penvzila
500+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Jun 30, 2002
- Posts
- 912
- Likes
- 11
Quote:
Finally someone who agrees with me. It's bad enough controlling halo with the xbox's horrible controller, why would you want to add realistic gun accuracy after that?
| Originally posted by SumB Splinter Cell is the darling of the ignorant press. Sam Fisher moves with the agility of someone with a broom handle up their butt, and the controls are quite unresponsive. A blind man would have better marksmanship than this clown. The plot is badly contrived and the cut-scenes are cheesy, poorly written and staged affairs that give little incentive to continue the pain of the trial-and-error structured gameplay. AI and level design is just horrific. I haven't seen such cramped, sparse, and blocky levels populated with this many sprites since generations past. You get a paltry 10 levels and zero replay value - no secrets to unlock or discover, no alternate endings, no randomness of enemy placement or objectives - just unadulterated diddly squat. To sum up, try Thief, Thief II, Hitman, Hitman 2, or even Deus Ex for geat stealth action, and if a cinematic story-driven experience with high production values and a good, but very short gameplay portion sounds acceptable, MGS2 is your game. Splinter Cell is no gem. |
Finally someone who agrees with me. It's bad enough controlling halo with the xbox's horrible controller, why would you want to add realistic gun accuracy after that?
