talking about … ignore [graph] frequencies above 7k.”
On the topic of polarity, I’m going to respond by saying something that some will find controversial … since qdc reverses absolute polarity, not relative polarity, this will not be an issue when using other cables that don’t have its polarity reversed, and let me explain why:
Maintaining absolute polarity is when the signal recorded at the studio matches the output when played by the consumer, i.e., when the microphone driver is pushed inward by the waveform, this creates a playback transducer to push outward thereby producing a compression waveform at one’s ears. The problem with this scenario is that few studios, if any, concern themselves with maintaining absolute polarity given the environment with cabling and equipment in a studio, as I understand it. This means every released CD or music file one has will potentially not be in absolute polarity, it’s about a 50/50% proposition. This is the reason why qdc’s polarity design is not going to create a problem when using other cables.
Perhaps @Deezel177 can chime in if I explained this phenomena correctly since he is a recording engineer.
I'm not 100% sure whether polarity or phase in the recording studio translates directly to IEMs. But, I can speak from my own experience (as well as the testimonies of others) that inverting the polarity of an IEM relative to its cable can cause anomalies in imaging. It depends on the in-ear, but it can generally be described as a diffuseness of the centre image, as well as a cross-feed-like effect towards the left and right. I can't say for sure whether or not that's what you'll experience with the V14, but that has been the general consensus among listeners I've spoken to.
I'm not 100% sure whether polarity or phase in the recording studio translates directly to IEMs. But, I can speak from my own experience (as well as the testimonies of others) that inverting the polarity of an IEM relative to its cable can cause anomalies in imaging. It depends on the in-ear, but it can generally be described as a diffuseness of the centre image, as well as a cross-feed-like effect towards the left and right. I can't say for sure whether or not that's what you'll experience with the V14, but that has been the general consensus among listeners I've spoken to.
Thank you for your reply. Yes, I understand there is a sonic hit when the signal is not in absolute polarity, and it does impact imaging, but since we can never know if the released media maintains absolute polarity throughout the signal chain, it’s a moot point unless … as some of my customers did by listening through a system with an absolute polarity switch, one listens to each of their recordings and marks on them which polarity position sounds better. Complicating this is that a given album may have tracks both in and out of absolute polarity.
Thank you for your reply. Yes, I understand there is a sonic hit when the signal is not in absolute polarity, and it does impact imaging, but since we can never know if the released media maintains absolute polarity throughout the signal chain, it’s a moot point unless … as some of my customers did by listening through a system with an absolute polarity switch, one listens to each of their recordings and marks on them which polarity position sounds better. Complicating this is that a given album may have tracks both in and out of absolute polarity.
I think I disagree here. On any speaker I have tried this with, inverting the polarity hurt the sound. And listening to recorded vs live, the inverted polarity is definitely hurting the reproduction. Now, I refer to the is as out of phase. I do not feel it is a moot point. Tks.
I think I disagree here. On any speaker I have tried this with, inverting the polarity hurt the sound. And listening to recorded vs live, the inverted polarity is definitely hurting the reproduction. Now, I refer to the is as out of phase. I do not feel it is a moot point. Tks.
Based on my experience, I agree with jwbrent, really hard to detect if we reverse the phase in speaker (and IEM) for BOTH channel. The recording chain, and playback chain make it impossible to detect absolute correct phase.
If we reverse only one channel then it will be very obvious.
Yes. In re-reading the comments on polarity and phase I may have mis-understood the discussion. I am speaking about a system being out of phase caused by the polarity being inverted on only one speaker. I think you are talking about reversing the polarity of both speakers which would keep them both in phase. That is probably fine, though my OCD would never allow me to leave it that way once I caught it. Tks.
Just received these. Quick Q: where would I be able to read more about the switches? At this point in time, I am not even sure which way is on or off. Or even how to handle the switches? Is there a tool for the switches?
Apologies for the many noob questions. Thanks!
Just received these. Quick Q: where would I be able to read more about the switches? At this point in time, I am not even sure which way is on or off. Or even how to handle the switches? Is there a tool for the switches?
Apologies for the many noob questions. Thanks!
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.