px200 vs sr60
Feb 8, 2003 at 11:03 PM Thread Starter Post #1 of 6

djgustashaw

1000+ Head-Fier
Joined
Jan 2, 2003
Posts
1,013
Likes
10
ive recently been looking at picking up a pair of hd580's, but after a school bus ride yesterday with the *awesome* grado sr60's, it seems like it would make more sense at the moment to invest in a good portable pair of sealed phones. the grados are indeed good, but not at all practical for portability with the long cord, big drivers, zero sound isolation, and somewhat fragile feel. so i've been looking at the px200; how would these compare to the grados? they don't need to be on par with them of course, but what can i expect in comparison in terms of sound quality? also, how is the durability and true portable-ness of the cans? thanks in advance.
 
Feb 9, 2003 at 12:51 AM Post #3 of 6
I own both and each has a place in my collection. You could not ask for a comparison between two more different headphones!
The SR60s to me sound fun... they are good with the highs and mids but lack impact on the low end. Some will say the highs are harsh but to my ears they are accurate. They are easily driven but not highly protable. Great for rock and roll, but a too shallow for jazz and classical.
The PX200s are quite the opposite... they are dark, deep and have tons of impact. I find the highs are accurate as well, and the mids are excellent. There is a little bit of a veiled sound to the music when driven at a low volume but this varies between recordings. I am beginning to come around to the veiw that they have a bit of an exaggerated low end response, but I find this varies greatly from recording to recording. I find they handle most music very well but are best for instrumental music, jazz and classical, as well as female vocals. The build quality of the PX200s is excellent, despite their feather-light feel on my head, and greatly enhanced portability. The way they fold up is well thought out and the case that stores the cans is only slightly larger than a case for glasses. I would like Senn to outfit the next generation with a heavier cord and a more burly interconnect but the cables and interconnect are good. I remember one person saying he wished they had a 90 degree mini-plug but that was only one person, I think.
The isolation the PX200s offer I find to be very good, I've not tried them on an airplane or in the car but they cut down everyday noise to a level that allows me to enjoy my music on the go or in the lab. Also, I find that while the PX200s fit me well, I have difficulty wearing them outside in the wind because they are not circumaural, the wind slips between the pad and my ear and swirls around causing a horrible noise, others I've read don't experience this.
I like both, but I carry the PX200s in my bag and have the grados at the office but they both will never compare to my main rig.

Hope this helps.
Bobes
 
Feb 9, 2003 at 2:54 AM Post #4 of 6
Quote:

Originally posted by Bobes
The PX200s are quite the opposite... they are dark, deep and have tons of impact. I find the highs are accurate as well, and the mids are excellent. There is a little bit of a veiled sound to the music when driven at a low volume but this varies between recordings. I am beginning to come around to the veiw that they have a bit of an exaggerated low end response, but I find this varies greatly from recording to recording.


Bobes, did you find that there was a significant burn-in period for the PX200s? I just got a pair the other day and have used them for about 6 hours and I would describe them almost completely opposite. Except for the highs, which I agree are very accurate, I find the mids lacking and the bass, althoug punchy, is not very deep. I like them very much so far because they provide a lot of clarity, but I would like what I would call a bit warmer sound.
 
Feb 9, 2003 at 4:04 AM Post #5 of 6
The px200 sounded a bit harsh and cheap at first, give them time, they should return to normal.

As for comparing to the sr60s, the sr60s are probably more technically accurate, but I can't really tell since I've gotten so used to the dt990s, that the sr60s are great at inducing instant-headache.

Yes, they're very different.
 
Feb 9, 2003 at 4:33 PM Post #6 of 6
I have had the PX200s since the first shipping from HeadRoom in December, they are well broken in, although I didn't give them the usual break-in treatment. But yes, they do improve greatly with break-in... give it a couple days and listen again. I do find that the characteristics that I describe are highly dependent on the quality of the recording.
bobes
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top